JB/072/194/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/072/194/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/194/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/194/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>C <lb/>
Offences against one's Self. Paederasty<lb/></head>
 
<p>in favour of it) <add>upon the subject</add> without taking notice of that circumstance.<lb/></p>
 
A notion more obvious, but perhaps not much <lb/> <note>Whether it hurts population?</note>
better founded than the former is that of it's being <lb/>
prejudicial to population. <add>[+]</add> <note>Pr. Jus. 3</note> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Voltaire appears disposed<lb/>
<hi rend="superscript">inclined</hi> in one part of his works to give <unclear>some</unclear><lb/>
countenance to this opinion.  He speaks of it as a <lb/>
vice which would be [the destruction of, or at least would<lb/>
be] destructive to the human race if it were general.<lb/>
<foreign>Comment s'est-il <unclear>pu</unclear> faire qu'un vice destructeur <lb/>
du genre humain, s'il etait general; qu'un <lb/>
<unclear>attentat</unclear> <lb/>
infame contre la nation, soit pourtant si <lb/>
naturel?<add>+</add></foreign>.<note><foreign>Questions sur l'Encyclop. Amour Socratique.</foreign></note> <del><gap/></del> A little further on speaking of <lb/>
<unclear>Sextus</unclear> Empiricus who would have us believe that the <lb/>
<sic>practise</sic> was "recommended" <del><gap/></del> in Persia by the laws, <lb/>
he insists that the effect of such a law would be to <lb/>
annihilate that human race if it were literally <lb/>
observed. "Non, <add>(says he)</add> il n'est pas dans la nature humaine <lb/>
"de faire une loi qui contredit, &amp; qui outrage la <lb/>
"nature, une loi qui <unclear>ancontirait</unclear> le genre-humain <lb/>
"si elle etait observee a la lettre."  This consequence <lb/>
however is far enough from being a necessary one. <lb/>
For a law of the purport he represents to be observed, it <lb/>
is sufficient that this unprolific kind of venery be practiced:<lb/>
it is not necessary that it should be practised to<lb/>
the exclusion of that which is prolific. <hi rend="superscript">Now</hi> That there<lb/>
should ever be wanting such a measure of the regular<lb/>
and ordinary inclination of desire for the proper object as<lb/>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:07, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

C
Offences against one's Self. Paederasty

in favour of it) upon the subject without taking notice of that circumstance.

A notion more obvious, but perhaps not much
Whether it hurts population? better founded than the former is that of it's being
prejudicial to population. [+] Pr. Jus. 3 Mr Voltaire appears disposed
inclined in one part of his works to give some
countenance to this opinion. He speaks of it as a
vice which would be [the destruction of, or at least would
be] destructive to the human race if it were general.
Comment s'est-il pu faire qu'un vice destructeur
du genre humain, s'il etait general; qu'un
attentat
infame contre la nation, soit pourtant si
naturel?+
.Questions sur l'Encyclop. Amour Socratique. A little further on speaking of
Sextus Empiricus who would have us believe that the
practise was "recommended" in Persia by the laws,
he insists that the effect of such a law would be to
annihilate that human race if it were literally
observed. "Non, (says he) il n'est pas dans la nature humaine
"de faire une loi qui contredit, & qui outrage la
"nature, une loi qui ancontirait le genre-humain
"si elle etait observee a la lettre." This consequence
however is far enough from being a necessary one.
For a law of the purport he represents to be observed, it
is sufficient that this unprolific kind of venery be practiced:
it is not necessary that it should be practised to
the exclusion of that which is prolific. Now That there
should ever be wanting such a measure of the regular
and ordinary inclination of desire for the proper object as




Identifier: | JB/072/194/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

072

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

194

Info in main headings field

offences against one's self - paederasty

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f14 / / f16

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23811

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in