JB/135/078/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/135/078/002: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


Geometry 1. Geometrical propositions over all relative to bodies 2 Are none of these strictly true 3 Under what <gap/>atations they may without any prejudicial error be considered as true  4. They ought all of them to be <unclear>conchid</unclear> in general term: and that throughout.  5 How the terms employed in geometrical propositions may be general 6. Terms general in themselves - as triangle, parallelogram 7 - 2. General by relation in reference: where the name of one object is taken by from the relation it bears to other objects.
<head><!-- Pencil heading -->Geometry</head>
<p>1. Geometrical propositions <lb/>
are all relative <lb/>
to bodies</p>
<p>2 Are none of these <lb/>
strictly true</p>
<p>3 Under what limitations <lb/>
they may without <lb/>
any prejudicial <lb/>
<add>error</add> be considered <lb/>
as true</p>  
<p>4. They ought all <lb/>
of them to be considered<lb/>
in general terms: <lb/>
and that throughout.</p>  
<p>5 How the terms<lb/>
employed in geometrical <lb/>
propositions <lb/>
may be made<lb/>
general</p>
<p>6. Terms general <lb/>
in themselves&#x2014;as <lb/>
triangle, parallelogram</p>
<p>7&#x2014;2. General by <lb/>
relation in reference:<lb/>
where the name of<lb/>
one object is taken<lb/>
by <add>from</add> the relation it <lb/>
bears to other objects.</p>
<pb/>
<p>Mathematical <del>has</del><lb/>
science. The branch <lb/>
of science termed Mathematical <lb/>
has two <lb/>
main divisions, Geometry<lb/>
and Arithmetic.</p>
<p>Geometrical propositions <lb/>
are general <lb/>
propositions having <lb/>
for their subject <lb/>
either body (that is <lb/>
bodies in general) or <lb/>
space considered <lb/>
as unoccupied by <lb/>
body: both body <lb/>
and space being <lb/>
considered with reference <lb/>
to their form <lb/>
or configuration <lb/>
solely without regard <add>reference</add> <lb/>
to any other <lb/>
properties they may <lb/>
respectively possess: <lb/>
<del>Geometrical for</del> <lb/>
The proportions <lb/>
termed geometrical <lb/>
the proportions delivered <lb/>
in books <lb/>
termed books of <lb/>
geometry are in <lb/>
the first place all <lb/>
of them relative to <lb/>
figure <del>which is</del> <lb/>
that is all of those <lb/>
relative either to <lb/>
body to a property <lb/>
of body and thus <lb/>
all of them relative <lb/>
to body, <add>[+]</add> They are <lb/>
therefore no farther <add>true</add></p>
<note><add>[+]</add> Space thus out of<lb/>
the question.</note>
<pb/>
<p>than in as far as <lb/>
they are true of body, <lb/>
that is of bodies <lb/>
in general.  <lb/>
But of bodies in <lb/>
general a geometrical <lb/>
proposition <lb/>
can no further be <lb/>
true than in as <lb/>
far as it is true <lb/>
of every body whatsoever <lb/>
possessed of <lb/>
the figure to which <lb/>
that proposition relates <lb/>
the existence <lb/>
of which is supposed <lb/>
by the proposition.</p> <pb/>


<p>2. As <del>Geometry</del><lb/>
<del>is the</del> propositions <lb/>
about which Geometry <lb/>
is conversant <lb/>
are without exception <lb/>
general <lb/>
<del>names</del> propositions <lb/>
they ought without <lb/>
exception to be <sic>conveyd</sic> <lb/>
by expressed <lb/>
in and convey'd <lb/>
by general terms <lb/>
the terms employ'd <lb/>
for the expression <lb/>
of them ought without <lb/>
any exception <lb/>
to be general terms <lb/>
of a nature equally <lb/>
general.</p>


<p>If in any instance <lb/>
the expression <lb/>
made use of <lb/>
in any such occasion <lb/>
fails of being <lb/>
a general one, it <lb/>
is <hi rend="underline">pro tanto</hi> inadequate <lb/>
to its object: <lb/>
the idea it <lb/>
excites of itself is <lb/>
not a general one: <lb/>
of itself therefore <lb/>
it fails of exciting <lb/>
the idea it is intended <lb/>
to excite: <lb/>
if that idea chances <lb/>
notwithstanding <lb/>
to present itself <lb/>
to the reader, <lb/>
<del>it is owing to</del> it <lb/>
is an idea of his <lb/>
<add>own</add> formation, it is not <lb/>
the idea presented <lb/>
to him by the author.</p><pb/>
<p>That the <lb/>
reader obtains<lb/>
the instruction <lb/>
meant to be convey'd <lb/>
is owing <lb/>
to his own sagacity <lb/>
not to the <lb/>
talent and skill <lb/>
of the author. The <lb/>
idea presented by <lb/>
the author is <lb/>
inadequate and<lb/>
ill suited <add>unadapted</add> to the <lb/>
purpose: and before <lb/>
the purpose <lb/>
can have been <lb/>
answered that idea <lb/>
must have been <lb/>
changed: it must <lb/>
have been set <lb/>
aside, and an <lb/>
idea the idea which <lb/>
is adequate to the <lb/>
purpose must <lb/>
<del>have</del> by the sagacity <lb/>
of the <lb/>
reader have been <lb/>
substituted in the <lb/>
room of it. So <lb/>
long as the reader <lb/>
has <del>an</del> in his <lb/>
mind no other <lb/>
ideas than what <lb/>
the <del>writer has</del> <lb/>
words of the writer <lb/>
present to it, so <lb/>
long he fails of <lb/>
understanding the <lb/>
writer, so long the <lb/>
writer fails of <lb/>
having made himself <lb/>
understood: of <lb/>
ever<lb/></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:35, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Geometry

1. Geometrical propositions
are all relative
to bodies

2 Are none of these
strictly true

3 Under what limitations
they may without
any prejudicial
error be considered
as true

4. They ought all
of them to be considered
in general terms:
and that throughout.

5 How the terms
employed in geometrical
propositions
may be made
general

6. Terms general
in themselves—as
triangle, parallelogram

7—2. General by
relation in reference:
where the name of
one object is taken
by from the relation it
bears to other objects.


---page break---

Mathematical has
science. The branch
of science termed Mathematical
has two
main divisions, Geometry
and Arithmetic.

Geometrical propositions
are general
propositions having
for their subject
either body (that is
bodies in general) or
space considered
as unoccupied by
body: both body
and space being
considered with reference
to their form
or configuration
solely without regard reference
to any other
properties they may
respectively possess:
Geometrical for
The proportions
termed geometrical
the proportions delivered
in books
termed books of
geometry are in
the first place all
of them relative to
figure which is
that is all of those
relative either to
body to a property
of body and thus
all of them relative
to body, [+] They are
therefore no farther true

[+] Space thus out of
the question.

---page break---

than in as far as
they are true of body,
that is of bodies
in general.
But of bodies in
general a geometrical
proposition
can no further be
true than in as
far as it is true
of every body whatsoever
possessed of
the figure to which
that proposition relates
the existence
of which is supposed
by the proposition.


---page break---

2. As Geometry
is the propositions
about which Geometry
is conversant
are without exception
general
names propositions
they ought without
exception to be conveyd
by expressed
in and convey'd
by general terms
the terms employ'd
for the expression
of them ought without
any exception
to be general terms
of a nature equally
general.

If in any instance
the expression
made use of
in any such occasion
fails of being
a general one, it
is pro tanto inadequate
to its object:
the idea it
excites of itself is
not a general one:
of itself therefore
it fails of exciting
the idea it is intended
to excite:
if that idea chances
notwithstanding
to present itself
to the reader,
it is owing to it
is an idea of his
own formation, it is not
the idea presented
to him by the author.


---page break---

That the
reader obtains
the instruction
meant to be convey'd
is owing
to his own sagacity
not to the
talent and skill
of the author. The
idea presented by
the author is
inadequate and
ill suited unadapted to the
purpose: and before
the purpose
can have been
answered that idea
must have been
changed: it must
have been set
aside, and an
idea the idea which
is adequate to the
purpose must
have by the sagacity
of the
reader have been
substituted in the
room of it. So
long as the reader
has an in his
mind no other
ideas than what
the writer has
words of the writer
present to it, so
long he fails of
understanding the
writer, so long the
writer fails of
having made himself
understood: of
ever



Identifier: | JB/135/078/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

135

Main Headings

Folio number

078

Info in main headings field

geometry

Image

002

Titles

Category

rudiments sheet (brouillon)

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46196

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in