★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary  | 
				No edit summary  | 
				||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->  | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->  | ||
<head>MAINTEN: & CHAMPERTY</head> <p><note> Either the Title is good, or it is<lb/> a bad one or doubtful<lb/> If good it is hard that a man<lb/> may at   | <head>MAINTEN: & CHAMPERTY</head> <p><note> Either the Title is good, or it is<lb/> a bad one or doubtful<lb/> If good it is hard that a man<lb/> may at sell what he has a right to<lb/> If bad, he will not meet with a<lb/> purchaser — or if he does, it is<lb/> the purchaser's own folly: when<lb/> there is <sic>advised</sic> enough to be had<lb/> if he will take it.</note></p> <p> <note>If doubtful, why should not one man<lb/> who is willing, deter the chaser, as<lb/> well as another?</note></p> <p>At present, one man has just as good <add>as</add> and not a whit better chance than another,<lb/> If a man brings  <add> forfends or pursues</add> a Title that is good for nothing, he will have his <sic>labor</sic> for his pains, & the<lb/>privilege of paying the costs into the bargain —</p> <p> If he is willing to pay costs and only wants to plague <add>by litigation</add> one who he has a pique to: <add> that</add><lb/> he may do if he pleases, without being beholden to <add> <unclear>asking</unclear> the leave of</add> any body </p> <p>If either buyer or seller make a bad bargain, it is not more than what they are liable<lb/> to with a Horse or a House or a Ship or an Annuity or any thing else</p> <p> If all that is <add>not</add> enough <hi rend="superscript">2</hi>argument  <hi rend="superscript">1</hi> for the abolition <add>of the restraint</add>, this may be <add> more</add> powerful with some —<lb/> done every day, under Sanction of Courts of Justice: & no inconvenience doth arise. #<lb/> <note>This is done by the Assignees of<lb/> Bankrupts — the method taken <lb/> to <sic>effecticate</sic> the bargain is, for<lb/> <del>your</del> <add> the Assignees</add> to the sellers to <del> go at</del> <add> execute</add><lb/> a Letter of Attorney to the<lb/> Buyer to sue in their name.</note><lb/> Now if a Title to Money may be bought, a Title to Land or any thing else may be bought <add> too:</add><lb/> If not I should be glad to know the difference.</p> <!-- line across the page --> <p> In a Note.</p> <p> I had once occasion to see an instance of the mischief produced by these <unclear>shots</unclear> — A<lb/> Gentleman in his youth had been <del>induced</del> <add> inveigled</add> by a server of Fraud & imposters, to <gap/><lb/> in the conveyance of an <add> a very considerable</add> Estate — <add> at a great undervalue</add> after some interval he instituted a suit and<lb/> Equity to recover it back again — He was driven to <add> being driven to</add> great straights — he entered <add>into</add><lb/> a Treaty with some persons for the selling them a share in it: when it was nearly<lb/> concluded the Counsel of one of them advised him it was not safe — It therefore<lb/> broke off: and <add> the consequence was</add> the unhappy man <add> being in urgent want of money</add> with <del>the</del> the strongest assurances of success from his<lb/> Counsel, was <del>obliged</del> <add> glad</add> to <del>accept</del> <add> compound</add> with the <sic>Deft</sic> for about 1/4 of <del>what</del> the value of <del><gap/></del> <add> what</add> <lb/> would have been his share on the partition.</p> <!-- line across the page --> <p> The Laws against Maintenance and Champerty are curious evidences <add> documents</add> and the <unclear>moral</unclear> History<lb/> One cannot look for more authentic or more conclusive evidence to prove <add> of the character</add> at once <add> as well of</add> the imperfection<lb/> of the Law as <add> and</add> <del> and the lawless and violent/<gap/> spirit</del> of the People.   So violent and lawless were the<lb/> <add> <gap/></add> people, that if a number of these agreed in any thing, <del>it was</del> <add> the</add> probability was in favour of their<lb/> doing mischief.  So ill-contrived and liable to abuse <add>rough & liable to be out of order</add>, was the Law <add>mechanism</add> that if two or three attempted<lb/> to set it at work together with the view of doing <add>producing</add> mischief, it was probable they would succeed.<lb/> Men had as much, or thought they had as much to apprehend from its exertion as from the <unclear>event</unclear><lb/> of it.   In <del>some <gap/></del> <add> pursuance</add> of these strange notions which seemed to have been but too justly warranted,<lb/> the spirit of union among the people was to be broken — and all sympathisers prosecuted.<lb/> A man has a suit at Law.   Another man supplies him with money to carry it on?  It is as<lb/> that justice might be done?   was it to save <add>rescue</add> poverty from oppression?  Impossible, says the Law.<lb/> <note> Of all the possible motives,<lb/> the probable are but two</note><lb/> <del>then</del> It would be but one out of 2 motives — <del>to <gap/></del>  The <del>Deft with the <gap/></del> <add> thing in dispute had</add> <unclear>exerted</unclear> the <gap/><lb/> of the Lender, or the <sic>Deft</sic> was his enemy.   The Deft <add>The man in the</add> was to be made the <add>an</add> the instrument either of his Avarice<lb/> or his revenge.</p> <p> <note>The <sic>Deft </sic> was to be harassed <lb/> by threats or by <sic>expence</sic><lb/> into a submission</note></p> <p> MAINTEN: & Champerty. [BR][1]</p>    | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->  | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->  | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}  | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}  | ||
MAINTEN: & CHAMPERTY
 Either the Title is good, or it is
 a bad one or doubtful
 If good it is hard that a man
 may at sell what he has a right to
 If bad, he will not meet with a
 purchaser — or if he does, it is
 the purchaser's own folly: when
 there is advised enough to be had
 if he will take it.
 If doubtful, why should not one man
 who is willing, deter the chaser, as
 well as another?
At present, one man has just as good as and not a whit better chance than another,
 If a man brings   forfends or pursues a Title that is good for nothing, he will have his labor for his pains, & the
privilege of paying the costs into the bargain —
 If he is willing to pay costs and only wants to plague by litigation one who he has a pique to:  that
 he may do if he pleases, without being beholden to  asking the leave of any body 
If either buyer or seller make a bad bargain, it is not more than what they are liable
 to with a Horse or a House or a Ship or an Annuity or any thing else
 If all that is not enough 2argument  1 for the abolition of the restraint, this may be  more powerful with some —
 done every day, under Sanction of Courts of Justice: & no inconvenience doth arise. #
 This is done by the Assignees of
 Bankrupts — the method taken 
 to effecticate the bargain is, for
 your  the Assignees to the sellers to  go at  execute
 a Letter of Attorney to the
 Buyer to sue in their name.
 Now if a Title to Money may be bought, a Title to Land or any thing else may be bought  too:
 If not I should be glad to know the difference.
In a Note.
 I had once occasion to see an instance of the mischief produced by these shots — A
 Gentleman in his youth had been induced  inveigled by a server of Fraud & imposters, to 
 in the conveyance of an  a very considerable Estate —  at a great undervalue after some interval he instituted a suit and
 Equity to recover it back again — He was driven to  being driven to great straights — he entered into
 a Treaty with some persons for the selling them a share in it: when it was nearly
 concluded the Counsel of one of them advised him it was not safe — It therefore
 broke off: and  the consequence was the unhappy man  being in urgent want of money with the the strongest assurances of success from his
 Counsel, was obliged  glad to accept  compound with the Deft for about 1/4 of what the value of   what 
 would have been his share on the partition.
 The Laws against Maintenance and Champerty are curious evidences  documents and the moral History
 One cannot look for more authentic or more conclusive evidence to prove  of the character at once  as well of the imperfection
 of the Law as  and  and the lawless and violent/ spirit of the People.   So violent and lawless were the
   people, that if a number of these agreed in any thing, it was  the probability was in favour of their
 doing mischief.  So ill-contrived and liable to abuse rough & liable to be out of order, was the Law mechanism that if two or three attempted
 to set it at work together with the view of doing producing mischief, it was probable they would succeed.
 Men had as much, or thought they had as much to apprehend from its exertion as from the event
 of it.   In some   pursuance of these strange notions which seemed to have been but too justly warranted,
 the spirit of union among the people was to be broken — and all sympathisers prosecuted.
 A man has a suit at Law.   Another man supplies him with money to carry it on?  It is as
 that justice might be done?   was it to save rescue poverty from oppression?  Impossible, says the Law.
  Of all the possible motives,
 the probable are but two
 then It would be but one out of 2 motives — to   The Deft with the   thing in dispute had exerted the 
 of the Lender, or the Deft was his enemy.   The Deft The man in the was to be made the an the instrument either of his Avarice
 or his revenge.
 The Deft  was to be harassed 
 by threats or by expence
 into a submission
MAINTEN: & Champerty. [BR][1]
| 
 Identifier: | JB/070/284/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.  | 
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| 
 070  | 
 of laws in general  | 
||
| 
 284  | 
 mainten: & champerty  | 
||
| 
 002  | 
|||
| 
 text sheet  | 
 1  | 
||
| 
 recto  | 
|||
| 
 jeremy bentham  | 
 [[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]  | 
||
| 
 23399  | 
|||