JB/159/138/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/159/138/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/138/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/138/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>10</p>
<p><head>Punishment</head><lb/>
<note>Ins. Religion</note></p>
<p>punishment of Death on <del>any man</del> <gap/> for<lb/>
example:  Why? because <gap/> never gave<lb/>
her consent to the Law which inflicts that<lb/>
punishment for the offence in question.  If this<lb/>
be a reason, for the same reason it is not lawful<lb/>
to inflict on him any other punishment.</p>
<p>If it be immaterial whether a man <del>consented</del> <add>did or did not</add> consent<lb/>
to the <add>establishment of the</add> punishment in question, still more<lb/>
immaterial must it be if possible whether <del>he<lb/>
in</del><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> if in point of fact he did give such consent, it was <hi rend="underline">right</hi>, it was <hi rend="underline">lawful</hi> as the phrase is</note> it was lawful <add>allowable</add> for him to have given <add>give</add> it.</p>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><del>Because his intended and very justly that</del>  Those<lb/>
 
<add>however</add> who hold <unclear>precede</unclear> to be unlawful <add>unallowable</add> must<lb/>
I think as Beccaria intimates<hi rend="superscript">†</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">†</hi> &sect;.16. French edit.</note> hold the<lb/>
negative.</p>
<p><del>How many and what other</del> <add>I know of no other modes of</add> punishment <del>may</del> <add>in</add><lb/>
<del>be</del> <add>particular that have been</add> objected to on the score of Religion.  <del>It is</del> <add>How</add><lb/>
<del>impossible to say</del> and many and what punishments<lb/>
might be objected to on that score,<lb/>
it is impossible for me <add>or I think for any one <del>to say</del></add> to say.  Religious notions,<lb/>
when not regulated by utility, having<lb/>
<add>nothing</add> to do with reason, be not within the grasp<lb/>
of reason.  [It is as impossible for any one <add>Reason is as unable to explore as to explode<lb/>
them</add> to explore them <hi rend="underline">a priori</hi> by the help <add>means</add> of reason<lb/>
as to explode them.]  Thus much we may<lb/>
venture to say of them in the lump, that <del>they</del><lb/>
be they what they may they can deserve no regard<lb/>
<add>and</add></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:03, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

10

Punishment
Ins. Religion

punishment of Death on any man for
example: Why? because never gave
her consent to the Law which inflicts that
punishment for the offence in question. If this
be a reason, for the same reason it is not lawful
to inflict on him any other punishment.

If it be immaterial whether a man consented did or did not consent
to the establishment of the punishment in question, still more
immaterial must it be if possible whether he
in
if in point of fact he did give such consent, it was right, it was lawful as the phrase is it was lawful allowable for him to have given give it.

Because his intended and very justly that Those
however who hold precede to be unlawful unallowable must
I think as Beccaria intimates §.16. French edit. hold the
negative.

How many and what other I know of no other modes of punishment may in
be particular that have been objected to on the score of Religion. It is How
impossible to say and many and what punishments
might be objected to on that score,
it is impossible for me or I think for any one to say to say. Religious notions,
when not regulated by utility, having
nothing to do with reason, be not within the grasp
of reason. [It is as impossible for any one Reason is as unable to explore as to explode
them
to explore them a priori by the help means of reason
as to explode them.] Thus much we may
venture to say of them in the lump, that they
be they what they may they can deserve no regard
and



Identifier: | JB/159/138/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

138

Info in main headings field

popularity

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f9 / f10 / f11 / f12

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

53961

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in