JB/081/262/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/081/262/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/081/262/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/081/262/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>1829 June 6<lb/>Petitions</head> <!-- some in pencil --><p><note><sic>Ultiss<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic><lb/>Supplement</note><lb/>(2) (1) <note>II.  Elucidations<lb/>&sect;.6. Danish Reconciliation<lb/>Invitation by Denmark<lb/>Fredrick of Prussia</note></p> <p><note>24<lb/>On this occasion Denmark<lb/>might look to Prussia<lb/>for an example &#x2014; Frederick<lb/>the Great</note></p> <p>On this occasion not altogether without profit, might<lb/>Denmark look to Prussia.  For effecting this great change, to<lb/>Frederick the Great the will &#x2014; the desire was not wanting.  <del>This</del> In<lb/>his words in more parts than one it stand explicitly declared.<lb/>What was wanting was &#x2014; not the appropriate moral,<lb/>but the appropriate intellectual aptitude:  not to speak of the<lb/>appropriate active aptitude on the part of an <add>the</add> official subordinate<lb/>or Justice Ministers, or some inferior functionary whose law was<lb/>at his command.  <del>I</del> So far as they would not in his conception<lb/>of them be detrimental to his own personal interest, he wished to have<lb/>good laws. But <add>Yet</add> that which he explicitly declares he would not have<lb/>at any rate in black and white attached to his laws &#x2014; was an assortment<lb/>of reasons destined to the conjunct purpose of <del>explaining<lb/>and justifi</del> giving explanation and justification of those same laws:<lb/>Give names (says he) for your laws, the first Advocate that sees<lb/>them standing <add>lying</add> in his way will lay hold of them, pull them to him<lb/><del>and destroy their form</del> and divest them of their efficiency <add>effective force</add>.<lb/>What the Monarch notwithstanding all his sagacity did not see<lb/> was &#x2014; that so far from giving a facility to the mischievous operators<lb/>he was apprehensive of, a rationale was the only sort of protection<lb/>which the nature of things <add>the case</add> <del><gap/> <gap/></del> was capable of providing<lb/>against such attacks  The arguments of the Advocates would by the<lb/>supposition be no better than fallacious &#x2014; false lights: In the <add>and by</add> reason<lb/>in question the nature of the case furnished true lights, the only<lb/>true light <add>picture</add> by which the illusion producible by the false lights could<lb/>be excluded or dispatched.  By the supposition, the laws themselves were<lb/>actually good: but this they could not be but in proportion as<lb/>good reason in support of them had place in the nature of things<lb/>and were capable of being brought <unclear>first</unclear>, and  applied to <add>employed in</add> their support.</p> <p><add>Relation</add></p>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


MN: Danish Reconciliation .... 24 On this occasion dem might look to Prusia for an example ... the Great


On the occasion not altogether without profit, might Denmark lost to Prussia. For effecting this great change, the
Frederich the Great the work the decision was und cranky. ... ...
explicitly declarable. What was wanting was not the appropriate moral but the appropriate intellectual aptitude, not to ... appropriate active apptitude in the push of ... official subordinate ... Jstice Minsters ...
In so far as they would not a .... be detrimental to his own personal interest, he wished to have good laws. But that which he explicitly declare he would not law .... a .... attacked to his laws ... destined in the ... purpose
.... explanation and justification of those same laws.
Give names (says he) for your laws, the first ....
What a Monarch notwithstadnign ...
... apprehension of a rational was te only sort of protection which the nature of things ... capable of providing ...
The arguments of the Advoiate ... supportive to no ...
By the supposition the laws ... actually good: but ... they could not be but in proportion as .... in support of them ... tandem of ...
and applied ...






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:02, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1829 June 6
Petitions

Ultisso
Supplement

(2) (1) II. Elucidations
§.6. Danish Reconciliation
Invitation by Denmark
Fredrick of Prussia

24
On this occasion Denmark
might look to Prussia
for an example — Frederick
the Great

On this occasion not altogether without profit, might
Denmark look to Prussia. For effecting this great change, to
Frederick the Great the will — the desire was not wanting. This In
his words in more parts than one it stand explicitly declared.
What was wanting was — not the appropriate moral,
but the appropriate intellectual aptitude: not to speak of the
appropriate active aptitude on the part of an the official subordinate
or Justice Ministers, or some inferior functionary whose law was
at his command. I So far as they would not in his conception
of them be detrimental to his own personal interest, he wished to have
good laws. But Yet that which he explicitly declares he would not have
at any rate in black and white attached to his laws — was an assortment
of reasons destined to the conjunct purpose of explaining
and justifi
giving explanation and justification of those same laws:
Give names (says he) for your laws, the first Advocate that sees
them standing lying in his way will lay hold of them, pull them to him
and destroy their form and divest them of their efficiency effective force.
What the Monarch notwithstanding all his sagacity did not see
was — that so far from giving a facility to the mischievous operators
he was apprehensive of, a rationale was the only sort of protection
which the nature of things the case was capable of providing
against such attacks The arguments of the Advocates would by the
supposition be no better than fallacious — false lights: In the and by reason
in question the nature of the case furnished true lights, the only
true light picture by which the illusion producible by the false lights could
be excluded or dispatched. By the supposition, the laws themselves were
actually good: but this they could not be but in proportion as
good reason in support of them had place in the nature of things
and were capable of being brought first, and applied to employed in their support.

Relation





Identifier: | JB/081/262/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-06-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

24

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

262

Info in main headings field

petitions

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2 / c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

26049

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in