★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
' | <!-- part of heading and margin notes in pencil --> <head>1820 <sic>Feb.</sic> 1<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <p> § 8 (2)<lb/><note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/><!-- in pencil -->Text or Note? <note>§ 8 J.B.'s Conclusion <add><gap/></add></note></p> <p>Text in Note?</p> <p>Without prejudice to their independency, the people when in<lb/>contest with their government — as every people will <add>now</add> be till<lb/>either democracy or democratic ascendency is established —<lb/>may and therefore should obtain if they can support in<lb/>all shapes from <del>every</del> the members of any and every foreign<lb/>community: and this without any other than this obvious reserve<lb/>namely to make sure that so far as concerns proofs, the<lb/>number of their supporters is not so great as to overpower them.<lb/>Thus it was that without <del>the</del> prejudice or design to the interests of his<lb/>party Henry the fourth of France derived from Elizabeth of England<lb/><del>the <gap/> was</del> as efficient an assistance. Thus it was that on the<lb/>other hand the members of the League derived similar support<lb/>from <del>the</del> Philip of Spain, enemy to the King when the <add>French</add> Nation<lb/>preference, and thereby <add>so far</add> in the nation but on that very account<lb/>natural ally and <gap/> friend to the causes of those by whom he<lb/>was called in. We be the people also on occasions such as this<lb/>suffer themselves to be deluded by <add>words</add> the <sic>fascimilies</sic> <add><gap/></add> of names. Now<lb/>from <add>Monarchical or</add> Aristocratical craft <add>hypocrisy</add> failed to take advantage of it. <unclear>Shorter</unclear><lb/>uses the <add>sentimentality of</add> historian Dalrymple — <unclear>Shorter</unclear> forsooth as if <del><gap/></del> a son of<lb/>his had been found a coward shocked at the discovery or supposed<lb/>discovery that Sidney and Russel in their contest against tyranny<lb/>had receipt of French gold! as if a piece of gold <del>could</del><lb/>would go less far in the <gap/> of arms for defence against<lb/>tyranny from the having come from France. Now on the other<lb/>hand the witness is the hypocrisy of the Whigs, also because <del><gap/></del><lb/>it was to Sidney and <add>then</add> Russel that the evidence pointed, <gap/> <lb/> not to believe it</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1820 Feb. 1
Radicalism not dangerous
§ 8 (2)
III Experience
II Ireland
Text or Note? § 8 J.B.'s Conclusion
Text in Note?
Without prejudice to their independency, the people when in
contest with their government — as every people will now be till
either democracy or democratic ascendency is established —
may and therefore should obtain if they can support in
all shapes from every the members of any and every foreign
community: and this without any other than this obvious reserve
namely to make sure that so far as concerns proofs, the
number of their supporters is not so great as to overpower them.
Thus it was that without the prejudice or design to the interests of his
party Henry the fourth of France derived from Elizabeth of England
the was as efficient an assistance. Thus it was that on the
other hand the members of the League derived similar support
from the Philip of Spain, enemy to the King when the French Nation
preference, and thereby so far in the nation but on that very account
natural ally and friend to the causes of those by whom he
was called in. We be the people also on occasions such as this
suffer themselves to be deluded by words the fascimilies of names. Now
from Monarchical or Aristocratical craft hypocrisy failed to take advantage of it. Shorter
uses the sentimentality of historian Dalrymple — Shorter forsooth as if a son of
his had been found a coward shocked at the discovery or supposed
discovery that Sidney and Russel in their contest against tyranny
had receipt of French gold! as if a piece of gold could
would go less far in the of arms for defence against
tyranny from the having come from France. Now on the other
hand the witness is the hypocrisy of the Whigs, also because
it was to Sidney and then Russel that the evidence pointed,
not to believe it
|
Identifier: | JB/137/351/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1820-02-01 |
|||
|
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
351 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
001 |
text or note? |
||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]] |
||
|
arthur wellesley, duke of wellington |
|||
|
1818 |
|||
|
47068 |
|||
