★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/014/057/001" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>Logic or Ethics</head> | <head>Logic or Ethics</head> | ||
<note>Ch <foreign>Summum bonum</foreign></note | <p>9 Sept 1814. A. §. 1. 1.</p> | ||
<note>Ch. <foreign>Summum bonum</foreign>.</note> | |||
<p><unclear>Etter</unclear> Compared p.9<lb/> | <note>§. 1. General <gap/>.</note> | ||
1. <unclear>Idea Born</unclear>. | |||
2. <foreign> | <p><unclear>Etter</unclear> Compared p. 9.<lb/> | ||
1. <foreign><unclear>Idea Born</unclear>. Platonice & Academies—<unclear><gap/> visiam.</foreign> A fraction Due</unclear>.<lb/> | |||
2. <foreign>Solus Virtulis habitus, <gap/>. 3. Ipsa Virtus.</foreign> Compared. <foreign>Ad <gap/>.</foreign><lb/> | |||
<!-- 4 more lines of Latin not transcribed --></p> | <!-- 4 more lines of Latin not transcribed --></p> | ||
<p>The expression ambiguous. 1. The greatest good? then others should not be passed<lb/> | <p>The expression ambiguous. 1. The greatest good? then others should not be passed<lb/> | ||
by. 2. The only good? — then others are worth nothing. This argument <add> | by. 2. The only good? — then others are worth nothing. This argument <add>crude argument</add><lb/> | ||
has no <sic>fixt</sic> object —<lb/> | has no <sic>fixt</sic> object—<lb/> | ||
Anti-Epicurean quarrellers with their bread & butter.</p> | |||
<p>§. Summum bonum. <add> | <p>§. Summum bonum. <add><del>solemn nonsense</del></add> <add>one of the drivellers</add> of the Philosophers of antiquity.</p> | ||
<p> | <p>What <hi rend="underline">well-being</hi> is has been seen: <del>the balance between</del><lb/> | ||
<del>thing</del> in the instance of the individual in question, for and<lb/> | <del>thing</del> in the instance of the individual in question, for and<lb/> | ||
during the length <add>portion</add> of time in question, <del>the</del> what balance there<lb/> | during the length <add>portion</add> of time in question, <del>the</del> what balance there<lb/> | ||
Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
<p>What happiness is has also been seen: any<lb/> | <p>What happiness is has also been seen: any<lb/> | ||
pleasure or combination of <add><unclear>contemporary</unclear></add> pleasures, considered as existing<lb/> | pleasure or combination of <add><unclear>contemporary</unclear></add> pleasures, considered as existing<lb/> | ||
at a high <add>an elevated</add> point, | at a high <add>an elevated</add> point, {<add>though</add> without the possibility of marking it,} in<lb/> | ||
the scale of intensity.</p> | the scale of intensity.</p> | ||
<p> | <p><add>From</add> By <del>these</del> observations such as these, nothing that comes<lb/> | ||
under the | under the name of information can be derived, nothing that<lb/> | ||
comes under | comes under <add>that name</add> the name of information is pretended to be given:<lb/> | ||
no human being so ignorant as not to be informed <del>by</del> <add>of</add> it: informed<lb/> | no human being so ignorant as not to be informed <del>by</del> <add>of</add> it: informed<lb/> | ||
of it by the <del><gap/></del> best master his own experience</p> | of it by the <del><gap/></del> best master his own experience.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
Logic or Ethics
9 Sept 1814. A. §. 1. 1.
Ch. Summum bonum.
§. 1. General .
Etter Compared p. 9.
1. Idea Born. Platonice & Academies—<unclear> visiam. A fraction Due</unclear>.
2. Solus Virtulis habitus, . 3. Ipsa Virtus. Compared. Ad .
The expression ambiguous. 1. The greatest good? then others should not be passed
by. 2. The only good? — then others are worth nothing. This argument crude argument
has no fixt object—
Anti-Epicurean quarrellers with their bread & butter.
§. Summum bonum. solemn nonsense one of the drivellers of the Philosophers of antiquity.
What well-being is has been seen: the balance between
thing in the instance of the individual in question, for and
during the length portion of time in question, the what balance there
has been, if any on the side of pleasure
What happiness is has also been seen: any
pleasure or combination of contemporary pleasures, considered as existing
at a high an elevated point, {though without the possibility of marking it,} in
the scale of intensity.
From By these observations such as these, nothing that comes
under the name of information can be derived, nothing that
comes under that name the name of information is pretended to be given:
no human being so ignorant as not to be informed by of it: informed
of it by the best master his own experience.
Identifier: | JB/014/057/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1814-09-09 |
|||
014 |
deontology |
||
057 |
logic or ethics |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d1 / e1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
4820 |
|||