JB/052/001/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/001/001: Difference between revisions

David (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>I have already stated as the proper end<lb/>
<p>I have already <unclear>stated</unclear> as the proper end<lb/>
or object of the system of procedure the accomplishment<lb/>  
or object of the system of procedure the accomplishment<lb/>  
of the <unclear>productions/predictions</unclear> the issuing of which<lb/>
of the <unclear>predictions</unclear> the issuing of which<lb/>
constitutes the business of the substantive laws.<lb/>
constitutes the business of the substantive laws.<lb/>
For the penal branch the application of punishment<lb/>
For the penal branch the application of punishment<lb/>
with its attendant masses of satisfaction in the case<lb/>
with its attendant masses of satisfaction in the case<lb/>
where the <unclear>offence</unclear> imputed has really been committed<lb/>
where the offence imputed has really been committed<lb/>
thus avoiding the employment of such <gap/><lb/>
thus avoiding the employment of such <uclear>overview</unclear><lb/>
measures in the <del>case</del> every case when the<lb/>
measures in the <del>case</del> every case when the<lb/>
<unclear>offence</unclear> imputed has not been committed. In the<lb/>
<unclear>offence</unclear> imputed has not been committed. In the<lb/>
Line 25: Line 24:
correspondent right is not required by the<lb/>\
correspondent right is not required by the<lb/>\
substantive <unclear>laws</unclear>.</p>
substantive <unclear>laws</unclear>.</p>
All these measures both in the penal<lb/>
 
branch and in the civil <gap/> observance of all<lb/>
 
these conditions <unclear>is is</unclear> comprised in one <gap/><lb/>
<p>All these measures both in the penal<lb/>
branch and in the civil the observance of all<lb/>
these conditions <unclear>is is</unclear> comprised in one <unclear>expression</unclear><lb/><gap/>
<hi rend="underline">rendering justice</hi> &#x2014; taking that course in every<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">rendering justice</hi> &#x2014; taking that course in every<lb/>
case which coincides with the track marked <add>traced</add> <gap/><lb/>
case which coincides with the track marked <add>traced</add> out<lb/>
beforehand by the fringes of the substantive <unclear>laws</unclear>.
beforehand by the fringes of the substantive law.</p>




Line 36: Line 37:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:56, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

I have already stated as the proper end
or object of the system of procedure the accomplishment
of the predictions the issuing of which
constitutes the business of the substantive laws.
For the penal branch the application of punishment
with its attendant masses of satisfaction in the case
where the offence imputed has really been committed
thus avoiding the employment of such <uclear>overview</unclear>
measures in the case every case when the
offence imputed has not been committed. In the
Civil branch the collation of the right demanded
in the case where the collation of it is required
by a correspondent provision of the substantive
law the collation of such right & herewith &
thereby the creation of the correspondent group
of obligations thus avoiding the employing these
same coercive measures in the case where the
composition of the group of obligations in question
these words as before the creation of the
correspondent right is not required by the
\ substantive laws.


All these measures both in the penal
branch and in the civil the observance of all
these conditions is is comprised in one expression
rendering justice — taking that course in every
case which coincides with the track marked traced out
beforehand by the fringes of the substantive law.




Identifier: | JB/052/001/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1802-11-21

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

001

Info in main headings field

procedure - ends

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16674

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in