JB/159/197/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/159/197/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/197/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/197/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>17</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><head>Imprisonment examined.</head></p>
 
<p>If any punishment <add>that is at all calculated to be efficacious</add> can in itself be popular,<lb/>
 
[independently of it's connection in the way of<lb/>
 
analogy with the offence] [I imagine it must<lb/>
be this] this I think promises to be so.  It bears <add>comes</add><lb/>
<del>upon it more than any other</del> <add>nearer than an other to the character</add> a stronger resemblance<lb/>
than any other to Domestic discipline.<lb/>
The tendency which it is seen to have to bring the<lb/>
offender<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> to hold his misconduct in aversion and <del>by that means</del> <add>thence</add> to be convinced in a manner</note> <add>by hating the offence</add> [to be out of humour to acknowledge <add>be <unclear>con</unclear></add>] the<lb/>
justice of the sentence, gives it <add>cloaths it</add> the character of Equaity<lb/>
in the <del>mind</del> imaginations of mankind.  This is exactly<lb/>
the object which an indulgent parent has<lb/>
in view in the punishment of his children.</p>
<p>The anxiety men express <add>entertain</add> to obtain that confirmation of<lb/>
the Justice of their proceedings which is afforded<lb/>
by the assent of him who is the victim of them,<lb/>
breaks out <add>shews itself</add> [in various shapes] on <del>in some</del> <add>a variety of</add> occasions.<lb/>
Actuated by this propensity, [Judges under the Civil<lb/>
Law] the Roman Lawyers established the practise<lb/>
of torturing a convicted criminal for the purpose<lb/>
of extorting from him a <add>forcing him to a</add> convession.  Thus also under<lb/>
own Law the practice was till abolished by a<lb/>
late act, to torture a culprit till he confessed<lb/>
the right <del>which</del> <add>if [assumed by]</add> the Court <del>assumed</del> to try him.</p>
<p>To the same propensity we may impute in some<lb/>
degree the industry which is generally employ'd<lb/>
by the Ordinary to obtain <del>a</del> confessions from convicts<lb/>
by the influence of his profession.  [Two sentiments<lb/>
<add>of</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:22, 6 September 2021

Click Here To Edit

17

Imprisonment examined.

If any punishment that is at all calculated to be efficacious can in itself be popular,
[independently of it's connection in the way of
analogy with the offence] [I imagine it must
be this] this I think promises to be so. It bears comes
upon it more than any other nearer than an other to the character a stronger resemblance
than any other to Domestic discipline.
The tendency which it is seen to have to bring the
offender to hold his misconduct in aversion and by that means thence to be convinced in a manner by hating the offence [to be out of humour to acknowledge be con] the
justice of the sentence, gives it cloaths it the character of Equaity
in the mind imaginations of mankind. This is exactly
the object which an indulgent parent has
in view in the punishment of his children.

The anxiety men express entertain to obtain that confirmation of
the Justice of their proceedings which is afforded
by the assent of him who is the victim of them,
breaks out shews itself [in various shapes] on in some a variety of occasions.
Actuated by this propensity, [Judges under the Civil
Law] the Roman Lawyers established the practise
of torturing a convicted criminal for the purpose
of extorting from him a forcing him to a convession. Thus also under
own Law the practice was till abolished by a
late act, to torture a culprit till he confessed
the right which if [assumed by] the Court assumed to try him.

To the same propensity we may impute in some
degree the industry which is generally employ'd
by the Ordinary to obtain a confessions from convicts
by the influence of his profession. [Two sentiments
of


Identifier: | JB/159/197/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

197

Info in main headings field

imprisonment examined

Image

001

Titles

popularity / forced continence

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f17 / f18 / f19 / f20

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

54020

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in