JB/063/092/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/063/092/002: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<!-- this page is organised in two columns each with a margin to the left.   The text is written first in the top half of the page --> <head>CLASSIFICATION NEW. Observations on the 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Class.</head> <p><add>It must be confessed</add> This separation of the <sic><hi rend="underline">unterrific</hi></sic> from other<lb/><hi rend="underline">Homicides,</hi> is a departure from <sic><hi rend="underline">naturality</hi>:</sic><lb/> <add>one of the properties which we have enumerated among<lb/>the requisites in a scheme/method of classification</add> <lb/> <note> as believing to be<lb/> <add>attached to</add> as being in general<lb/> <add>among</add> <hi rend="underline">requisites</hi></note><lb/>The most obvious <add> conspicuous</add> characteristic of those which<lb/>I have inserted in this class, <del>as will</del> <add><del>being</del> is that</add> which<lb/>is common to them with those which I inserted<lb/> <note>have ranged under<lb/> the first</note> in the other, viz: the circumstance of death.<lb/>It is the most conspicuous, because it is the<lb/>only characteristic of either group, that offers <add>strikes</add><lb/><note>impresses directly<lb/> upon</note> itself <add>immediately/directly</add> to these faculties, which are common to <add>alike exercised</add><lb/> <add>by</add> all men, <hi rend="superscript">+</hi>, the <hi rend="underline">senses</hi>. For these characteristics</p> <!-- continues in the top of the right hand column --> <p>of each whereby they differ, are <add>to speak the truth</add> so far from<lb/> being conspicuous, <del>that is</del> <add> <sic>i.e.</sic></add> apprehended <del><gap/></del><lb/>readily, that to <add>by</add> many or perhaps most men<lb/> they have not been apprehended at all.</p> <!-- from the left hand column --> <p>+ Note. I am speaking now of the spectators,<lb/>those who contemplate <add>the transaction</add> in act or in idea: not<lb/>the patients, those who are the objects of it.</p> <!-- continuation of text form top right hand column --><p>Any inducement to this departure is no<lb/>other than the grand <add>&amp; as it appeared to me superior</add> purpose of making<lb/> the arrangement of <del><gap/></del> <add> the articles</add> subservient<lb/> to &amp; indicative <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note>+ or of I might so<lb/> <add>say</add> <sic>remeniscential</sic><lb/> of</note> of the principles [<add>for</add> of <add>their</add> <sic>&aelig;stimating</sic><lb/> them] whereby they are to be <sic>&aelig;stimated.</sic></p>  <!-- line in ink across the left hand column, continuation of text from the left hand column --> <p>A Classification is natural when it places<lb/>together those subjects which superficial<lb/><sic>observants</sic> would expect to find together.<lb/> <note> which man upon<lb/> a transitory survey</note> superficial observers &#x2014; those who know no more<lb/>of a subject than is suggested to them by <gap/><lb/>obvious properties and most apparently<lb/> interesting &#x2014; as different sorts of utility in place</p> <!-- continuation of text from the top right hand column --><p> The actuality of the arrangement depends<lb/> upon the identity or at least similarity<lb/> of the natural appearance, or physical<lb/><sic>phasis,</sic> as it might be called, of these articles<lb/> which are cast under the same division <hi rend="superscript"><del>||</del></hi> <note><del>||</del> general or hyper-general<lb/> denomination</note><lb/> But this <hi rend="underline">physical phasis</hi> is <add>of <del><gap/></del> several offences utterly</add> different from <hi rend="superscript">||</hi> <note>|| unconformable to</note><lb/> the <hi rend="underline">moral</hi> or (call it which you please), the<lb/> political) character; which character <add>in every instance</add> it is<lb/> the great <add> one grand</add> end of the science, according to<lb/>such rules of <sic>&aelig;stimation</sic> as shall; be found <del>|||</del><lb/><note><del>|||</del> subservient to the<lb/> end paramount, <del><gap/></del><lb/>the maxim[um]<add>ential</add><lb/>greatest <hi rend="underline">possible</hi> accumulation<lb/><add>[augmentation of]</add><lb/> of happiness.</note> legitimate, to investigate.</p> <!-- line in ink across the page.  start of bottom left side of the page --> <p>I know not however, whether the arrangement as<lb/> far as concerns these articles is not <add>even</add> calculated<lb/> impress itself the more forcibly upon the attention<lb/><note>establish <add>ground</add> itself</note> &amp; to fasten itself the deeper into the memory<lb/> from <add> the very circumstances of</add> its' <del>very</del> non-actuality, or contrast<lb/> to that method of arrangement, which is the<lb/> natural one.</p> <!-- line across the column in ink --> <p><del>For</del> In the 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Class, the consideration of pain<lb/><del>when it</del> where it occurs is merged in that<lb/> of danger.</p> <p>Pain and danger &#x2014; not two sorts of mischief,<lb/> but the same mischief viewed under the two <lb/> different faces of <hi rend="underline">actuality</hi> and <sic>contingence</sic><lb/> as happening, and as about to happen.<lb/> <note>[as alighting on]<lb/> any object on which<lb/> it could alight</note> Seeing one act, <del>without seeing any object</del> <add> not seeing the mischief of it, <unclear>since</unclear></add><lb/> <del>that was affected by it</del> <add>they saw not any object of <del>it</del> such mischief</add> at the same time<lb/> that without being very well able to tell<lb/> why, they were disposed to think it mischievous, </p><!-- end of bottom left hand quarter, continues in bottom right hand quarter --> <p>they called it a Crime against<lb/> the State, <del>and because</del> <add>seeing no pain</add> they could assign,<lb/> they could assign, they were apt to suppose<lb/> none to be produced: and that it<lb/> was not owing to it's producing pain,<lb/>but to an <del>unknown</del> <add> undefined</add> and unintelligible<lb/> something called mischief, (for mischief<lb/> <del>not</del> meaning neither pain nor pleasure, nor<lb/> the chance of either of them, is flatly unintelligible)<lb/> that an act became meet for punishment.</p> <p>In this distress, metaphor as usual came<lb/> to their aid (for when men cannot obtain<lb/> the ideas themselves that are wanted, they<lb/>will pay themselves with others they <add>suppose</add> they imagine<lb/> like them) <lb/> <note>with others <add>that very</add> supposed<add>ness</add><lb/> like those to make<lb/> you think you have</note></p> <p>The State is any thing to .....<lb/>it is an animal, and <del><gap/></del> offences give<lb/> a wound to it: it is a Pond, and an<lb/> offence is what disturbs it.  It is a great<lb/> animal having a number of little animals<lb/>belonging to it.  Peace, Religion, Government<lb/> &amp; so forth #<lb/><note> # any thing to avoid<lb/> saying those<lb/> three short irksome<lb/> words, I know not.</note></p> <!-- across the bottom of the page --> <p><sic>CLASSIFIC.</sic> Class III. Observations on the - [BR][ ][ ]</p>  
<!-- this page is organised in two columns each with a margin to the left. The text is written first in the top half of the page --> <head>CLASSIFICATION NEW. Observations on the 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Class.</head> <p><add>It must be confessed</add> This separation of the <sic><hi rend="underline">unterrific</hi></sic> from other<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Homicides,</hi> is a departure from <sic><hi rend="underline">naturality</hi>:</sic><lb/>
<add>one of the properties which we have enumerated among<lb/>
the requisites in a scheme/method of classification</add> <lb/>
<note> as believing to be<lb/>
<add>attached to</add> as being in general<lb/>
<add>among</add> <hi rend="underline">requisites</hi></note><lb/>
The most obvious <add> conspicuous</add> characteristic of those which<lb/>
I have inserted in this class, <del>as will</del> <add><del>being</del> is that</add> which<lb/>
is common to them with those which I inserted<lb/>
<note>have ranged under<lb/>
the first</note> in the other, viz: the circumstance of death.<lb/>
It is the most conspicuous, because it is the<lb/>
only characteristic of either group, that offers <add>strikes</add><lb/>
<note>impresses directly<lb/>
upon</note> itself <add>immediately/directly</add> to these faculties, which are common to <add>alike exercised</add><lb/>
<add>by</add> all men, <hi rend="superscript">+</hi>, the <hi rend="underline">senses</hi>. For these characteristics</p>


<!-- continues in the top of the right hand column --> <p>of each whereby they differ, are <add>to speak the truth</add> so far from<lb/>
being conspicuous, <del>that is</del> <add> <sic>i.e.</sic></add> apprehended <del><gap/></del><lb/>
readily, that to <add>by</add> many or perhaps most men<lb/>
they have not been apprehended at all.</p>


<!-- from the left hand column --> <p>+ Note. I am speaking now of the spectators,<lb/>
those who contemplate <add>the transaction</add> in act or in idea: not<lb/>
the patients, those who are the objects of it.</p>
<!-- continuation of text form top right hand column --><p>Any inducement to this departure is no<lb/>
other than the grand <add>&amp; as it appeared to me superior</add> purpose of making<lb/>
the arrangement of <del><gap/></del> <add> the articles</add> subservient<lb/>
to &amp; indicative <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note>+ or of I might so<lb/>
<add>say</add> <sic>remeniscential</sic><lb/>
of</note> of the principles [<add>for</add> of <add>their</add> <sic>&aelig;stimating</sic><lb/>
them] whereby they are to be <sic>&aelig;stimated.</sic></p>
<!-- line in ink across the left hand column, continuation of text from the left hand column --> <p>A Classification is natural when it places<lb/>
together those subjects which superficial<lb/>
<sic>observants</sic> would expect to find together.<lb/>
<note> which man upon<lb/>
a transitory survey</note> superficial observers &#x2014; those who know no more<lb/>
of a subject than is suggested to them by <gap/><lb/>
obvious properties and most apparently<lb/>
interesting &#x2014; as different sorts of utility in place</p>
<!-- continuation of text from the top right hand column --><p> The actuality of the arrangement depends<lb/>
upon the identity or at least similarity<lb/>
of the natural appearance, or physical<lb/>
<sic>phasis,</sic> as it might be called, of these articles<lb/>
which are cast under the same division <hi rend="superscript"><del>||</del></hi> <note><del>||</del> general or hyper-general<lb/>
denomination</note><lb/>
But this <hi rend="underline">physical phasis</hi> is <add>of <del><gap/></del> several offences utterly</add> different from <hi rend="superscript">||</hi> <note>|| unconformable to</note><lb/>
the <hi rend="underline">moral</hi> or (call it which you please), the<lb/>
political) character; which character <add>in every instance</add> it is<lb/>
the great <add> one grand</add> end of the science, according to<lb/>
such rules of <sic>&aelig;stimation</sic> as shall; be found <del>|||</del><lb/>
<note><del>|||</del> subservient to the<lb/>
end paramount, <del><gap/></del><lb/>
the maxim[um]<add>ential</add><lb/>
greatest <hi rend="underline">possible</hi> accumulation<lb/>
<add>[augmentation of]</add><lb/>
of happiness.</note> legitimate, to investigate.</p>
<!-- line in ink across the page. start of bottom left side of the page --> <p>I know not however, whether the arrangement as<lb/>
far as concerns these articles is not <add>even</add> calculated<lb/>
impress itself the more forcibly upon the attention<lb/>
<note>establish <add>ground</add> itself</note> &amp; to fasten itself the deeper into the memory<lb/>
from <add> the very circumstances of</add> its' <del>very</del> non-actuality, or contrast<lb/>
to that method of arrangement, which is the<lb/>
natural one.</p>
<!-- line across the column in ink --> <p><del>For</del> In the 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Class, the consideration of pain<lb/>
<del>when it</del> where it occurs is merged in that<lb/>
of danger.</p>
<p>Pain and danger &#x2014; not two sorts of mischief,<lb/>
but the same mischief viewed under the two <lb/>
different faces of <hi rend="underline">actuality</hi> and <sic>contingence</sic><lb/>
as happening, and as about to happen.<lb/>
<note>[as alighting on]<lb/>
any object on which<lb/>
it could alight</note> Seeing one act, <del>without seeing any object</del> <add> not seeing the mischief of it, <unclear>since</unclear></add><lb/>
<del>that was affected by it</del> <add>they saw not any object of <del>it</del> such mischief</add> at the same time<lb/>
that without being very well able to tell<lb/>
why, they were disposed to think it mischievous, </p>
<!-- end of bottom left hand quarter, continues in bottom right hand quarter --> <p>they called it a Crime against<lb/>
the State, <del>and because</del> <add>seeing no pain</add> they could assign,<lb/>
they could assign, they were apt to suppose<lb/>
none to be produced: and that it<lb/>
was not owing to it's producing pain,<lb/>
but to an <del>unknown</del> <add> undefined</add> and unintelligible<lb/>
something called mischief, (for mischief<lb/>
<del>not</del> meaning neither pain nor pleasure, nor<lb/>
the chance of either of them, is flatly unintelligible)<lb/>
that an act became meet for punishment.</p>
<p>In this distress, metaphor as usual came<lb/>
to their aid (for when men cannot obtain<lb/>
the ideas themselves that are wanted, they<lb/>
will pay themselves with others they <add>suppose</add> they imagine<lb/>
like them) <lb/>
<note>with others <add>that very</add> supposed<add>ness</add><lb/>
like those to make<lb/>
you think you have</note></p>
<p>The State is any thing to .....<lb/>
it is an animal, and <del><gap/></del> offences give<lb/>
a wound to it: it is a Pond, and an<lb/>
offence is what disturbs it. It is a great<lb/>
animal having a number of little animals<lb/>
belonging to it. Peace, Religion, Government<lb/>
&amp; so forth #<lb/>
<note> # any thing to avoid<lb/>
saying those<lb/>
three short irksome<lb/>
words, I know not.</note></p>
<!-- across the bottom of the page --> <p><sic>CLASSIFIC.</sic> Class III. Observations on the - [BR][ ][ ]</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:01, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

CLASSIFICATION NEW. Observations on the 3d Class.

It must be confessed This separation of the unterrific from other
Homicides, is a departure from naturality:
one of the properties which we have enumerated among
the requisites in a scheme/method of classification

as believing to be
attached to as being in general
among requisites

The most obvious conspicuous characteristic of those which
I have inserted in this class, as will being is that which
is common to them with those which I inserted
have ranged under
the first
in the other, viz: the circumstance of death.
It is the most conspicuous, because it is the
only characteristic of either group, that offers strikes
impresses directly
upon
itself immediately/directly to these faculties, which are common to alike exercised
by all men, +, the senses. For these characteristics

of each whereby they differ, are to speak the truth so far from
being conspicuous, that is i.e. apprehended
readily, that to by many or perhaps most men
they have not been apprehended at all.

+ Note. I am speaking now of the spectators,
those who contemplate the transaction in act or in idea: not
the patients, those who are the objects of it.

Any inducement to this departure is no
other than the grand & as it appeared to me superior purpose of making
the arrangement of the articles subservient
to & indicative + + or of I might so
say remeniscential
of
of the principles [for of their æstimating
them] whereby they are to be æstimated.

A Classification is natural when it places
together those subjects which superficial
observants would expect to find together.
which man upon
a transitory survey
superficial observers — those who know no more
of a subject than is suggested to them by
obvious properties and most apparently
interesting — as different sorts of utility in place

The actuality of the arrangement depends
upon the identity or at least similarity
of the natural appearance, or physical
phasis, as it might be called, of these articles
which are cast under the same division || || general or hyper-general
denomination

But this physical phasis is of several offences utterly different from || || unconformable to
the moral or (call it which you please), the
political) character; which character in every instance it is
the great one grand end of the science, according to
such rules of æstimation as shall; be found |||
||| subservient to the
end paramount,
the maxim[um]ential
greatest possible accumulation
[augmentation of]
of happiness.
legitimate, to investigate.

I know not however, whether the arrangement as
far as concerns these articles is not even calculated
impress itself the more forcibly upon the attention
establish ground itself & to fasten itself the deeper into the memory
from the very circumstances of its' very non-actuality, or contrast
to that method of arrangement, which is the
natural one.

For In the 3d Class, the consideration of pain
when it where it occurs is merged in that
of danger.

Pain and danger — not two sorts of mischief,
but the same mischief viewed under the two
different faces of actuality and contingence
as happening, and as about to happen.
[as alighting on]
any object on which
it could alight
Seeing one act, without seeing any object not seeing the mischief of it, since
that was affected by it they saw not any object of it such mischief at the same time
that without being very well able to tell
why, they were disposed to think it mischievous,

they called it a Crime against
the State, and because seeing no pain they could assign,
they could assign, they were apt to suppose
none to be produced: and that it
was not owing to it's producing pain,
but to an unknown undefined and unintelligible
something called mischief, (for mischief
not meaning neither pain nor pleasure, nor
the chance of either of them, is flatly unintelligible)
that an act became meet for punishment.

In this distress, metaphor as usual came
to their aid (for when men cannot obtain
the ideas themselves that are wanted, they
will pay themselves with others they suppose they imagine
like them)
with others that very supposedness
like those to make
you think you have

The State is any thing to .....
it is an animal, and offences give
a wound to it: it is a Pond, and an
offence is what disturbs it. It is a great
animal having a number of little animals
belonging to it. Peace, Religion, Government
& so forth #
# any thing to avoid
saying those
three short irksome
words, I know not.

CLASSIFIC. Class III. Observations on the - [BR][ ][ ]



Identifier: | JB/063/092/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 63.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

063

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

092

Info in main headings field

classific. class iii observations on the

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

20281

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in