JB/159/002/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/159/002/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/002/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/002/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>8 March 1811</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Punishment.  Ch.1. Definitions and Distinctions</head>
 
<p>&sect; <!-- pencil -->3.  Evil mediately intentional <unclear>Affines</unclear></p>
 
<p>27<lb/>
 
Most common cases of<lb/>
punishment, those in<lb/>
which the evil is not<lb/>only <hi rend="underline">ultimately</hi> but <add>only</add> <hi rend="underline">mediately</hi><lb/>
intentional.  p.10.</p>
<p>28.<lb/>
In these cases ultimately<lb/>
intentional, result<lb/>
a negative or a positive act.  p.10.</p>
<p>29.<lb/>
Offence positive, object<lb/>
of punishment negative,<lb/>
and vice versa.<lb/>
Positive &amp; negative not<lb/>
less important in law,<lb/>
especially penal, than<lb/>
in electricity &amp; galvanism.  p10</p>
<p><del>30.</del></p>
<pb/>
<p>&sect; <!-- pencil -->3.  Evil mediately intentional <unclear>Affines</unclear></p>
<p>30<lb/>
Affines to punishment<lb/>
I –Where the offence is<lb/>
positive.
1.  Amendment or reformation<lb/>
2.  Disablement, relative<lb/>
3.  Determent (by example)<lb/>
4.  Self defence<lb/>
5.  Self-preservation.<lb/>
6.  Safe custody.<lb/>
7.  Restraint.</p>
<p>31<lb/>
II – Where the offence<lb/>
is negative
8.1.  Compulsion or restraint<lb/>
9.2.  Torture.<lb/>
10.3.  Compensation<lb/>
(satisfaction pecuniary<lb/>
exaction of)<lb/>
11.4.  Taxation.</p>
<p>32<lb/>
III – Whether the offence<lb/>
be positive or negative.<lb/>
12.1.  Coercion.<lb/>
13.2.  Obligation.<lb/>
14.3.  Burthen imposition<lb/>
of –</p>
<pb/>
<p>&sect;. <!-- pencil -->4.  Uses of the distinction</p>
<p>33 or 1<lb/>
Practical use of marking<lb/>
out the distinction between<lb/>
punishment and the<lb/>
other purposes to which<lb/>
its matter is applicable.  p.13.<lb/>
1.  That having in his<lb/>
eye all the several objects<lb/>
legislator may make<lb/>
due provision for each<lb/>
viz. 1. sufficient, 2. not more  p.13.</p>
<p>34 or 2.<lb/>
2. – that where, for any<lb/>
two or more, one lot of<lb/>
evil may suffice more<lb/>
may not be employed.  p.13.</p>
<p>35 or 3.<lb/>
3. – that in each instance<lb/>
his view of the<lb/>
means compared with<lb/>
the end may be correct<lb/>
and compleat enough<lb/>
to judge of the prospect<lb/>
of attaining the end. p.14</p>
<p>36 or 4.<lb/>
4. – To guard him<lb/>
against being misled<lb/>
by <del>a statement</del> the rhetorical<lb/>
artifice which<lb/>
consists in substituting<lb/>
to the name of the proper<lb/>
object or result that of<lb/>
some other the name of<lb/>
which is more or less popular.  p.14.</p>
<p>37. or 5<lb/>
5.  Lest by the means employed<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">one</hi> of these results<lb/>
be not produced <hi rend="underline">instead</hi> of<lb/>
or beyond the intention<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">along with</hi>, another.  p.14</p>
<p>Taxation – prohibition<lb/>
<unclear>means</unclear> prevention<lb/>
6.  To guard him against<lb/>
being misled by their names<lb/>
so as to deem unfit to be <unclear>named</unclear><lb/>
a fit object or is a <gap/>,<lb/>
or to set the attainment<lb/>
of it at too high or two low<lb/>
<gap/></p>
<pb/>
<p>&sect;.<!-- pencil -->4. Uses of this distinction</p>
<p>34<hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> or 2<hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> continued<lb/>
1.  Examples – Assault.<lb/>
In self-defence, as much<lb/>
punishment inflicted<lb/>
on the offender by the party<lb/>
injured as, had none<lb/>
been so inflicted the<lb/>
Judge would have deemed<lb/>
proper for himself<lb/>
to inflict:  What is<lb/>
enough for punishment<lb/>
having thus been already<lb/>
inflicted in self defence,<lb/>
the Judge needs not<lb/>
ought not to inflict<lb/>
more.  p 15</p>
<p>35<hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> or 4<hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi><lb/>
1.  Tendency to misapply<lb/>
the word punishment<lb/>
for rhetorical<lb/>
purposes.  p.16</p>
<p>36<hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> or 4<hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> cont.<lb/>
2  By such application<lb/>
proper or improper<lb/>
whatever addition<lb/>
may be made to the<lb/>
disposition none is<lb/>
made to the reason of<lb/>
such disapproval.  p.17.</p>
<p>37 or 5<lb/>
1.  Example vice prevention,<lb/>
taxation with licence;  vice contribution<lb/>
through taxation, prevention<lb/>
through prohibition.<lb/>
2.  For a parallel, purposes<lb/>
to which matter<lb/>
of reward is applicable.<lb/>
3.  <hi rend="underline">Uses</hi>, the same<lb/>
in that case.<lb/>
4.  Reason for economy,<lb/>
matter of reward<lb/>
(pecuniary especially<lb/>
of which sort is the greatest<lb/>
part) though not<lb/>
itself evil has proportinable<lb/>
evil for its<lb/>
cause.  p.18.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:03, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

8 March 1811

Punishment. Ch.1. Definitions and Distinctions

§ 3. Evil mediately intentional Affines

27
Most common cases of
punishment, those in
which the evil is not
only ultimately but only mediately
intentional. p.10.

28.
In these cases ultimately
intentional, result
a negative or a positive act. p.10.

29.
Offence positive, object
of punishment negative,
and vice versa.
Positive & negative not
less important in law,
especially penal, than
in electricity & galvanism. p10

30.


---page break---

§ 3. Evil mediately intentional Affines

30
Affines to punishment
I –Where the offence is
positive. 1. Amendment or reformation
2. Disablement, relative
3. Determent (by example)
4. Self defence
5. Self-preservation.
6. Safe custody.
7. Restraint.

31
II – Where the offence
is negative 8.1. Compulsion or restraint
9.2. Torture.
10.3. Compensation
(satisfaction pecuniary
exaction of)
11.4. Taxation.

32
III – Whether the offence
be positive or negative.
12.1. Coercion.
13.2. Obligation.
14.3. Burthen imposition
of –


---page break---

§. 4. Uses of the distinction

33 or 1
Practical use of marking
out the distinction between
punishment and the
other purposes to which
its matter is applicable. p.13.
1. That having in his
eye all the several objects
legislator may make
due provision for each
viz. 1. sufficient, 2. not more p.13.

34 or 2.
2. – that where, for any
two or more, one lot of
evil may suffice more
may not be employed. p.13.

35 or 3.
3. – that in each instance
his view of the
means compared with
the end may be correct
and compleat enough
to judge of the prospect
of attaining the end. p.14

36 or 4.
4. – To guard him
against being misled
by a statement the rhetorical
artifice which
consists in substituting
to the name of the proper
object or result that of
some other the name of
which is more or less popular. p.14.

37. or 5
5. Lest by the means employed
one of these results
be not produced instead of
or beyond the intention
along with, another. p.14

Taxation – prohibition
means prevention
6. To guard him against
being misled by their names
so as to deem unfit to be named
a fit object or is a ,
or to set the attainment
of it at too high or two low


---page break---

§.4. Uses of this distinction

34(a) or 2(a) continued
1. Examples – Assault.
In self-defence, as much
punishment inflicted
on the offender by the party
injured as, had none
been so inflicted the
Judge would have deemed
proper for himself
to inflict: What is
enough for punishment
having thus been already
inflicted in self defence,
the Judge needs not
ought not to inflict
more. p 15

35(a) or 4(a)
1. Tendency to misapply
the word punishment
for rhetorical
purposes. p.16

36(a) or 4(a) cont.
2 By such application
proper or improper
whatever addition
may be made to the
disposition none is
made to the reason of
such disapproval. p.17.

37 or 5
1. Example vice prevention,
taxation with licence; vice contribution
through taxation, prevention
through prohibition.
2. For a parallel, purposes
to which matter
of reward is applicable.
3. Uses, the same
in that case.
4. Reason for economy,
matter of reward
(pecuniary especially
of which sort is the greatest
part) though not
itself evil has proportinable
evil for its
cause. p.18.


Identifier: | JB/159/002/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

1811-03-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

27-32, 33 or 1 - 37 or 5, 34a or 2a, 36a or 4a

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

002

Info in main headings field

punishment ch. 1 definitions and distinctions

Image

001

Titles

evil mediately intentional / uses of these distinctions

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d2

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

53825

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in