JB/035/286/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/035/286/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/035/286/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/035/286/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><head>8 June 1808</head></p>
18-Sep-2017 under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend.
<p>What on this occasion he means to insinuate, is<lb/>
 
that if instead of allowing the extraction of the<lb/>
<!-- indent --><head>8 June 1808</head><!-- in pencil -->
<del>and</del> testimony of the parties on one side of the cause<lb/>
<note>Jury <gap/></note><!-- in pencil -->
only as in Equity <add>procedure</add>, and that <del>in the</del> by means<lb/>
<head>6</head><!-- in pencil -->
of epistolary examination only <add>in the epistolary mode</add>, and with the immense<lb/>
 
and delay attached to that mode of procedure<lb/>
<note>//<!-- 2 verticle parallel lines --> <gap/> <gap/></note><!-- in pencil -->
both parties <add>the parties on both sides</add> were examinable in behalf of <add>by</add> each other<lb/>
<p><!-- indent -->What on this occasion he means to insinuate , is
<del>at the time</del> in the oral made only, and at<lb/>
<lb/>
the time of the <hi rend='underline'>trial</hi> that is at the end of the suit<lb/>
&#x2014; that if instead of allowing the extraction of the
or thereabouts, perfection would <add>so far</add> be attained, and <add>a</add> every<lb/>
<lb/>
<add>or</add> thing would be as it should be</p>
<del><gap/></del> listening of the parties on our side of the cause
<p>But in <del>the Courts</del> a Court of Conscience:<lb/>
<lb/>
this and <add>much</add> more is done at the very beginning of the<lb/>
only as in Equity <add>procedure</add> , and that <del>in the</del> by means
suit whence it happens that <add>in that <del>Court</del> theatre of unsophisticated justice</add> between the beginning<lb/>
<lb/>
and end of a suit there is commonly an interval of<lb/>
of <gap/> examination <add>in the <gap/> made</add> only , and with the immense
no more then a few minutes , while in <del>the to set<gap/></del> a<lb/>
<lb/>
suit for the self same <add>individual</add> cause, if carried on in a <lb/>
and delay <gap/> to that made of procedure
Common Law Court the interest would be six,<lb/>
<lb/>
twelve or eighteen months , and in an Equity Court<lb/>
both parties <add>the parties on both sides</add> were asummable in behalf of <add>by</add> each other
<add>one,</add> two or three years.</p>
<lb/>
<p>In <add>By the actual practice of</add> a Court of Equity, <add>two suits being yielding twice as productive <add>much</add> as one</add> only one of two adverse<lb/>
<del>as the <gap/></del> in the oral made only , and at
parties is allowed in <add>one and</add> the sum suit to extract testimony <add>evidence</add><lb/>
<lb/>
from the other; in his supposed perfected practice of<lb/>
the time of the <hi rend='underline'>trial</hi> that is at the end of the suit
a Jury-trial Court , only one half of each party,<lb/>
<lb/>
evidence would come out , viz. that was disadvantageous<lb/>
or thereabouts , <unclear>perfection</unclear> would <add>so far</add> be attained , and <add>a</add> every
to himself. But, in pain of being to a certainty<lb/>
<lb/>
fallacious, every <add>man's</add> testimony must as to all material<lb/>
<add><gap/></add> thing would be as it should be .
points but not only <del><gap/></del> correct <del>and</del> <add>but</add> compleat.  This<lb/>
<lb/></p>
in the only sort of Court it suits him to speak well<lb/>
 
of, <add>and upon his own plan of improved practice</add> it could not be:  this, in every Court of Conscience<lb/>
<p><!-- indented -->But in <del>the Courts</del> a Court of <gap/><!-- looks like 'Conscienc' (with the 'e' not fully formed, if that is, indeed the word) --> ,
it is of course, and in every instance, so far at least<lb/>
<lb/>
as <del>depend</del> it is in the power of a good system of procedure to cause it to be</p>
this and <add>much</add> more is done at the very beginning of the  
<lb/>
suit <unclear><sic>whene</sic></unclear> it happens that <add>in that <del>Court</del> theatre of unsophisticated justice</add> between the beginning
<lb/>
and end of a suit there is commonly an interval of
<lb/>
no more then a few minutes , while in <del>the <gap/> <gap/></del> a
<lb/>
<gap/> for the self same <add>individual</add> cause , if carried on in a  
<lb/>
<gap/> Law Court the interest would be six,
<lb/>
twelve or eighteen months , and in an Equity Court  
<lb/>
<add>one,</add> two or three years.
<lb/></p>
 
<p><!-- indent -->In <del>a<del/> <add>By the <gap/><!-- "certain" ? --> position of</add> Court of Equity, <add>two suits being <add>yeilding</add> twice as productive <add>much</add> as our</add> only one of two adverse
<lb/>
<gap/> is allowed in <add>one and</add> the sum suit to extract <add><unclear><sic>widur</sic></unclear></add> testimony
<lb/>
from the other; in his supposed <unclear>perfuted</unclear> practice of
<lb/>
a Jury - trial Court , only one half of each party,
<lb/>
evidence would come out , viz. that was disadvantageous
<lb/>
to himself.
 
 
<p/>
 
 
 
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:01, 19 November 2021

Click Here To Edit

8 June 1808

What on this occasion he means to insinuate, is
– that if instead of allowing the extraction of the
and testimony of the parties on one side of the cause
only as in Equity procedure, and that in the by means
of epistolary examination only in the epistolary mode, and with the immense
and delay attached to that mode of procedure
both parties the parties on both sides were examinable in behalf of by each other
at the time in the oral made only, and at
the time of the trial that is at the end of the suit
or thereabouts, perfection would so far be attained, and a every
or thing would be as it should be

But in the Courts a Court of Conscience:
this and much more is done at the very beginning of the
suit whence it happens that in that Court theatre of unsophisticated justice between the beginning
and end of a suit there is commonly an interval of
no more then a few minutes , while in the to set a
suit for the self same individual cause, if carried on in a
Common Law Court the interest would be six,
twelve or eighteen months , and in an Equity Court
one, two or three years.

In By the actual practice of a Court of Equity, two suits being yielding twice as productive <add>much as one</add> only one of two adverse
parties is allowed in one and the sum suit to extract testimony evidence
from the other; in his supposed perfected practice of
a Jury-trial Court , only one half of each party,
evidence would come out , viz. that was disadvantageous
to himself. But, in pain of being to a certainty
fallacious, every man's testimony must as to all material
points but not only correct and but compleat. This
in the only sort of Court it suits him to speak well
of, and upon his own plan of improved practice it could not be: this, in every Court of Conscience
it is of course, and in every instance, so far at least
as depend it is in the power of a good system of procedure to cause it to be


Identifier: | JB/035/286/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

1808-06-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

286

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

10879

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in