★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1829 Aug. 11<lb/> Reformists review.</head> <p><note>Peel<lb/> His Acts</note></p> <p> <note> 9<lb/> No reform as to<lb/> lengthiness in discourse</note> </p> <!-- number in pencil --> <p>(4)</p> <p>So much for the bulk of the whole. Now as to length of the the parts</p> <p> In <del>ordinary</del> <add><del> what <gap/></del>unlearned</add> discourse length of sentences — <!-- square brackets in pencil --> [distance between nominative<lb/> case and verb] has its <del>length</del> limit: in learned discourse<lb/> (<del><gap/></del> <add> meaning</add> always under matchless constitution)<lb/> it has none. Between the nominative <add>at the beginning</add> and the verb [<del>through</del> <add> at the end</add><lb/> <del> a whole length of it</del>] not fewer than four <add> of these</add> small-typed and<lb/> close-written pages: all this while panting <del> almost t</del> over<lb/> <del><gap/></del> the unhappy substantive looking with <unclear>unscripted</unclear> longing<lb/> for the moment of the so <add>his</add> long deferred union with his<lb/> beloved speech-fellow. No man <del><gap/></del> who either at Westminster<lb/> or S<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> Paul's has been <sic>whipt</sic> through either of the <unclear>pretient</unclear><lb/> grammars can be <del> at a loss to have</del> a stranger to the <gap/> <lb/> of the parts of speech as be the ordinary of with which they sigh<lb/> for each others <del>f</del> fond embrace. What would be <add>have been</add> the feelings<lb/> were <del>they</del> it their misfortune to fall into the <unclear>hands</unclear> of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Peel<lb/> or <add> of</add> one of his learned butchers? The days <add>times</add> <del>in which this</del> <lb/>which gave birth to those Statutes which his <gap/> operators <add> these operators of his</add><lb/> have taken for their model were those in which in a Romance<lb/>some <unclear>folio volume</unclear> would intervene between the day which<lb/>gave to the Hero and Heroine the first sight of each other, and<lb/> the night which first consigned them to the same place<lb/> of rue and rapture.</p> <!-- pencil lines across the page above and below final paragraph --> <p> In some eyes indignation rather than <gap/> might<lb/> seem the <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> <del>To</del> <add> called for by the occasion: but</add> the good humoured pleasantry is <add> at any rate</add> more pleasant<lb/>than | <head>1829 Aug. 11<lb/> Reformists review.</head> <p><note>Peel<lb/> His Acts</note></p> <p> <note> 9<lb/> No reform as to<lb/> lengthiness in discourse</note> </p> <!-- number in pencil --> <p>(4)</p> <p>So much for the bulk of the whole. Now as to length of the the parts</p> <p> In <del>ordinary</del> <add><del> what <gap/></del>unlearned</add> discourse length of sentences — <!-- square brackets in pencil --> [distance between nominative<lb/> case and verb] has its <del>length</del> limit: in learned discourse<lb/> (<del><gap/></del> <add> meaning</add> always under matchless constitution)<lb/> it has none. Between the nominative <add>at the beginning</add> and the verb [<del>through</del> <add> at the end</add><lb/> <del> a whole length of it</del>] not fewer than four <add> of these</add> small-typed and<lb/> close-written pages: all this while panting <del> almost t</del> over<lb/> <del><gap/></del> the unhappy substantive looking with <unclear>unscripted</unclear> longing<lb/> for the moment of the so <add>his</add> long deferred union with his<lb/> beloved speech-fellow. No man <del><gap/></del> who either at Westminster<lb/> or S<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> Paul's has been <sic>whipt</sic> through either of the <unclear>pretient</unclear><lb/> grammars can be <del> at a loss to have</del> a stranger to the <gap/> <lb/> of the parts of speech as be the ordinary of with which they sigh<lb/> for each others <del>f</del> fond embrace. What would be <add>have been</add> the feelings<lb/> were <del>they</del> it their misfortune to fall into the <unclear>hands</unclear> of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Peel<lb/> or <add> of</add> one of his learned butchers? The days <add>times</add> <del>in which this</del> <lb/>which gave birth to those Statutes which his <gap/> operators <add> these operators of his</add><lb/> have taken for their model were those in which in a Romance<lb/>some <unclear>folio volume</unclear> would intervene between the day which<lb/>gave to the Hero and Heroine the first sight of each other, and<lb/> the night which first consigned them to the same place<lb/> of rue and rapture.</p> <!-- pencil lines across the page above and below final paragraph --> <p> In some eyes indignation rather than <gap/> might<lb/> seem the <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> <del>To</del> <add> called for by the occasion: but</add> the good humoured pleasantry is <add> at any rate</add> more pleasant<lb/>than innovation: and, so long as malignation is kept down, sensibility<lb/> is the less grated upon and <del><gap/></del> wounded</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1829 Aug. 11
Reformists review.
Peel
His Acts
9
No reform as to
lengthiness in discourse
(4)
So much for the bulk of the whole. Now as to length of the the parts
In ordinary what unlearned discourse length of sentences — [distance between nominative
case and verb] has its length limit: in learned discourse
( meaning always under matchless constitution)
it has none. Between the nominative at the beginning and the verb [through at the end
a whole length of it] not fewer than four of these small-typed and
close-written pages: all this while panting almost t over
the unhappy substantive looking with unscripted longing
for the moment of the so his long deferred union with his
beloved speech-fellow. No man who either at Westminster
or St Paul's has been whipt through either of the pretient
grammars can be at a loss to have a stranger to the
of the parts of speech as be the ordinary of with which they sigh
for each others f fond embrace. What would be have been the feelings
were they it their misfortune to fall into the hands of Mr Peel
or of one of his learned butchers? The days times in which this
which gave birth to those Statutes which his operators these operators of his
have taken for their model were those in which in a Romance
some folio volume would intervene between the day which
gave to the Hero and Heroine the first sight of each other, and
the night which first consigned them to the same place
of rue and rapture.
In some eyes indignation rather than might
seem the To called for by the occasion: but the good humoured pleasantry is at any rate more pleasant
than innovation: and, so long as malignation is kept down, sensibility
is the less grated upon and wounded
|
Identifier: | JB/011/146/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-08-11 |
9 |
||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
146 |
reformists review |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
b&m 1829 |
||
|
arthur moore; richard doane |
|||
|
1829 |
|||
|
3843 |
|||
