JB/081/200/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/081/200/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/081/200/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/081/200/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><head>1829.  April<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
Petitions.<lb/></head>
 
<note>Supplement.</note></p>
 
<p>Now for the corresponding portions of the<lb/>
here proposed system.</p>
<p>Before the eyes of the reader has been<lb/>
that part of the here proposed system, which, in the<lb/>
Prayer of the Petition, is placed under the head of Procedure.<lb/>
Numbered paragraphs occupied by it, 18:  viz<lb/>
from 28. to 47. both inclusive:  pages from 185. to 194.  Of<lb/>
the arrangements brought to view and proposed in the<lb/>
aggregate of <hi rend="underline">those</hi> <del>same</del> paragraphs, not one will be found<lb/>
in the Justice of Peace Summary procedure, taken in<lb/>
the aggregate.</p>
<p>In respect to each one of <del>them</del> <add>the there</add> proposed<lb/>
arrangements, questions, which it is desired of each<lb/>
reader that he would put – in the first place to himself, <lb/>
in the next place to any person whom he holds converse<lb/>
with on the subject, these.  It is <hi rend="underline">useless?</hi> is it needless?<lb/>
As to <hi rend="underline">usefulness,</hi> does it not afford some promise of<lb/>
proving contributory to the end declared to be in view?<lb/>
As to <hi rend="underline">needlessness,</hi> is <del>this</del> <add>the matter in question</add> on anything resembling it,<lb/>
as yet visible in any other publication which has<lb/>
anywhere made its appearance?</p>
<p>So much for <hi rend="underline">Procedure</hi>.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:06, 9 August 2021

Click Here To Edit

1829. April
Petitions.
Supplement.

Now for the corresponding portions of the
here proposed system.

Before the eyes of the reader has been
that part of the here proposed system, which, in the
Prayer of the Petition, is placed under the head of Procedure.
Numbered paragraphs occupied by it, 18: viz
from 28. to 47. both inclusive: pages from 185. to 194. Of
the arrangements brought to view and proposed in the
aggregate of those same paragraphs, not one will be found
in the Justice of Peace Summary procedure, taken in
the aggregate.

In respect to each one of them the there proposed
arrangements, questions, which it is desired of each
reader that he would put – in the first place to himself,
in the next place to any person whom he holds converse
with on the subject, these. It is useless? is it needless?
As to usefulness, does it not afford some promise of
proving contributory to the end declared to be in view?
As to needlessness, is this the matter in question on anything resembling it,
as yet visible in any other publication which has
anywhere made its appearance?

So much for Procedure.



Identifier: | JB/081/200/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

200

Info in main headings field

petitions

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / d34

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

street & co

Marginals

Paper Producer

antonio alcala galiano

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25987

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in