JB/087/103/003: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 10:09, 4 February 2020

they should have any votes at all. All that is necessary
is that they should have communication of
every thing that is done, and make enter a declaration
each of them with regard to every act of his whether
they approve or disapprove of it. Such declaration
they might not only be at liberty to to make
but obliged to make without having a vote: the communication
might in ordinary cases be made to them
before the act issuing the order, but in cases requiring
particular dispatch not till afterwards. Might
not such an arrangement be in certain cases a means of obviating
and certain some the dangers of dissention
and delay?

Identifier: \| JB/087/103/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	not numbered
Box	087	Main Headings	indirect legislation
Folio number	103	Info in main headings field	indirect
Image	003	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f5 / f6 / f7 / f8
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	27628
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/087/103/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-they should have any votes at all.  All that is necessary<lb/> is that they should have communication of<lb/>every thing that is done, and make <add>enter in</add> declaration<lb/>each of them with regard to every act of his whether<lb/>they approve or disapprove of it.  Such declaration<lb/>they might not only be at liberty to <del><gap/></del> to make<lb/>but obliged to make without having a vote: the communication<lb/>might in ordinary cases be made to them<lb/>before the <del><gap/></del> the order, but in cases requiring<lb/>particular dispatch not <gap/> afterwards.  Might<lb/>not such an arrangement be <add>in certain cases</add> a means of obviating<lb/> and<del>certain</del> some <gap/> the dangers of dissolution<lb/>and delay?
+<p>they should have any votes at all.  All that is necessary<lb/> is that they should have communication of<lb/>every thing that is done, and make <add>enter a</add> declaration<lb/>each of them with regard to every act of his whether<lb/>they approve or disapprove of it.  Such declaration<lb/>they might not only be at liberty to <del><gap/></del> to make<lb/>but obliged to make without having a vote: the communication<lb/>might in ordinary cases be made to them<lb/>before the <del>act</del> issuing the order, but in cases requiring<lb/>particular dispatch not till afterwards.  Might<lb/>not such an arrangement be <add>in certain cases</add> a means of obviating<lb/> and <del>certain</del> some <gap/> the dangers of dissention<lb/>and delay?</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Views

JB/087/103/003: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 10:09, 4 February 2020

Navigation

Search