JB/035/090/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/035/090/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
<!-- indent --> <p>
<!-- indent --> <p>
There is no law properly so called, no passage<lb/> in any Statute that gives any definition of a<lb/> libel.</p>
There is no law properly so called, no passage<lb/> in any Statute that gives any definition of a<lb/> libel.</p>
<p><!-- indent -->
<p><!-- indent -->
There is no such thing as any definition<lb/> of a libel to be met with in any <add>judicial</add> decision, or<lb/> in any <add>pages of any </add> book which has been recognized by any<lb/> decision to be law</p>  
There is no such thing as any definition<lb/> of a libel to be met with in any <add>judicial</add> decision, or<lb/> in any <add>passage of any </add> book which has been recognized by any<lb/> decision to be law</p>  
 
 


<!-- indent --><p>
<del>There is</del> No definition of a libel can be<lb/> collected from the tenor of the decisions on prosecutions<lb/> for libels, unless it be such an one as<lb/> is altogether incompatible with the right of giving<lb/> any opinion of approbation or disapprobation of<lb/> the conduct of men in power, and to the people's right in quality of constituents of collecting<lb/> grounds for their conduct in the choice of their<lb/> representations. </p>


<!-- indent --><p>
Either therefore there is no law at all in<lb/> matters of libel or there is such a law as <del>the</del><lb/> is altogether repugnant to <del>that part of the constitution</del><lb/> the legal existence of what ever portion of political liberty the nation has ever <add>is or ever has been</add> <hi rend='underline'><foreign>de facto</foreign></hi> been possessed of.</p>




Line 30: Line 33:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:46, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

There is no law properly so called, no passage
in any Statute that gives any definition of a
libel.

There is no such thing as any definition
of a libel to be met with in any judicial decision, or
in any passage of any book which has been recognized by any
decision to be law

There is No definition of a libel can be
collected from the tenor of the decisions on prosecutions
for libels, unless it be such an one as
is altogether incompatible with the right of giving
any opinion of approbation or disapprobation of
the conduct of men in power, and to the people's right in quality of constituents of collecting
grounds for their conduct in the choice of their
representations.

Either therefore there is no law at all in
matters of libel or there is such a law as the
is altogether repugnant to that part of the constitution
the legal existence of what ever portion of political liberty the nation has ever is or ever has been de facto been possessed of.












Identifier: | JB/035/090/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

090

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::floyd & co [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur young

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10683

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in