JB/095/034/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/095/034/001: Difference between revisions

Kmason (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/095/034/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/095/034/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>SUPPLMENTAL Provisions.</head><p><unclear>paragraph</unclear>to take such <unclear>questionable reading</unclear> is omitted to be taken at the first meeting after teh commencment of <unclear>questionable reading</unclear>brought against tehm, <del>unless to </del>unless when Court shall think it fit that as </p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


<head>SUPPLEMENTAL Provisions.</head>


<p>Trustees <del>neglecting</del> <add>omitting</add> to take <add>If any</add> such <del>as are</del> are omitted to be taken<lb/>
<add>it is</add> prescribed in this Act viz: in §. . . . . . . &amp;c.<lb/>
<add>is omitted to be taken</add><lb/>
at the first meeting after the commencement of<lb/>
this Act,<add>+</add> shall pay twice the full costs of the proceedings, <add>in expectation</add> <del>if a Mandamus is granted by the<lb/>
Kg<add>s</add> Bench</del>on <hi rend="underline">any</hi> Writs of Mandamus if the same<lb/>
<del>should be granted by the King's Bench to notify</del><lb/>
brought against them, <del>unless to</del> unless <add>where</add> the Court<lb/>
shall think fit that no Costs at all or lesser Costs<lb/>
shall be given; all such Costs <add>in either case</add> to be levied by <del>Capidus<lb/>
ad satisfaciendum</del> <del>against</del> and paid to the <add>parties</add> persons<lb/>
applying for such Writs.</p>
<p>13*<lb/>
When Mortgages are in Possession, shall they <add>come in the</add> have the<lb/>
<add>place of the Trustees for the</add><lb/>
Penalties forfeited to the use of the Road, or not?</p>
<p>14*<lb/>
Provision for putting Motgagees into Possession<lb/>
wanting&#x2014;Foreclosure by Bill in Equity<lb/>
impracticable on account of the Number of<lb/>
Trustees&#x2014;p<add>r</add> M<add>r</add> Grover.</p>
<p>15*<lb/>
Provisions for separate notification.</p>
<p>It would be an endless &amp; indeed impracticable<lb/>
work to get in Answers for all the Trustees<lb/>
of a Road who frequently indeed a hundred<lb/>
&amp; the same difficulty would be perpetually<lb/>
recurring in the course of the proceedings.</p>
<p>It might be obviated by constituting one<lb/>
person to <hi rend="underline">defend</hi>, as there is constituted by<lb/>
of this Act to <hi rend="underline">sue</hi>&#x2014;the Clerk <add>of the Road</add> for instance,<lb/>
or the Treasurer.</p>
<p>But as the experiences of a Chancery Suit<lb/>
would always cut up a large portion of the<lb/>
Revenues of a Road (already insolvent by<lb/>
the supposition) &amp; might often be the utter <lb/>
ruin of it<add>+</add> <note>&amp; especially as the<lb/>
question behoves to be<lb/>
in general extremely<lb/>
simple,</note> the best method seems to be to<lb/>
give a power <add>authority in the matter</add> to the <del>Justices in General Sessions<lb/>
to give <add>oppos</add> possession to <gap/></del></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

SUPPLEMENTAL Provisions.

Trustees neglecting omitting to take If any such as are are omitted to be taken
it is prescribed in this Act viz: in §. . . . . . . &c.
is omitted to be taken
at the first meeting after the commencement of
this Act,+ shall pay twice the full costs of the proceedings, in expectation if a Mandamus is granted by the
Kgs Bench
on any Writs of Mandamus if the same
should be granted by the King's Bench to notify
brought against them, unless to unless where the Court
shall think fit that no Costs at all or lesser Costs
shall be given; all such Costs in either case to be levied by Capidus
ad satisfaciendum
against and paid to the parties persons
applying for such Writs.

13*
When Mortgages are in Possession, shall they come in the have the
place of the Trustees for the
Penalties forfeited to the use of the Road, or not?

14*
Provision for putting Motgagees into Possession
wanting—Foreclosure by Bill in Equity
impracticable on account of the Number of
Trustees—pr Mr Grover.

15*
Provisions for separate notification.

It would be an endless & indeed impracticable
work to get in Answers for all the Trustees
of a Road who frequently indeed a hundred
& the same difficulty would be perpetually
recurring in the course of the proceedings.

It might be obviated by constituting one
person to defend, as there is constituted by
of this Act to sue—the Clerk of the Road for instance,
or the Treasurer.

But as the experiences of a Chancery Suit
would always cut up a large portion of the
Revenues of a Road (already insolvent by
the supposition) & might often be the utter
ruin of it+ & especially as the
question behoves to be
in general extremely
simple,
the best method seems to be to
give a power authority in the matter to the Justices in General Sessions
to give oppos possession to



Identifier: | JB/095/034/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

11*, 13*-15*

Box

095

Main Headings

Folio number

034

Info in main headings field

supplemental provisions

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

30920

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in