JB/014/076/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/076/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


11 Sept 1814 §7 21
<p>11 Sept 1814 §7 21</p>
Logic or Ethics
<head>Logic or Ethics</head>
Ch Summum bonum
<note>Ch <foreign>Summum bonum</foreign></note>
1 §<gap/> Theoretics
<p>1 <note>§<gap/> Theoretics</note></p>


III. Lastly come a set of people, who, supposing them to
<p>III. Lastly come a set of people, who, supposing them to<lb/>
exist are here called Theoretics. <gap/> It is In It is to contemplation
exist are <add>here</add> called <hi rend="underline">Theoretics</hi>. <del><gap/> It is</del> In <add>It is to</add> contemplation<lb/>
and that where, do these men place look for their summum
and that alone, do these men place <add>look for</add> their <foreign>summum</foreign><lb/>
bonum such as it is: allson
<foreign>bonum</foreign> such as it is:</p>


Contemplation?? To <gap/> obtain the summit of felicity has
<p>Contemplation?? To <del><gap/></del> obtain <add>attain</add> the summit of felicity has<lb/>
a man nothing to do my contemplate? If this be even the case
a man nothing to do but contemplate? If this be <add>ever</add> the case</p>


If the summum bonum were any thing like what
<p>If the <foreign>summum bonum</foreign> were any thing like what<lb/>
it has been said of it, who is there that would not be a
<del>it</del> has been said of it, who is there that would not be a<lb/>
Theoretic. Corde quod habit et habos &#x2014; if there be
Theoretic. <foreign>Corde quod habit et <unclear>habos</unclear></foreign> &#x2014; if there be<lb/>
really a case in which the truth of their position is verified maxim is exemplified
really a case in which <add>the truth of</add> their position is verified <add>maxim is exemplified</add><lb/>
surely it must be this: for between being in every
surely it must be this: for between being in every<lb/>
given degree happy, and <gap/> in that same degree fancying
given degree happy, and <del><gap/></del> in that same degree <del>fancying</del><lb/>
<gap/> self so happy, <gap/> so where, so long as the fancy
<del>one's</del> self so <add>happy</add>, <del><gap/> so</del> where, so long as the fancy<lb/>
lasts &#x2014; where is the difference (let any body say)? <gap/>
lasts &#x2014; where is the difference <add>(let any body say)</add>? <del><gap/></del></p>


Of these men surely may be said, and with no
<p>Of these men surely may be said, and with no<lb/>
less propriety what by Cicero was said of another set
less propriety what by Cicero was said of another set<lb/>
of men. Latin text here, not transcribed. These are a good sort set of
of men. <!-- Latin text here, not transcribed. --> These are a good sort <add>set</add> of<lb/>
men, and forasmuch as such they are in their own
men, and forasmuch as such they are in their own<lb/>
opinion, a blessed one.
opinion, a blessed one.</p>


Not so this our modern Loliaist philosopher. Whatsoever
<p>Not so this <add>our</add> modern <unclear>Loliaist</unclear> <add>philosopher</add>. Whatsoever<lb/>
Happy as they may think themselves Let them think fancy
Happy as they may think themselves Let them <unclear>think</unclear> <add>fancy</add><lb/>
themselves ever so happy, he proves to them that it is
themselves ever so happy, he proves to them that it is<lb/>
no such thing.
no such thing.</p>


We are born to act for action, he says to act for action: and to
<p>We are born to act <add>for action</add>, he says to act <add>for action</add>: and to<lb/>
prove it he calls The Fabrick of our Nature: whereupon
prove it he calls The <sic>Fabrick</sic> of our Nature: whereupon<lb/>
he goes on the observe that therefore the if in such acting
he goes on the observe that therefore <del>the</del> if in such acting<lb/>
no action no action of offices (or for offices say Deities)
no action no action of <hi rend="underline">offices</hi> (or for offices say <hi rend="underline">Deities</hi>)<lb/>
whatsoever he meant to say by action of offices or action
whatsoever he meant to say by action of offices or action<lb/>
of deities, takes place, the highest knowledge in ask
of deities, takes place, the highest knowledge in <gap/><lb/>
or <gap/> is in a certain sort defective, and such
or <gap/> is in a certain sort defective, and such<lb/>
as will be of little service to mankind. Testator <gap/> <gap/>
as will be of little service to mankind. Testator <gap/> &amp;</p>
p.9.
<note>p.9.</note>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:36, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

11 Sept 1814 §7 21

Logic or Ethics Ch Summum bonum

1 § Theoretics

III. Lastly come a set of people, who, supposing them to
exist are here called Theoretics. It is In It is to contemplation
and that alone, do these men place look for their summum
bonum such as it is:

Contemplation?? To obtain attain the summit of felicity has
a man nothing to do but contemplate? If this be ever the case

If the summum bonum were any thing like what
it has been said of it, who is there that would not be a
Theoretic. Corde quod habit et habos — if there be
really a case in which the truth of their position is verified maxim is exemplified
surely it must be this: for between being in every
given degree happy, and in that same degree fancying
one's self so happy, so where, so long as the fancy
lasts — where is the difference (let any body say)?

Of these men surely may be said, and with no
less propriety what by Cicero was said of another set
of men. These are a good sort set of
men, and forasmuch as such they are in their own
opinion, a blessed one.

Not so this our modern Loliaist philosopher. Whatsoever
Happy as they may think themselves Let them think fancy
themselves ever so happy, he proves to them that it is
no such thing.

We are born to act for action, he says to act for action: and to
prove it he calls The Fabrick of our Nature: whereupon
he goes on the observe that therefore the if in such acting
no action no action of offices (or for offices say Deities)
whatsoever he meant to say by action of offices or action
of deities, takes place, the highest knowledge in
or is in a certain sort defective, and such
as will be of little service to mankind. Testator &

p.9.




Identifier: | JB/014/076/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1814-09-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

076

Info in main headings field

logic or ethics

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d21 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

4839

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in