JB/063/068/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/063/068/002: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


Classification. Law - Physic
<head>CLASSIFICATION. Law X Physic</head>


[LEFT SIDE NOTE: Dis laurages i nhis Nosologia, Bacon in his Elements of Therapeutics Alecbride - Linnaeus]
<note>Dis Sauvages in his <lb/>
Nosologia, Damin <lb/>
in his Elements of <lb/>
Therapeutics Macbride <lb/>
&#x2014; Linn&aelig;us Q.</note><lb/>


When so much ingenuity has been expanded in
<p>When so much ingenuity has been <add>by industrious</add>expended in<lb/>
giving a systematical arrangement to the discoveries
giving a systematical arrangement to the diseases<lb/>
of the Body Natural,
of the Body Natural,<lb/>
why may not the same course be taken to advantage, with  
why may not the same course be taken to <lb/>
reference to the objects, may be termed accord-
advantage, with Crimes?, <del>the</del> <add>with Crimes</add> which, with <lb/>
ing to the common Metaphor, the diseases
reference to the objects, may be termed according <lb/>
of the Body Politic, or, with reference to
to the common Metaphor, the diseases<lb/>
the p/agents] actors, the diseases of the mind [?] ?
of the Body Politic, or, with reference to<lb/>
And why [u/has] it not been taken?* [*: is a question that may be ready to recur to many]. how
the <add>agents</add> actors, the diseases of the mind?<lb/>
is it that in this & in so many other
And why <hi rend="underline">has</hi> it not been taken?<add>[+]</add> &amp; how<lb/>
respects the p/Science?] Art oif Legislation should have  
<note><add>[+]</add> is a question that <lb/>
[/stood] been so much life indebted to its Porfessors
may be ready to <lb/>
than the art of Leading?
recur to many</note>] is it that in this &amp; in so many other<lb/>
It is because [/neither] the Spirit of Civil/Evil? Tyranny,
respects the <add>Science</add> Art of Legislation should have <lb/>
nor the spirit of Dogmatic Theology which
<add>stood</add> been so much less indebted to its Professors<lb/>
which poisons every thing it touches, have
than the art of Healing?</p>
... eiether separately or in alliance


[top right page]
It is because <add>neither</add> the Spirit of Civil Tyranny, <lb/>
nor the Spirit of Dogmatic Theology which<lb/>
which poisons every thing it touches, have<lb/>
<del>not</del> ether separately or in alliance <lb/>


[/hung] brooded over the latter, as over the former
<pb/>
Science to check the flight of Geniuses,
[/no Burglear] Nothing either from without, or from within
has stood [/???] before the one as before the other
to p/terify from the ????] to prevent the assumption of past procedures? * [*: wheresoever Judgement [/should] depicted from end of the [/whole expansion] [x/???]
with the most unlimited freedom, or
the [/persual of] pursuing them through their abstract consequences.
Accordingly on the well hidden field of the Science
The Tactic proven? [/of the ???] have bestioned? themselves
vigorously on all sides; & if many thinking,
yet remain p.obscure] ill-defined, ill [/arranged] methodised
it may be deemed, to use a distinction
of Ld Bacon's stile imperfection not
homonics. but artis [/from a defect in the num
ber or distinctness in the
memory not either of labour [/???] or
ingenuity in their arrangements
On the other hand
If we would form a Judgement of the manner
in which Lawyers have proceeded in
marshalling the articles of their Science? [are
need [/let in] but] concieve of the medical Systematic
as having interspersed in their divisions of


[bottom left page]
<note>hung</note> <p>brooded over the latter, as over the former<lb/>
Science to check the flight of Genius.</p>


diseases such as were treated by ????
<p><add>No Bugbear</add> Nothing either from without, or from within<lb/>
excluding?, such as were treated by Opinion,
has stood <add>hover'd</add> before the one as before the other<lb/>
such as were treated by Antimony, &
to <add><gap/>ify from the assuming/ption</add> to prevent the assumption of first principles <add>[+]</add><lb/>
such as were treated by the Bark * [*???]
<note><add>[+]</add> wheresoever Judgement <lb/>
[x/I open a celebrated Book of Institutes,
<add>should]\</add> directed from out of <lb/>
& I there read that '???? is an
the <add>whole expansion</add><del>boundless  expence</del><lb/>
offence' ... [x/It might as well have
<add>of the subject</add> <del>of Intellect</del></note> with the most unlimited freedom, or<lb/>
been said] [replaced by 1: It were as proper to say (did not usage in some sort authorities the p/providing en infision) that Opinion is a disease.
the <add>pursual of</add> pursuing them through their utmost consequences.</p>
It were even more so, since the [/conformity] [x/application]
of the same remedy to diseases of different
denominations might seem + [+: at least till the inference were waekened by a more particular [expression of their natures] detect their causes of their symptoms] to [/indicate] infer
some [/degree] sort of analogy between the diseases
themselves - But what Analogy is there
[/for example] between the Offence of bringing the Popish
transferries into their healer?, + [+: 13 Comm. c. 2.] & that of [/acting] condoning?
forcibly transporting [/men & women] [subjects] out of it? || [||: 31. Car. 2. c. 2.]


[bottom right page]
<note><del>As is to use a distinction<lb/>
<gap/> to <gap/><lb/>
<gap/> for <gap/><lb/>
not <gap/></del> <lb/>
<del>which I think I<lb/>
have met with somewhere<lb/>
in L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Bacon<lb/>
&amp; <gap/> in classifiable<lb/>
have proceeded as  <gap/></del> </note><lb/><lb/>


+ [+: 4 Comm. 102]
<p><add>Accordingly on the well trodden field of the Science</add> The Tactic powers <add>of the <gap/></add> have bestowed themselves <lb/>
vigorously on all sides; &amp; if many things <lb/>
<note><del>Physician<lb/>
would have done, if<lb/>
interspersed in their<lb/>
they had divided d<gap/><lb/>
divisions of <gap/><lb/>
into <gap/> as were<lb/>
treated by Bleeding,<lb/>
<gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
treated by Antimony<lb/>
such as were treated<lb/>
<gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del></note> yet remain <add>obscure</add> ill-defined, ill <add>arranged</add> methodised<lb/>
it may be deemed, to use a distinction <lb/>
of L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Bacon's like imperfection not<lb/>
hominis. but artis <add>from then a defect in the number <lb/>or distinctness in the <unclear>phenomena</unclear>, <lb/>not either of labour/industry or
ingenuity in their arrangements</add> <lb/>
<add>On the other hand</add> <del>If we</del> would <add>ever</add> form a Judgement of the manner<lb/>
in which Lawyers have proceeded in <lb/>
marshalling the articles of their Science? [are<lb/>
need <add>let us</add] but] </add>conceive of the medical Systematic<lb/>
as having interspersed in their Divisions of </p><pb/>
 
<p>diseases such as were treated by <del>with Antimony</del><add>by Opium</add>
<note> Hay with Fever</note> Bleeding, such as were treated by Opium,<lb/>
such as were treated by Antimony, &amp;<lb/>
such as were treated by the Bark<lb/>
<add>[+]</add><del>I open a celebrated Book of <unclear>Institutes</unclear>, <lb/>
&amp; I there read that 'Premunire is an</del> <lb/>
offence' ... <del>It might as well have</del><lb/>
<note>1<lb/>
It were as proper to<lb/>
say (did not usage<lb/>
in some sort authorize<lb/>
the <add>preceding</add> expression)</note> <del>been said</del><add>1</add>] that Opium is a disease.<lb/>
It were even more so, since the <add>congruity</add><del>application</del><lb/>
<note>The multiplicity<lb/>
variety of Activity<lb/>
of that <gap/>inar was<lb/>
such as laid them<lb/>
under a happy<lb/>
necessity of</note> of the same remedy to diseases of different<lb/>
<note>[+] at least till the<lb/>
Reference were weakened<lb/>
by a more <lb/>particular [exposition<lb/>
of their natures]; detect<lb/>
their causes &amp; their symptoms</note> denominations might seem <add>[+]</add> to infer <add>indicate</add><lb/>
some <add>degree</add> sort of analogy between the diseases<lb/>
themselves &#x2014; But what Analogy is there <lb/>
<add>for example</add> between the Offence of bringing the Popish<lb/>
trumperies into the Realm, + <add><del>no Eliz. c. 2</del>.</add>] &amp; that of <add>acting</add> <del>ending</del><lb/>
Having <add>the part of procurer in <gap/> <gap/> contract</add>
forcibly transporting <add>men &amp; women</add> [subjects] out of it? ] || [||<hi rend="superscript">a</hi></p>
 
<p>+ 13 Eliz. c. 2. ||31. Car.2.c.2.</p>
<note><unclear>CLASSIFICAT.</unclear> Law X Physic <gap/></note>
<pb/>
 
<p><add>[+]</add>I open <del>a</del><add><del>the most</del></add> celebrated Book of Institutes, &amp; at the <lb/>
8<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Chapter of the 4<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Book &amp; <add>at the opening</add>] <del>the past sentence</del><lb/>
<add>of</add> that chapter <add>[+]</add> [<del>I find this Sentence</del><lb/>
 
<note><add>+</add>4 Comm. 102</note> | A third <add>in a note</add> <hi rend="underline">species of offence</hi> more immediately<lb/>
<note>[+]<add>+</add> I read, that<lb/>
Premunire is <hi rend="underline">an</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">offence</hi>.</note> | affecting the King &amp; his government, <lb/>
| thought not subject to capital Punishment<lb/>
| is that of Premunire] or<hi rend="superscript">+</hi>. . ] . . .</p>
 
<p>IIII The same Author a f ew pages after <add>++</add> with<lb/>
<note>16.<hi rend="superscript">++</hi>115</note> his usual elegance, &amp; not without energy<lb/>
proceedeth in this strain. "Thus for the<lb/>
penalties of Pr&aelig;munire seem to have kept<lb/>
within the proper hands of their original <lb/>
institution, the depressing of the power<lb/>
<note>A Note<lb/>
The 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> of these may<lb/>
indeed be said to affect<lb/>
more immediately the<lb/>
King &amp; his Government<lb/>
but what is there in<lb/>
the latter whereby it<lb/>
may be said to do so<lb/>
more than in Murder<add>Battery</add><lb/>
in theft &amp; in Extortion</note> of the Pope: but they being pains of no<lb/>
inconsiderable consequence, it has been <lb/>
thought fit to apply the same to other<lb/>
heinous offences; some of which bear more <lb/>
&amp; some less relation to their original offence</p>
 
<note>[BR}{1}[ ]</note><lb/><pb/>


I open a celebrated Book of Institutes, & at the
8th Chapter of the .... Book & [/at the opening] [x/the ????]
[/of] that chapter [x/ I find this Sentence.
A third [/in a note] [u/species of offence] more immediately
affecting the thing & his government,
thought not subject to capital Punishment
is that of Premenive]


The same Author a f ew pages after * [*: 16.115] with
his usual elegance, & not without energy
precedent in this strain. "Thus for the
penalties of Premunive same to have hand
written the proper Sounds of their original
institution, the deprofing of the power
of the Pope: but they being pains of no
inconsiderable consequence, it has been
thought fit to apply the same to other
heinour offences; some of which bear more
& some less relation to their original offence
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:49, 15 June 2020

Click Here To Edit


CLASSIFICATION. Law X Physic

Dis Sauvages in his
Nosologia, Damin
in his Elements of
Therapeutics Macbride
— Linnæus Q.

When so much ingenuity has been by industriousexpended in
giving a systematical arrangement to the diseases
of the Body Natural,
why may not the same course be taken to
advantage, with Crimes?, the with Crimes which, with
reference to the objects, may be termed according
to the common Metaphor, the diseases
of the Body Politic, or, with reference to
the agents actors, the diseases of the mind?
And why has it not been taken?[+] & how
[+] is a question that
may be ready to
recur to many
] is it that in this & in so many other
respects the Science Art of Legislation should have
stood been so much less indebted to its Professors
than the art of Healing?

It is because neither the Spirit of Civil Tyranny,
nor the Spirit of Dogmatic Theology which
which poisons every thing it touches, have
not ether separately or in alliance


---page break---

hung

brooded over the latter, as over the former
Science to check the flight of Genius.

No Bugbear Nothing either from without, or from within
has stood hover'd before the one as before the other
to ify from the assuming/ption to prevent the assumption of first principles [+]
[+] wheresoever Judgement
should]\ directed from out of
the whole expansionboundless expence
of the subject of Intellect
with the most unlimited freedom, or
the pursual of pursuing them through their utmost consequences.

As is to use a distinction
to
for
not

which I think I
have met with somewhere
in Ld Bacon
& in classifiable
have proceeded as


Accordingly on the well trodden field of the Science The Tactic powers of the have bestowed themselves
vigorously on all sides; & if many things
Physician
would have done, if
interspersed in their
they had divided d
divisions of
into as were
treated by Bleeding,

treated by Antimony
such as were treated
yet remain obscure ill-defined, ill arranged methodised
it may be deemed, to use a distinction
of Ld Bacon's like imperfection not
hominis. but artis from then a defect in the number
or distinctness in the phenomena,
not either of labour/industry or ingenuity in their arrangements

On the other hand If we would ever form a Judgement of the manner
in which Lawyers have proceeded in
marshalling the articles of their Science? [are
need let us</add] but] conceive of the medical Systematic
as having interspersed in their Divisions of


---page break---

diseases such as were treated by with Antimonyby Opium Hay with Fever Bleeding, such as were treated by Opium,
such as were treated by Antimony, &
such as were treated by the Bark
[+]I open a celebrated Book of Institutes,
& I there read that 'Premunire is an

offence' ... It might as well have
1
It were as proper to
say (did not usage
in some sort authorize
the preceding expression)
been said1] that Opium is a disease.
It were even more so, since the congruityapplication
The multiplicity
variety of Activity
of that inar was
such as laid them
under a happy
necessity of
of the same remedy to diseases of different
[+] at least till the
Reference were weakened
by a more
particular [exposition
of their natures]; detect
their causes & their symptoms
denominations might seem [+] to infer indicate
some degree sort of analogy between the diseases
themselves — But what Analogy is there
for example between the Offence of bringing the Popish
trumperies into the Realm, + no Eliz. c. 2.] & that of acting ending
Having the part of procurer in contract forcibly transporting men & women [subjects] out of it? ] || [||a

+ 13 Eliz. c. 2. ||31. Car.2.c.2.

CLASSIFICAT. Law X Physic
---page break---

[+]I open athe most celebrated Book of Institutes, & at the
8th Chapter of the 4th Book & at the opening] the past sentence
of that chapter [+] [I find this Sentence
+4 Comm. 102 | A third in a note species of offence more immediately
[+]+ I read, that
Premunire is an
offence.
| affecting the King & his government,
| thought not subject to capital Punishment
| is that of Premunire] or+. . ] . . .

IIII The same Author a f ew pages after ++ with
16.++115 his usual elegance, & not without energy
proceedeth in this strain. "Thus for the
penalties of Præmunire seem to have kept
within the proper hands of their original
institution, the depressing of the power
A Note
The 1st of these may
indeed be said to affect
more immediately the
King & his Government
but what is there in
the latter whereby it
may be said to do so
more than in MurderBattery
in theft & in Extortion
of the Pope: but they being pains of no
inconsiderable consequence, it has been
thought fit to apply the same to other
heinous offences; some of which bear more
& some less relation to their original offence

[BR}{1}[ ]

---page break---



Identifier: | JB/063/068/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 63.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

063

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

068

Info in main headings field

classification law & physic

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

[[page_numbering::c1 / f2 / c3 / [f4]]]

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

20257

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in