JB/068/375/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/068/375/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/068/375/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/068/375/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1826 May 5<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Penal Code</head><note>Ch. XVI Offences affect<hi rend="superscript">g</hi> its Revenue</note></p>
 
<p>One <add>species of</add> offence <hi rend="underline">interception of property</hi> – which comparatively<lb/>
 
speaking makes little figure in the case where an individual<lb/>
 
is the lower, makes a much more ample figure in<lb/>
the case <del><gap/></del> where the public is the loser.  <unclear>Contrabandism</unclear> with<lb/>
all the several offences accessory to it – contrabandism in its application<lb/>
to all the several modes of taxation is but <add>one but</add> a modification<lb/>
of this one denomination of offence.</p>
<p>As to Offences – committed by functionaries as such<lb/>
they are all of them, to many offences against trust, in this<lb/>
case against public trust:  and forasmuch or in the case of<lb/>
private trust the circumstances is applicable to delinquency in<lb/>
all its several modes, so is it in the case of public trust.<lb/>
If <del>the</del> by the circumstance of trusteeship the mischievousness of<lb/>
the offence is <unclear>neither</unclear> diminished than increased in the man when<lb/>
the trust is of a private nature, so for the <unclear>rest</unclear> above assigned<lb/>
is it still more diminished so far as regards offences affecting<lb/>
property by the circumstance of <unclear>like</unclear> trust being a public trust.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:16, 25 November 2024

Click Here To Edit

1826 May 5
Penal CodeCh. XVI Offences affectg its Revenue

One species of offence interception of property – which comparatively
speaking makes little figure in the case where an individual
is the lower, makes a much more ample figure in
the case where the public is the loser. Contrabandism with
all the several offences accessory to it – contrabandism in its application
to all the several modes of taxation is but one but a modification
of this one denomination of offence.

As to Offences – committed by functionaries as such
they are all of them, to many offences against trust, in this
case against public trust: and forasmuch or in the case of
private trust the circumstances is applicable to delinquency in
all its several modes, so is it in the case of public trust.
If the by the circumstance of trusteeship the mischievousness of
the offence is neither diminished than increased in the man when
the trust is of a private nature, so for the rest above assigned
is it still more diminished so far as regards offences affecting
property by the circumstance of like trust being a public trust.


Identifier: | JB/068/375/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 68.

Date_1

1826-05-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

5-6

Box

068

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

375

Info in main headings field

penal code

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d2 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

22570

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in