JB/035/090/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/035/090/003: Difference between revisions

Kmason (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/035/090/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/035/090/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
If, for argument sake it be uncertain whether the case is that there is no legal definition of a libel, or whether the case is that there is a legal definition of a libel but such a one as is in<lb/>compatible with liberty in manner above mentioned<del>by</del> Jury <unclear>still more clearly</unclear>at liberty in point of conscience and it is <unclear>still</unclear>more clearly thus Duty as well as interest to act as if there were no <del>more</del> law <add>complementing the publication of a libel</add> making a libel an offence, and in consequence in the case of every such <gap/>a verdict of not guilty. <p>If <gap/> it be the opinion of a Jury<lb/>man, as it is mine, that there <gap/> nothing on this subject which is entitled to this <add>appellation</add> denomination of a law or rule of law, he may <add>not only</add> without any breach of his oath join in every <gap/>in giving a verdict of not guilty, <add>but</add> and he is bound by his oath to do so, or to <gap/> in finding an official verdict.</p><p>If it be his opinion that there<gap/> or rule of law, but that law or rule of law is incompatible with the opinion of politi<lb/>cal</p>
 
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
 
<p><!-- indent -->If for argument sake it be uncertain whether the
<lb/>
case is that there is no <del>d</del> legal definition of a  
<lb/>
libel, ,<!-- two commas have been placed here, spaced apart --> or whether the case is that there is a legal  
<lb/>
definition of a libel but such a<del>n</del> one as is incompatible
<lb/>
with liberty in manner above mentioned
<lb/>
<del>the</del> a Jury are still more clearly at liberty in
<lb/>
point of conscience and it is still more clearly
<lb/>
their duty as well as interest to act as if there  
<lb/>
were no <del>law</del> law <del><unclear>at</unclear></del> <add>constituting the publication of a libel</add> making a libel an offence,  
<lb/>
and in consequence in the case of every such  
<lb/>
prosecution to pronounce <add>give</add> a verdict of not guilty.
<lb/></p>
<p><!-- indent -->If <del>a Juryman</del> it be the opinion of a Juryman ,
<lb/>
as it is mine , that there exists nothing on
<lb/>
this subject which is entitled to the denomination <add>appellation</add>  
<lb/>
of a law or rule of law , he may <add>not only</add> without any  
<lb/>
breach of his oath join in every instance in
<lb/>
giving a verdict of not guilty , and <add>but</add> and he is bound  
<lb/>
by his oath <add>either</add> to do so, [or to <del>f</del> join in finding  
<lb/>
a special verdict.]<!-- opening and closing brackets in pencil -->
<lb/></p>
<p><!-- indent -->If it be his opinion that there exist<del>s</del>  <add>does exist</add> such
<lb/>
a <del>rule</del> law or rule of law , but that that law or  
<lb/>
rule of law is incompatible with the existence of politi<add>cal</add>
<lb/></p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:46, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


If for argument sake it be uncertain whether the
case is that there is no d legal definition of a
libel, , or whether the case is that there is a legal
definition of a libel but such an one as is incompatible
with liberty in manner above mentioned
the a Jury are still more clearly at liberty in
point of conscience and it is still more clearly
their duty as well as interest to act as if there
were no law law at constituting the publication of a libel making a libel an offence,
and in consequence in the case of every such
prosecution to pronounce give a verdict of not guilty.

If a Juryman it be the opinion of a Juryman ,
as it is mine , that there exists nothing on
this subject which is entitled to the denomination appellation
of a law or rule of law , he may not only without any
breach of his oath join in every instance in
giving a verdict of not guilty , and but and he is bound
by his oath either to do so, [or to f join in finding
a special verdict.]

If it be his opinion that there exists does exist such
a rule law or rule of law , but that that law or
rule of law is incompatible with the existence of political




Identifier: | JB/035/090/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

090

Info in main headings field

Image

003

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::floyd & co [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur young

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10683

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in