★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/013/029/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/013/029/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1820. Sept. 26<lb/> | |||
' | <!-- pencil --><head>J.B. to Mora Letter 3</head></p> | ||
<p>Now speak of a Jury – a Jury will not do for you. On your<lb/> | |||
existing system of procedure <del>of a</del> it can not be tacked by any<lb/> | |||
means, at least with any advantage. It would require a<lb/> | |||
system of procedure made on purpose to receive it. <del>in</del> In<lb/> | |||
Bonaparte's and <del><gap/></del> some intendant systems, there was<lb/> | |||
that sort of basis for it: and so they have Juries though<lb/> | |||
<gap/> ones. More on this subject in another letter.<lb/> | |||
<del>Not</del> As to publicity <add>of judicature</add>, you have example of it not only<lb/> | |||
in England, and the Ango-American States, but in France.</p> | |||
<p>This or that Member – this or that Counsellor – might<lb/> | |||
possibly be disposed to consult me in relation to this or that<lb/> | |||
point: To give <del><gap/></del> answers to any such <gap/> question<lb/> | |||
would be a useless and <del><gap/></del> endless business. Emperor<lb/> | |||
Alexander as he told me had ordered his Codifiers to put<lb/> | |||
<add>such</add> questions to me. I <del>begged</del> assured him any such order<lb/> | |||
would be of no <del><gap/></del> use. Compleatness, conciseness and consistency <del>it</del> and clearness, these if they had any good qualities<lb/> | |||
would be the qualities of any codes: under those heads they<lb/> | |||
might <unclear>arise</unclear> as <unclear>portions</unclear>: whatsoever changes might be thought<lb/> | |||
fit to be made int he substance.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1820. Sept. 26
J.B. to Mora Letter 3
Now speak of a Jury – a Jury will not do for you. On your
existing system of procedure of a it can not be tacked by any
means, at least with any advantage. It would require a
system of procedure made on purpose to receive it. in In
Bonaparte's and some intendant systems, there was
that sort of basis for it: and so they have Juries though
ones. More on this subject in another letter.
Not As to publicity of judicature, you have example of it not only
in England, and the Ango-American States, but in France.
This or that Member – this or that Counsellor – might
possibly be disposed to consult me in relation to this or that
point: To give answers to any such question
would be a useless and endless business. Emperor
Alexander as he told me had ordered his Codifiers to put
such questions to me. I begged assured him any such order
would be of no use. Compleatness, conciseness and consistency it and clearness, these if they had any good qualities
would be the qualities of any codes: under those heads they
might arise as portions: whatsoever changes might be thought
fit to be made int he substance.
Identifier: | JB/013/029/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 13. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1820-09-21 |
|||
013 |
rid yourselves of ultramaria |
||
029 |
jb to mora letter 3 |
||
001 |
|||
correspondence |
1 |
||
recto |
d8? / e5? |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[fleur de lys] i&m 1818]] |
||
arthur wellesley, duke of wellington |
|||
1818 |
|||
[[notes_public::"employ this" [note in bentham's hand]]] |
4478 |
||