JB/057/324/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/057/324/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1826. <del>March</del> April 7<lb/>Procedure <del>Constitutional</del> Code</head> <p><note><sic>ch.</sic> Evidence</note><lb/><!-- number in pencil --> (2 <note>&sect;. what sufficient</note></p> <p><note>3<lb/>Contrary practice in<lb/> English system &#x2014; Reason<lb/><sic>alledged</sic> that <add><del>prob</del></add> evidence<lb/>sufficiently <sic>probative</sic><lb/> of the <add><del>fact wrong</del></add> subject matter of<lb/> the demand must be<lb/> known to the pursuer</note></p> <p>Of this course the cause is an assumption than<lb/> what <del>a <gap/></del> a more <del>un</del> <sic>compleatly</sic> unwarranted one<lb/> can scarcely be conceived: and <add.to wit<a/dd> this is that of the demand<lb?> be just <del>whatsoever</del> the evidence which will be given <add>at the hearing</add><lb/> in support of it will in every particular be correctly<lb/> known to the pursuer or without his default would have<lb/> been known to him <sic>antecedently</sic> to the delivery of it<lb/> and in particular <sic>antecedently</sic> to the time of the delivery<lb/> of his demand: each mans right is then rendered<lb/> dependant on the appropriate <add>perfection of the</add> aptitude on all points of <del>the<lb/> witnesses</del> such persons as either were or are to have reason<lb/>to think were with relation to the facts in question <gap/><lb/> witnesses.  The consequence is &#x2014; that <del>if</del> as often as on<lb/> any one of these points a failure has place, <add> on the part of any one witness</add> the wrong<lb/> if he is the only witness to the point remaining for ever<lb/>unaddressed, the right to which he has a <add>just</add> title <sic>unestablished</sic> <lb/> the <add>distinction of</add> law <del><gap/></del> instead of receiving execution and effect, <del><gap/></del> frustrated.</p> <p><note>4<lb/> Power of oppression<lb/> given by this practice</note></p> <p.To every man who is wicked <Add>profligate</add> enough to avail<lb/> himself of it a power is thus given by the authors of the<lb/> law to entrap, vex and impoverish an adversary at<lb/> pleasure: <sic>extrajudicially</sic> he he <gap/> to a party wronged<lb/> and <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> delivers to him a false statement<lb/> <add>by</add> which if true the right of the party thus <gap/><lb/> not for deception to the benefit he has in contemplation<lb/> to demand would be adequately proved: <add>for</add> this statement though<lb/> false, <add> by the supposition false and mischievous</add> not being judicially delivered he is not either penitentially<lb/> or <gap/> responsible: when the demand comes <lb/> to a hearing, <add> so what</add> the <gap/> states there is not any thing but what<lb/> is true: for to the accomplishment of the <gap/> purpose, nothing that is not true is necessary.</p> 
<head>1826. <del>March</del> April 7<lb/>
Procedure <del>Constitutional</del> Code</head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Evidence</note><lb/>
<!-- number in pencil --> (2 <note>&sect;. what sufficient</note></p>


<p><note>3<lb/>
Contrary practice in<lb/>
English system &#x2014; Reason<lb/>
<sic>alledged</sic> that <add><del>prob</del></add> evidence<lb/>
sufficiently <sic>probative</sic><lb/>
of the <add><del>fact wrong</del></add> subject matter of<lb/>
the demand must be<lb/>
known to the pursuer</note></p>


<p>Of this error the cause is an assumption tha[t]<lb/>
while <del>a <gap/></del> a more <del>un</del> <sic>compleatly</sic> unwarranted one<lb/>
can scarcely be conceived: and <add>to wit</add> that is that of the demand<lb/>
be just <del>whatsoever</del> the evidence which will be given <add>at the hearing</add><lb/>
in support of it will in every particular be correctly<lb/>
known to the pursuer or without his default would have<lb/>
been known to him <sic>antecedently</sic> to the delivery of it<lb/>
and in particular <sic>antecedently</sic> to the time of the delivery<lb/>
of his demand: each mans right is then rendered<lb/>
dependant on the appropriate <add>perfection of the</add> aptitude on all points of <del>the<lb/>
witnesses</del> such persons as either were or as he has reason<lb/>
to think were with relation to the facts in question principal<lb/>
witnesses. The consequence is &#x2014; that <del>if</del> as often as on<lb/>
any one of these points a failure has place, <add> on the part of any one witness</add> the wrong<lb/>
if he is the only witness to the point remains for ever<lb/>
unaddressed, the right to which he has a <add>just</add> title <sic>unestablished</sic> <lb/>
the <add>distinction of</add> law <del><gap/></del> instead of receiving execution and effect,<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> frustrated.</p>
<p><note>4<lb/>
Power of oppression<lb/>
given by this practice</note></p>
<p>To every man who is wicked <add>profligate</add> enough to avail<lb/>
himself of it a power is thus given by the authors of the<lb/>
law to entrap, vex and impoverish an adversary at<lb/>
pleasure: <sic>extrajudicially</sic> he repairs to a party wronged<lb/>
and <del>states to him the fa</del> delivers to him a false statement<lb/>
<add>by</add> which if true the right of the party thus <unclear>asserted</unclear><lb/>
out for deception to the benefit he has in contemplation<lb/>
to demand would be adequately proved: <add>for</add> this statement though<lb/>
false, <add> by the supposition false and mischievous</add> not being judicially delivered he is not either punitorally<lb/>
or <sic>compensatorally</sic> responsible: when the demand comes <lb/>
to a hearing, <add>in what</add> the deceiver states there is not any thing but what<lb/>
is true: for to the accomplishment of its deceptitious purpose, nothing that is not true is necessary.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:58, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1826. March April 7

Procedure Constitutional Code

Ch. Evidence
(2 §. what sufficient

3
Contrary practice in
English system — Reason
alledged that prob evidence
sufficiently probative
of the fact wrong subject matter of
the demand must be
known to the pursuer

Of this error the cause is an assumption tha[t]
while a a more un compleatly unwarranted one
can scarcely be conceived: and to wit that is that of the demand
be just whatsoever the evidence which will be given at the hearing
in support of it will in every particular be correctly
known to the pursuer or without his default would have
been known to him antecedently to the delivery of it
and in particular antecedently to the time of the delivery
of his demand: each mans right is then rendered
dependant on the appropriate perfection of the aptitude on all points of the
witnesses
such persons as either were or as he has reason
to think were with relation to the facts in question principal
witnesses. The consequence is — that if as often as on
any one of these points a failure has place, on the part of any one witness the wrong
if he is the only witness to the point remains for ever
unaddressed, the right to which he has a just title unestablished
the distinction of law instead of receiving execution and effect,
frustrated.

4
Power of oppression
given by this practice

To every man who is wicked profligate enough to avail
himself of it a power is thus given by the authors of the
law to entrap, vex and impoverish an adversary at
pleasure: extrajudicially he repairs to a party wronged
and states to him the fa delivers to him a false statement
by which if true the right of the party thus asserted
out for deception to the benefit he has in contemplation
to demand would be adequately proved: for this statement though
false, by the supposition false and mischievous not being judicially delivered he is not either punitorally
or compensatorally responsible: when the demand comes
to a hearing, in what the deceiver states there is not any thing but what
is true: for to the accomplishment of its deceptitious purpose, nothing that is not true is necessary.



Identifier: | JB/057/324/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.

Date_1

1826-04-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

3-4

Box

057

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

324

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

18654

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in