JB/014/378/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/378/001: Difference between revisions

Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


1829. June 6. H 1 Copy.<lb/><head>Article on Utilitarianism.</head><p>(1 14<lb/><note>43.<lb/>Virtue, vice, justice,<lb/>injustice intelligible only<lb/>when referred to one of<lb/>these three principles: --<lb/>1 Great<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> happ<hi rend="superscript">ss.</hi><lb/>2. Asceticism.<lb/>3. Ipsedixitism.<lb/>Explanating these<lb/>3 principles already<lb/>given Ipsedixitism<lb/>pursued by disciples<lb/>of Pythagoras.<lb/><!-- Three additional lines in this note have been stricken --></note><lb/><hi rend="underline">Virtue</hi> &amp; <hi rend="underline">vice</hi>, <hi rend="underline">justice</hi> &amp; <hi rend="underline">injustice</hi> &#x2014; words all of them<lb/>universally employed <add>spoken & written</add> in discourse not altogether so<lb/>universally understood. No otherwise than by reference mode, to<lb/>be made of them or any one of them. Never <add>has any one of them</add> have any been<lb/>employed but reference expressed or implied has been made<lb/>by it to one or other of three principles of say standards of<lb/>right &amp; wrong, namely 1. the great<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> happ<hi rend="superscript">ss.</hi> prin<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi>, 2. the princ<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> of asceticism, wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> is the direct opposite to it, or a<lb/>3<hi rend="superscript">rd</hi> wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> may be denominated the princ<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> of <hi rend="underline">ipsedixitism</hi><lb/>or the <hi rend="underline">ipse dixit</hi> principle. Of the greatest happiness<lb/>principle sufficient explanation has it is hoped<lb/>been given: so likewise of its opposite the principle<lb/>of asceticism, <del><gap/></del> for it is in the nature<lb/>of opposites to afford explanat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of one another. By<lb/>the <hi rend="underline">ipse dixit</hi> princ<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> understand that principle or<lb/>say that commencemen<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> or training reason<hi rend="superscript">g.</hi> wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> does<lb/>not make reference either to <del>the</del> happiness or unhappiness<lb/>as the end in view or standard of right &amp; wrong<lb/>in human conduct: but tacitly or expressly &amp; avowedly<lb/>the opinion the declared opinion &#x2014; of either the writer<lb/>or speaker himself or some other individual named<lb/>or unnamed. This appellative is not a new one invented<lb/>for the present purpose, bt an old one borrowed<lb/>from an antique and consequently high authority. It is<lb/>the principle pursued, so Cicero informs us, by the<lb/>disciples of Pythagoras. <hi rend="underline">Ipse</hi> [referring to Pythagoras] <hi rend="underline">ipse<lb/>dixit</hi>; he has said the matter is so &amp; so, therefore said<lb/>a disciple of the illustrious says so it is.</p>
<p>1829. June 6. H 1 Copy.</p>
<head>Article on Utilitarianism.</head>
 
<p>(1 14<lb/><note>43.<lb/>Virtue, vice, justice,<lb/>injustice intelligible only<lb/>when referred to one of<lb/>these three principles: &#x2014;<lb/>1 Great<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> happ<hi rend="superscript">ss.</hi><lb/>2. Asceticism.<lb/>3. Ipsedixitism.<lb/>Explanating these<lb/>3 principles already<lb/>given Ipsedixitism<lb/>pursued by disciples<lb/>of Pythagoras.<lb/><!-- Three additional lines in this note have been stricken --></note><lb/><hi rend="underline">Virtue</hi> &amp; <hi rend="underline">vice</hi>, <hi rend="underline">justice</hi> &amp; <hi rend="underline">injustice</hi> &#x2014; words all of them<lb/>universally employed <add>spoken &amp; written</add> in discourse not altogether so<lb/>universally understood. No otherwise than by reference made to<lb/>the great<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> happ<hi rend="superscript">ss.</hi> prin<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> can any clear &amp; useful applicat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi><lb/>be made of them or any one of them. Never <add>has any one of them</add> have any been<lb/>employed but reference expressed or implied has been made<lb/>by it to one or other of three principles or say standards of<lb/>right &amp; wrong, namely 1. the great<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> happ<hi rend="superscript">ss.</hi> prin<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi>, 2. the<lb/>princ<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> of asceticism, wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> is the direct opposite to it, or a<lb/>3<hi rend="superscript">rd</hi> wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> may be denominated the princ<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> of <hi rend="underline">ipsedixitism</hi><lb/>or the <hi rend="underline">ipse dixit</hi> principle. Of the greatest happiness<lb/>principle sufficient explanation has it is hoped<lb/>been given: so likewise of its opposite the principle<lb/>of asceticism, <del><gap/></del> for it is in the nature<lb/>of opposites to afford explanat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of one another. By<lb/>the <hi rend="underline">ipse dixit</hi> princ<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> understand that principle or<lb/>say that commencemen<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> or train of reason<hi rend="superscript">g.</hi> wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> does<lb/>not make reference either to <del>the</del> happiness or unhappiness<lb/>as the end in view or standard of right &amp; wrong<lb/>in human conduct: but tacitly or expressly &amp; avowedly<lb/>the opinion &#x2014; the declared opinion &#x2014; of either the writer<lb/>or speaker himself or some other individual named<lb/>or unnamed. This appellative is not a new one invented<lb/>for the present purpose, but an old one borrowed<lb/>from an antique and consequently high authority. It is<lb/>the principle pursued, so Cicero informs us, by the<lb/>disciples of Pythagoras. <hi rend="underline">Ipse</hi> [referring to Pythagoras] <hi rend="underline">ipse<lb/>dixit</hi>; he has said the matter is so &amp; so, therefore said<lb/>a disciple of the illustrious says so it is.</p><p><note>44.<lb/>J. B. w<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi> now substitute<lb/>in his Introd. the prin<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi><lb/>of <hi rend="underline">ipsedixitism</hi> for<lb/>that of sympathy &<lb/>antipathy: it may be<lb/>said to have two branches<lb/>one applying to civil the<lb/>other to penal law: to the<lb/>remuneratory branch<lb/><add>only</add> does it apply.</note><lb/>When Mr. Bentham's Introd. to Mor<hi rend="superscript">s.</hi> etc. above mentioned<lb/>was first published his <sic>veiws</sic> been as clear &amp;<lb/>comprehensive as they are at present this same<lb/><hi rend="underline">ipse dixit</hi> principle or principles of <hi rend="underline">ipse dixit<del>ism</del></hi><lb/>he w<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi> have substituted to his princ<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> of  sympathy &amp;<lb/>antipathy therein mentioned. The <hi rend="underline">ipse dixit</hi> prin<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> may be<lb/>consid<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi> as hav<hi rend="superscript">g.</hi> two branches, the one applying to the<lb/>so-called civil branch of law, the other to the so-called<lb/>penal branch of law. To the penal branch <del>of law</del><lb/>and that alone of law, or rather to that &amp; the rema<add>u</add>natory<lb/>branch together, has the principle of sympathy &amp; antipathy only<lb/>applicat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi>: the affect<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of sympathy being in this case the<lb/>sole inducem<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> for every applicat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> made of the matter<lb/>of reward as such; the affection of antipathy of every applicat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi><lb/>made of the matter of punishm<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi>. The principle of caprice<lb/>was the appellative that afterw<hi rend="superscript">ds.</hi> occurred  to &amp; has been employed</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:37, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1829. June 6. H 1 Copy.

Article on Utilitarianism.

(1 14
43.
Virtue, vice, justice,
injustice intelligible only
when referred to one of
these three principles: —
1 Greatt. happss.
2. Asceticism.
3. Ipsedixitism.
Explanating these
3 principles already
given Ipsedixitism
pursued by disciples
of Pythagoras.

Virtue & vice, justice & injustice — words all of them
universally employed spoken & written in discourse not altogether so
universally understood. No otherwise than by reference made to
the greatt. happss. prine. can any clear & useful applicatn.
be made of them or any one of them. Never has any one of them have any been
employed but reference expressed or implied has been made
by it to one or other of three principles or say standards of
right & wrong, namely 1. the greatt. happss. prine., 2. the
prince. of asceticism, whh. is the direct opposite to it, or a
3rd whh. may be denominated the prince. of ipsedixitism
or the ipse dixit principle. Of the greatest happiness
principle sufficient explanation has it is hoped
been given: so likewise of its opposite the principle
of asceticism, for it is in the nature
of opposites to afford explanatn. of one another. By
the ipse dixit prince. understand that principle or
say that commencement. or train of reasong. whh. does
not make reference either to the happiness or unhappiness
as the end in view or standard of right & wrong
in human conduct: but tacitly or expressly & avowedly
the opinion — the declared opinion — of either the writer
or speaker himself or some other individual named
or unnamed. This appellative is not a new one invented
for the present purpose, but an old one borrowed
from an antique and consequently high authority. It is
the principle pursued, so Cicero informs us, by the
disciples of Pythagoras. Ipse [referring to Pythagoras] ipse
dixit
; he has said the matter is so & so, therefore said
a disciple of the illustrious says so it is.

44.
J. B. wd. now substitute
in his Introd. the prine.
of ipsedixitism for
that of sympathy &
antipathy: it may be
said to have two branches
one applying to civil the
other to penal law: to the
remuneratory branch
only does it apply.

When Mr. Bentham's Introd. to Mors. etc. above mentioned
was first published his veiws been as clear &
comprehensive as they are at present this same
ipse dixit principle or principles of ipse dixitism
he wd. have substituted to his prince. of sympathy &
antipathy therein mentioned. The ipse dixit prine. may be
considd. as havg. two branches, the one applying to the
so-called civil branch of law, the other to the so-called
penal branch of law. To the penal branch of law
and that alone of law, or rather to that & the remaunatory
branch together, has the principle of sympathy & antipathy only
applicatn.: the affectn. of sympathy being in this case the
sole inducemt. for every applicatn. made of the matter
of reward as such; the affection of antipathy of every applicatn.
made of the matter of punishmt.. The principle of caprice
was the appellative that afterwds. occurred to & has been employed




Identifier: | JB/014/378/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1829-06-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

43-44

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

378

Info in main headings field

article on utilitarianism

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1 / f21

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

john flowerdew colls

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

5141

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in