JB/004/044/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/004/044/002: Difference between revisions

Annieb2 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/004/044/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/004/044/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<!-- printed -->
<head>20 MINUTES OF EVIDENCE BEFORE SELECT COMMITTEE</head>
 
<note>William Earl,<lb/>
Esq,<lb/>
}<lb/>
22 February, <lb/>
1825,<lb/>
</note>
 
<p>judgment, his costs amount to about 10l. and the defendants' costs to 9l.; therefore<lb/>
the defendant losing the verdicts pays 10l. to the plaintiff, and somewhere about 9l.<lb/>
for his own expenses.
</p>
 
<p>
Then, if a cheaper court was established, having concurrent jurisdiction with the<lb/>
Marshalsea court up to 10 l. it would very much  diminish the business of the Marshalsea<lb/>
court? &#x2014; In my opinion it would</p>
 
<p>
What is the sum which you gave the purchase of a right of pleading in that<lb/>
court? &#x2014; I gave 2,000 l,; two men in the court have since given more. <lb/>
</p>
 
<p>
Is the business pretty equally divided between the counsel, in that court? &#x2014; The<lb/>
business is of two description, the defended causes, and the writs of inquiry, where<lb/>
there is no defence; in the defended causes all the four counsel are usually employed, <lb/>
in the undefended ones only two<lb/>
</p>
 
<p>
Then, in the undefended causes, is the business pretty equally divided among the<lb/>
four, or are there two that would be considered the leading counsel, that get more <lb/>
business than the others? &#x2014; In the undefended causes the business is equally divided <lb/>
among the junior counsel, and unequally among the senior.
</p>
<p>
By whom are the counsel selected, by the parties or by the court? &#x2014; By the parties. <lb/>
Is it entirely at the option of the parties which counsel they shall employ? &#x2014; Yes.<lb/>
Then of course if any two of the counsel have the reputation of being very superior <lb/>
to the others, they would get a great deal the most business? &#x2014; Certainly.<lb/>
How do you conceive that it would be possible to estimate the compensation to <lb/>
</p>
 
<p>
That change entirely depends upon the option of the parties who bring their causes<lb/>
before that court? &#x2014; It does so. <lb/>
That is to say, it depends upon the relative abilities of the counsel employed? &#x2014;<lb/>
In the execution of writs of inquiry there is little need of great ability. <lb/>
</p>
 
<p>
Something or other directs the choice, and whatever that is, does it not create a <lb/>
difficulty in estimating the compensation? &#x2014; Among the four there is a loss sustained; <lb/>
whether the compensation would be fairly divided between the four, is another <lb/>
question; but certainly, from among the four there would be a large sum subtracted<lb/>
by the County Courts Bill.<lb/>
</p>
 
<p>
Upon the established of the court of requests in Southwark, the four counsel<lb/>
each of the them received an annuity of 50 l. per year during the time he held the<lb/>
office? &#x2014; I believe so.<lb/>
 
</p>
 
<p>
But in the present state of the court, any fixed annuity might be too much for<lb/>
some, and too little for others, as compensation ffor their loss; supposing for instance, <lb/>
that an annuity was voted to the court generally, if that was divided equally among<lb/>
the counsel, it would not be a just division? &#x2014; It would be a division, of which the <lb/>
counsel themselves would not complain.<lb/>
 
</p>
 
 
 
 
 
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:12, 23 November 2021

Click Here To Edit


Identifier: | JB/004/044/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.

Date_1

1825-05-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

004

Main Headings

lord brougham displayed

Folio number

044

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

county courts bill / minutes of evidence / taken before the select committee on the / bill / for preventing delays and expenses in the proceedings of county courts, and for the more easy and speedy recovery of small debts, in england and wales

Category

printed material

Number of Pages

36

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

(6-35)

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

1965

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in