JB/538/189/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/538/189/002: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/538/189/002" (‎[edit=sysop] (indefinite) ‎[move=sysop] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:
They have adopted the greater part in <hi rend="underline">number</hi> at least if
They have adopted the greater part in <hi rend="underline">number</hi> at least if
<lb/>
<lb/>
not <gap/> in value of my suggestions: but some, the propriety of
not in value of my suggestions: but some, the propriety of
<lb/>
<lb/>
which Wilson Douglas &amp; I joined in looking upon as most incontestable
which Wilson Douglas &amp; I joined in looking upon as most incontestable
Line 25: Line 25:
they appear to have neglected. In the Observations
they appear to have neglected. In the Observations
<lb/>
<lb/>
the passages that I had written against are left out - <add>In the Bill</add> Your
the passages that I had written against are left out&#x2014;<add>In the Bill</add> Your
<lb/>
<lb/>
epithet of "<hi rend="underline">running</hi>" is prefixed to "<hi rend="underline">water</hi>".</p>
epithet of "<hi rend="underline">running</hi>" is prefixed to "<hi rend="underline">water</hi>".</p>
Line 31: Line 31:
<p>No notice is taken of my pamphlet in either of the Monthly
<p>No notice is taken of my pamphlet in either of the Monthly
<lb/>
<lb/>
or Crit. Reviews for last month. - yet Lind says he saw printed
or Crit. Reviews for last month.&#x2014;yet Lind says he saw printed
<lb/>
<lb/>
of early in the month a very commendatory account of it.
of early in the month a very commendatory account of it.
Line 37: Line 37:
Clark the Stationer put into my hands yesterday a very short
Clark the Stationer put into my hands yesterday a very short
<lb/>
<lb/>
but very commendatory account of it in the West'<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Magazine</p>
but very commendatory account of it in the West<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Magazine</p>


<p>I have got a <foreign>Code Russe</foreign> <add>in French</add> published in 1775 or the
<p>I have got a <foreign>Code Russe</foreign> <add>in French</add> published in 1775 or the
Line 51: Line 51:
<p>A Tour to Petersburgh &amp; Moscow 1778 by John Richard
<p>A Tour to Petersburgh &amp; Moscow 1778 by John Richard
<lb/>
<lb/>
- No such person I dare swear - a catchpenny
&#x2014;No such person I dare swear&#x2014;a catchpenny
<lb/>
<lb/>
performance - an imposture. Cooke's Travels I hear have
performance&#x2014;an imposture. Cooke's Travels I hear have
<lb/>
<lb/>
been out these two <add>or three</add> years &#x2014; I will hunt for them in the
been out these two <add>or three</add> years&#x2014;I will hunt for them in the
<lb/>
<lb/>
Reviews.</p>
Reviews.</p>
Line 63: Line 63:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:49, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

A few days ago I received from a copy of the Hard-
-labour Bill as it has been brought into the House, together
with one of Eden's preface in a separate pamphlet under
the title of "Observations" on the above Bill. They were sent
me as a present by Judge Blackstone without any note
but with "From Mr Justice Blackstone" on the outside with
the direction. In the Bill there are various alterations.
They have adopted the greater part in number at least if
not in value of my suggestions: but some, the propriety of
which Wilson Douglas & I joined in looking upon as most incontestable
they appear to have neglected. In the Observations
the passages that I had written against are left out—In the Bill Your
epithet of "running" is prefixed to "water".

No notice is taken of my pamphlet in either of the Monthly
or Crit. Reviews for last month.—yet Lind says he saw printed
of early in the month a very commendatory account of it.
Clark the Stationer put into my hands yesterday a very short
but very commendatory account of it in the Westr Magazine

I have got a Code Russe in French published in 1775 or the
beginning of 1776 in a thinnish 4to It is on many accounts
my delight. Don't let the title frighten you as if it anticipated
us. It is only a plan for the stable putting the Courts of
Justice upon a regular establishment

A Tour to Petersburgh & Moscow 1778 by John Richard
—No such person I dare swear—a catchpenny
performance—an imposture. Cooke's Travels I hear have
been out these two or three years—I will hunt for them in the
Reviews.




Identifier: | JB/538/189/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 538.

Date_1

1778-06-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

538

Main Headings

Folio number

189

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

Correspondence

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in