JB/159/267/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/159/267/003: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/267/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/267/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>119)</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><head>CRIT. JUR. CRIM.</head></p>
 
<p> species of any real one.  <del>By</del> Prevention then<lb/>
 
when I speak of it as under the name of an end<lb/>
 
of Punishment I use for shortness sake.  <add>Displayed</add> At length<lb/>
my meaning is that it is the benefits i:e: the <add>negative</add> pleasures<lb/>
<del>positive or negative</del> which the Law occasions<lb/>
by preventing mischief i:e: pains is the chance of<lb/>
them that are the benefits it has in view when it<lb/>
<del>conducts itself But is</del> <add>punishes:  <del>when it punish</del> literally speaking</add> when Legislators or Judges<lb/>
<del>conduct their <gap/> its other</del> punish.</p>
<p>I do not expect that this notion by which Reformation<lb/>
is reduced to Prevention should immediately received<lb/>
by every body.  Prevention they will say, regards<lb/>
only the external conduct.  Reformation regards<lb/>
the inward disposition.  Prevention they will go on<lb/>
in their figurative language, only stops the hand:  it<lb/>
is Reformation that amends (corrects the <del>mind</del> <unclear>vicious</unclear><lb/>
disposition of) the heart.  But this mode of speaking <add>distinction between</add><lb/>
external conduct &amp; internal disposition, between hand &amp; heart<lb/>
when examined will turn out to be more showy<lb/>
than substantial.  A man's disposition is <add>to the public at least</add> no farther<lb/>
of any consequence than as his acts are the result<lb/>
of it.  A man's conduct throughout life being given,<lb/>
whether his disposition be good or bad (make no difference.)
is to the society a matter of indifference.  <del>If</del> To<lb/>
suppose what is next to a contradiction, that <del>no man</del> <add>it was</add><lb/>
in the nature of things for a mans acts to be at variances<lb/>
with his disposition, what the bsiness of the regulator<lb/>
to endeavour is to produce in man a bad<lb/>
disposition.  In truth it is only from a man's acts<lb/>
that <del>a man</del> his disposition can be judged of:  or<lb/>
indeed to speak out:  it is a man's action, only that <add>and all <gap/></add><lb/>
exist:  his disposition is but a fictitious entity.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:04, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

119)

CRIT. JUR. CRIM.

species of any real one. By Prevention then
when I speak of it as under the name of an end
of Punishment I use for shortness sake. Displayed At length
my meaning is that it is the benefits i:e: the negative pleasures
positive or negative which the Law occasions
by preventing mischief i:e: pains is the chance of
them that are the benefits it has in view when it
conducts itself But is punishes: when it punish literally speaking when Legislators or Judges
conduct their its other punish.

I do not expect that this notion by which Reformation
is reduced to Prevention should immediately received
by every body. Prevention they will say, regards
only the external conduct. Reformation regards
the inward disposition. Prevention they will go on
in their figurative language, only stops the hand: it
is Reformation that amends (corrects the mind vicious
disposition of) the heart. But this mode of speaking distinction between
external conduct & internal disposition, between hand & heart
when examined will turn out to be more showy
than substantial. A man's disposition is to the public at least no farther
of any consequence than as his acts are the result
of it. A man's conduct throughout life being given,
whether his disposition be good or bad (make no difference.) is to the society a matter of indifference. If To
suppose what is next to a contradiction, that no man it was
in the nature of things for a mans acts to be at variances
with his disposition, what the bsiness of the regulator
to endeavour is to produce in man a bad
disposition. In truth it is only from a man's acts
that a man his disposition can be judged of: or
indeed to speak out: it is a man's action, only that and all
exist: his disposition is but a fictitious entity.


Identifier: | JB/159/267/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

267

Info in main headings field

crit. jur. crim

Image

003

Titles

punishment / compensation / reformation nothing but prevention / prevention how an end

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d117 / d118 / d119 / d120

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown] propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

in 2 pieces

ID Number

54090

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in