JB/050/075/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/075/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


under construction ...




<head>CERTAINTY.  LAW X FACT.  Barrington.</head>
<head>CERTAINTY.  LAW X FACT.  Barrington.</head>
<p>Mr barrington in his Observation on the <gap/> <gap/> <gap/>
<p>Mr barrington in his Observation <note>Obs. p.120.</note> on the Stat. <unclear>Wists</unclear> <unclear>2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi></unclear> <unclear>e <del>2</del>30</unclear>
<lb/>
<lb/>
takes occasion to observe <del>from thence that a Jury</del> <add>that on the Authority of that Statute</add> <hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> it is
takes occasion to observe <del>from thence that a Jury</del> <add>that on the Authority of that Statute</add> <hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> - which "says he, "is <unclear>unrepented</unclear>" </note> it is
<lb/>
<lb/>
clear that a Jury may find what verdict they please - but
clear that a Jury may find what verdict they please - but
<lb/>
<lb/>
this is to be understood only <unclear>of</unclear> <sic>disscusins</sic> : for it is only <sic>disscusins</sic>
this is to be understood only discussions of discussions: for it is only discussions
<lb/>
<lb/>
that are mentioned: that is of a species of <gap/> <add>Action</add>  
that are mentioned: that is of a species of <gap/> <add>Action</add>  
Line 23: Line 21:


<head>CERTAINTY LAW X FACT.</head>
<head>CERTAINTY LAW X FACT.</head>
<p>Till then the controversy must remain <gap/>.
<p><note>x xx</note> Till then the controversy must remain <unclear><sic>unterminable</sic></unclear><!--  mis-spelling of 'interminable', meaning endless -->.
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>
<p>No boundary Line can be drawn between the Provinces of the
<p>No boundary Line can be drawn between the Provinces of the
<lb/>
<lb/>
Judge &amp; Jury  
Judge &amp; Jury  
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>
<p>The Law &amp; the Fact must remain inextricably entangled in
<p>The Law &amp; the Fact must remain inextricably entangled in
<lb/>
<lb/>
each other
each other
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>
<p>The mind vibrating between opposite prejudices
<p>The mind vibrating between opposite prejudices
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>
<p>A perpetual source of confusion contradiction suspicion <gap/> &amp; error
<p>A perpetual source of confusion contradiction suspicion <gap/> &amp; error
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>
<p>That <sic>Chymistry</sic> which shall find out an expedient to
<p>That <sic>Chymistry</sic> which shall find out an expedient to
<lb/>
<lb/>
overcome this obstinate adhesion , &amp; present the two questions <add>points</add> disengaged
overcome this obstinate adhesion, &amp; present the two questions <add>points</add> disengaged
<lb/>
<lb/>
&amp; <gap/> from each other , will be allowed to have operated
&amp; <unclear>purified</unclear> from each other, will be allowed to have operated
<lb/>
<lb/>
no <add>a not</add> unimportant <add>a</add> precipitation
no <add>a not</add> unimportant <add>a</add> precipitation
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>
<p>They speak of them as <hi rend='underline'>actually</hi> complicated &amp; they
<p>They speak of them as <hi rend='underline'>actually</hi> complicated &amp; they
<lb/>
<lb/>
Line 53: Line 57:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:54, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


CERTAINTY. LAW X FACT. Barrington.

Mr barrington in his Observation Obs. p.120. on the Stat. Wists 2d e 230
takes occasion to observe from thence that a Jury that on the Authority of that Statute [+] [+] - which "says he, "is unrepented" it is
clear that a Jury may find what verdict they please - but
this is to be understood only discussions of discussions: for it is only discussions
that are mentioned: that is of a species of Action
which now is never brought.


---page break---

CERTAINTY LAW X FACT.

x xx Till then the controversy must remain unterminable.

No boundary Line can be drawn between the Provinces of the
Judge & Jury

The Law & the Fact must remain inextricably entangled in
each other

The mind vibrating between opposite prejudices

A perpetual source of confusion contradiction suspicion & error

That Chymistry which shall find out an expedient to
overcome this obstinate adhesion, & present the two questions points disengaged
& purified from each other, will be allowed to have operated
no a not unimportant a precipitation

They speak of them as actually complicated & they
seem reconciled by Custom to the considering them as essentially so




Identifier: | JB/050/075/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

075

Info in main headings field

certainty. law & fact barrington

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16066

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in