JB/004/160/001

Click Here To Edit

1830 July 26 M
Review

Optimum
reinquiry
Removal
per J.B. 1

Reinquiry and Removal

Re-inquiry and Removal as applied to Judicial inquiries

In any suit By every
separate course of
enquiry a fresh mode
of expence & delay
generated

Take any individual suit whatsoever

By every separate course of enquiry applied to
the relevant matters of fact, real and supposed, which
it has happened to the individual send or furnish,
a fresh mass of expense and delay is of course generated.
To Of the evils evil thus correspondent and opposite to the ends
of justice, to render the mass as small as possible
consistently with the other — the main end of justice,
namely right decision is of course on the part of
Mr Bentham among the constant objects of his
endeavours

Under JB's system
right decision among
the constant objects

Of this theory, what in this instance is the consequence
in practice

Exceptions excepted
Removal & reinquiry
one and no more

For In the Appellate judicatory
no fresh additional
mass of evidence but
examination of the
judgement of the Immediate
judicatory on the same evidence
as recorded by the Registrar

Exceptions excepted — removal — fresh additional enquiry
one and no more, from the judicatory of immediate
jurisdiction to the Judicatory of appellate jurisdiction
Removal, yes. But for what purpose? of
an additional mass & body of evidence? No,
surely: for in the Immediate judicatory as firm a ground
for the decision of that the Judges judging all the evidence the case
has afforded will be have been endeavoured to be disclosed: and
after the close of the budget should chance
have brought to view any new and unexpected piece of
evidence, that same Judicatory will be the judicatory in
which it is disclosed.

For the Appellate Judicatory what therefore is it
that remains: What but argumentation: ground subject
matter of reference on the question of l, the appropriate
is Article of the Code: on the question of fact, the evidence as minuted
set down under the care of the Registrar, and copy thereof which
in
his place will have
been made without expence
other than that of
the mere paper, transmitted
to the Appellate
Judicatories

Identifier: | JB/004/160/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.
Date_1	1830-07-26	Marginal Summary Numbering	not numbered
Box	004	Main Headings	lord brougham displayed
Folio number	160	Info in main headings field	review
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c1
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	george bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	2081
Box Contents