JB/011/062/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/011/062/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p> 1829 <del>Jul</del> Aug. 3 </p> <head> Reformists reviewed</head> <p><!-- note in pencil --> <note><Beginning</note></p> <p> <note> J.B. Ends of Justice<lb/> &amp; Judicature</note></p> <p> <!-- number in pencil --><note>31</note><lb/> Collateral end<lb/> of Justice minimization<lb/> of delay vexation and<lb/> <sic>expence of judicature<lb/> maximisation of <sic> d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic></note </p> <p> So much for the main end or ends of judicature:  many<lb/> always regular English repute judicature.  Now for <add>as to</add> the collateral <lb/> end or ends.  For these a most stricter account will suffice.<lb/> Collateral end of justice, <gap/> (as Bullen <del>calls</del> <add> phrases</add> it)<lb/> of the evil of the evil unavoidably inherent any judicial procedure:<lb/> <del><gap/></del> <gap/> breeches of <gap/> evil <del>delay</del><lb/> <sic>expence,</sic> delay and vexation, correspondent ends of justice<lb/> minimization of <sic>expence,</sic> minimization of delay, minimization<lb/> of vexation:  correspondent <gap/> ends of judicature, maximisation<lb/> of the <sic>expence</sic> of what the <gap/> may <add>greatly</add> cut of the delay<lb/> are productive, and the encouragement  thereby give as above to dishonest defences: maximization of vexation <gap/> when<lb/> not directly productive of fees maximization of it for the<lb/> <del>encouragement</del> <add> encouragement given to <gap/>, and those the <gap/> to be the <gap/> by</add> pleasure of vagueness <gap/> the <del><gap/></del> of<lb/>each of two advances afford to the other.</p> <p> <!-- number in pencil --><note> 32<lb/> For the whole of<lb/> this expose the country<lb/> indebted to J.B.</note></p> <p. So much for the sake of justice, so much for<lb/> the opposite, the actual ends of English regular <add> the regular breech of English</add> judicature.<lb/> So much for the discourse what the <gap/> of the existing<lb/> Judges <del>so</del> with such <gap/> and <gap/> <gap/><lb/> ever led to plead in the body of the law: and which the <gap/><lb/> excesses of those same predecessors has with correspondent no<lb/> <gap/> <del>and <gap/> <gap/> success</del> have at all times <gap/> above<lb/> all at the present time &#x2014; so successfully kept up.  we say<lb/> above all the present: for when the time comes we shall have<lb/> to <sic>shew</sic> that <add> him</add> in the race of depravity, those at present is <gap/><lb/> with the <gap/. that has been <gap/> <gap/> l<gap/> <gap/><lb/> quarter, been left <del> all then</del> the </del> <gap/> <gap/></del> <add> favoured<add>fullest and <gap/></add> of their predecessors<lb/> for <gap/>.</p> <p>For the whole of this <hi rend="underline">expose</hi> <add> expedition</add> in the country <gap/> to<lb/> Jeremy Bentham this is the observation: <sic>tis</sic> the very language: <add> without the <gap/> of</add> for his<lb/> language<gap/> could not <del>have</del> be commended: scarcely could the <gap/> have been<lb/> <gap/></p>  
<p> 1829 <del>Jul</del> Aug. 3 </p> <head> Reformists reviewed</head> <p><!-- note in pencil --> <note>Beginning</note></p> <p> <note> J.B. Ends of Justice<lb/> &amp; Judicature</note></p> <p> <!-- number in pencil --><note>31<lb/> Collateral end<lb/> of Justice minimization<lb/> of delay vexation and<lb/> <sic>expence</sic> of judicature<lb/> maximisation of <sic> d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic></note> </p> <p> So much for the main end or ends of judicature:  meaning<lb/> always regular English repute judicature.  Now for <add>as to</add> the collateral <lb/> end or ends.  For these a most stricter account will suffice.<lb/> Collateral end of justice, minimization (as Bullen <del>calls</del> <add> phrases</add> it)<lb/> of the evil of the evil unavoidably inherent any judicial procedure:<lb/> <del><gap/></del> <gap/> breeches of that evil <del>delay</del><lb/> <sic>expence,</sic> delay and vexation, correspondent ends of justice<lb/> minimization of <sic>expence,</sic> minimization of delay, minimization<lb/> of vexation:  correspondent <gap/> ends of judicature, maximisation<lb/> of the <sic>expence</sic> for the sake of that profit which runs <add>rises</add><lb/> in proportion to the <sic>expence</sic>:  maximization of delay for the sake<lb/> of the <sic>expense</sic> of which the <gap/> may <add>greatly</add> cut of the delay<lb/> are productive, and the encouragement  thereby given as above<lb/> to dishonest defences: maximization of vexation <gap/> when<lb/> not directly productive of fees maximization of it for the<lb/> <del>encouragement</del> <add> encouragement given to litigation, and those the increase to be the <unclear>business</unclear> by</add> pleasure of vagueness which the vexation of<lb/>each of two advances afford to the other.</p> <p> <!-- number in pencil --><note> 32<lb/> For the whole of<lb/> this exposé the country<lb/> indebted to J.B.</note></p> <p> So much for the sale of justice, so much for<lb/> the opposite, the actual ends of English regular <add> the regular breech of English</add> judicature.<lb/> So much for the discourse which the predecessors of the existing<lb/> Judges <del>so</del> with such ingenuity and indefatigable industry<lb/> were led to plant in the body of the law: and which the same<lb/> excesses of those same predecessors has with correspondent industry<lb/> <del>and <gap/> <gap/> success</del> have at all times and above<lb/> all at the present time &#x2014; so successfully kept up.  We say<lb/> above all the present: for when the time comes we shall have<lb/> to <sic>shew</sic> that <add> him</add> in the race of depravity, those at present in existence,<lb/> with the <gap/> that has been <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/> quarter, been left <del> all then</del> the </del> <gap/> <gap/></del> <add> favoured<add>fullest and <gap/></add> of their predecessors<lb/> far behind.</p> <p>For the whole of this <hi rend="underline">exposé</hi> <add> expedition</add> in the country <gap/> to<lb/> Jeremy Bentham this is the observation: his the very language: <add> without the benefit of</add> for his<lb/> language <gap/> could not <del>have</del> be commended: scarcely could the <gap/> have been<lb/> <gap/></p>  




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:33, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1829 Jul Aug. 3

Reformists reviewed

Beginning

J.B. Ends of Justice
& Judicature

31
Collateral end
of Justice minimization
of delay vexation and
expence of judicature
maximisation of do

So much for the main end or ends of judicature: meaning
always regular English repute judicature. Now for as to the collateral
end or ends. For these a most stricter account will suffice.
Collateral end of justice, minimization (as Bullen calls phrases it)
of the evil of the evil unavoidably inherent any judicial procedure:
breeches of that evil delay
expence, delay and vexation, correspondent ends of justice
minimization of expence, minimization of delay, minimization
of vexation: correspondent ends of judicature, maximisation
of the expence for the sake of that profit which runs rises
in proportion to the expence: maximization of delay for the sake
of the expense of which the may greatly cut of the delay
are productive, and the encouragement thereby given as above
to dishonest defences: maximization of vexation when
not directly productive of fees maximization of it for the
encouragement encouragement given to litigation, and those the increase to be the business by pleasure of vagueness which the vexation of
each of two advances afford to the other.

32
For the whole of
this exposé the country
indebted to J.B.

So much for the sale of justice, so much for
the opposite, the actual ends of English regular the regular breech of English judicature.
So much for the discourse which the predecessors of the existing
Judges so with such ingenuity and indefatigable industry
were led to plant in the body of the law: and which the same
excesses of those same predecessors has with correspondent industry
and success have at all times and above
all at the present time — so successfully kept up. We say
above all the present: for when the time comes we shall have
to shew that him in the race of depravity, those at present in existence,
with the that has been
quarter, been left all then the favoured<add>fullest and of their predecessors
far behind.

For the whole of this exposé expedition in the country to
Jeremy Bentham this is the observation: his the very language: without the benefit of for his
language could not have be commended: scarcely could the have been



Identifier: | JB/011/062/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1829-08-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

31-32

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

062

Info in main headings field

reformists reviewed

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e12

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

3759

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in