JB/081/289/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/081/289/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1829 May 31<lb/>Petitions</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p><note><sic>ultiss<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> 4<lb/>Supplement</note><lb/>(2) (4 <note>II Elucidation<lb/>&sect;. Reconciliation</note></p> <p><note>5<lb/>Uses of <del>present</del> this<lb/>mention of the institution</note></p> <p>Now as to the <add>uses and</add> purpose for which mention of it has<lb/>here been made. Position indicative of these uses <add>and purposes</add> are the following</p> <!-- next paragraph crossed through in pencil --> <p><del>Positions which on this occasion present themselves as of</del><lb/>In relation to this <del>Denmark</del> so exemplary institution,<lb/>Positions the establishment of which presents itself as<lb/>affording a promise of being of use, <add>are</add> the following</p> <p><note>1 Important services already<lb/><del>mentioned</del>  <add>rendered</add> by it.</note></p> <p>1. That, by the <add>actually <del><gap/></del> established</add> institution here in question, extensive and important<lb/>has been the service actually rendered to justice.</p> <p><note>2. <del>The</del> <add>That in this institution</add> Personal appearance of<lb/>parties at the outset, the<lb/>principal feature of<lb/>proposed system has<lb/>been for 25 years in<lb/>practice <del>in this institution</del></note></p> <p>(3)<lb/>2. That <del>it is by means of</del> the personal appearance of parties<lb/>in the presence of the Judge at the outset of the cause, <del>that <gap/></del> <add>an arrangement<lb/>which constitutes the principal feature in the here proposed system is</add><lb/>the arrangement by which the principal part of the service <del>thus</del><lb/><add>actually done has</add> been rendered: and that for 25 years the arrangement having<lb/>had place in practice upon a national scale, the nonsensical<lb/>cry of <add>theoretical</add> speculative visionary , is put to silence</p> <p><del>3. That <gap/> <add>by</add> this arrangement a sort of <add>the production of</add> <gap/> good<lb/>effect has been exemplified also of very</del></p> <p><note>3. <add><del>That</del></add> By <del>this arrangement</del> <add>personal appearance</add><lb/>the beneficial effects<lb/>of the institution produced</note></p> <p>(2)<lb/>3. That it is <del>f</del> <add>by</add> this arrangement and no other, that the<lb/><del>good p</del> beneficial effects produced by that institution were produced.</p> <p><note><del>4. <add>That</add> Engrafting that institution<lb/>on existing system<lb/>would <add>not</add> produce no good<lb/>effects equal to the adopting<lb/>the new proposed<lb/>system.</del></note></p> <p><note>4. Beneficial effects of proposed<lb/>system greater than would<lb/>be produced by engrafting this<lb/>Danish institution on the existing<lb/>system</note></p> <p>4. That, by the engrafting of that institution upon the<lb/>procedure practice and judicial establishment of this country<lb/>(England) <add>even</add> supposing it practicable, no good effects equal to those<lb/>promised by the here proposed system could be produced: <del>this<lb/>n</del> the good effects of that institution <add>abundant as they still are</add> being narrowed by imperfections,<lb/>and counter acted by bad effects, which under<lb/>the here proposed system would not have place.</p> <p><note><del>5 That the same country <add>&amp; government</add><lb/>that has adopted this<lb/>institution has also<lb/>5 By De<lb/>granted gratuitous<lb/>justice to those unable<lb/>to purchase it</del></note></p> <p><note>5 By Denmark gratuitous<lb/>justice granted to the indigent</note></p> <p>5. That <add>by</add> the same country and government <del>that</del> by which<lb/>an exemplification has been thus afforded of the production of these<lb/>good effects has also been afforded an example of <del>go</del> <add>gratuitous</add> justice<lb/>rendered <del>gratuitously</del> to individuals so circumstanced as<lb/>not to be able to purchase it:  and thereby of a government<lb/><del>free</del> <add>clear of</add> that reproach with which the government of this country<lb/>(England) is so deeply <add>heavily</add> loaded: the reproach of <add>a mixture of sale and</add> denial of justice<lb/>and that thus, so far as regard <add>in relation</add> to that part of the here proposed<lb/>system which regards the gratuitousness of the scorn proposed <lb/>to be rendered by it is<lb/>the abovementioned nonsensical<lb/>cry is also<lb/>put to silence.</p>
 
[MARGIN NOTES:
 
Elucidation
Reconciliation
5. Uses of [x/present] this creation?of this institution
 
1. Important service already rendered by it.  
2. That is this institution person l appearance of parties at the outset , the principal feature of system, is proposed system has bene for 25 years in practice
 
3. By [x/this arranfgement] [/personal appearance] the beneficial effects of the institution produced
[x'd/4. [^/That] Engrafting that institution on existing system would [^/not] produce good effects equal to the adoption the ... proposed system.]
4. Beneficial effects of proposed system greater than would be produced by engrafting this danish institution on the existing system
 
 
[x/ 5. That the same country ... that has adopted this institution ... also granted gratuition practice ... purchase it....?]
 
5. By Denmark gratuition justice granted to the indigent to ]]]]




Line 27: Line 9:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:02, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1829 May 31
Petitions

ultisso 4
Supplement

(2) (4 II Elucidation
§. Reconciliation

5
Uses of present this
mention of the institution

Now as to the uses and purpose for which mention of it has
here been made. Position indicative of these uses and purposes are the following

Positions which on this occasion present themselves as of
In relation to this Denmark so exemplary institution,
Positions the establishment of which presents itself as
affording a promise of being of use, are the following

1 Important services already
mentioned rendered by it.

1. That, by the actually established institution here in question, extensive and important
has been the service actually rendered to justice.

2. The That in this institution Personal appearance of
parties at the outset, the
principal feature of
proposed system has
been for 25 years in
practice in this institution

(3)
2. That it is by means of the personal appearance of parties
in the presence of the Judge at the outset of the cause, that an arrangement
which constitutes the principal feature in the here proposed system is

the arrangement by which the principal part of the service thus
actually done has been rendered: and that for 25 years the arrangement having
had place in practice upon a national scale, the nonsensical
cry of theoretical speculative visionary , is put to silence

3. That by this arrangement a sort of the production of good
effect has been exemplified also of very

3. That By this arrangement personal appearance
the beneficial effects
of the institution produced

(2)
3. That it is f by this arrangement and no other, that the
good p beneficial effects produced by that institution were produced.

4. That Engrafting that institution
on existing system
would not produce no good
effects equal to the adopting
the new proposed
system.

4. Beneficial effects of proposed
system greater than would
be produced by engrafting this
Danish institution on the existing
system

4. That, by the engrafting of that institution upon the
procedure practice and judicial establishment of this country
(England) even supposing it practicable, no good effects equal to those
promised by the here proposed system could be produced: this
n
the good effects of that institution abundant as they still are being narrowed by imperfections,
and counter acted by bad effects, which under
the here proposed system would not have place.

5 That the same country & government
that has adopted this
institution has also
5 By De
granted gratuitous
justice to those unable
to purchase it

5 By Denmark gratuitous
justice granted to the indigent

5. That by the same country and government that by which
an exemplification has been thus afforded of the production of these
good effects has also been afforded an example of go gratuitous justice
rendered gratuitously to individuals so circumstanced as
not to be able to purchase it: and thereby of a government
free clear of that reproach with which the government of this country
(England) is so deeply heavily loaded: the reproach of a mixture of sale and denial of justice
and that thus, so far as regard in relation to that part of the here proposed
system which regards the gratuitousness of the scorn proposed
to be rendered by it is
the abovementioned nonsensical
cry is also
put to silence.




Identifier: | JB/081/289/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-05-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

5

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

289

Info in main headings field

petitions

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2 / e4 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

street & co

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

antonio alcala galiano

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

26076

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in