★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/004/283/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/004/283/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1830 June 22<lb/> | |||
<head>Review</head></p> | |||
<p>Such being the arrangements proposed, now for the <del><gap/></del> <gap/><lb/> | |||
by which in the character of motives or say inducements<lb/> | |||
the proposal for those same arrangements was produced.<lb/> | |||
There <add>Here</add> they are, and he that runs may read them. Benefit<lb/> | |||
<gap/> – benefit to be preserved in the hands of the <add><gap/></add> possessor<lb/> | |||
the profit capable of being made out of the expence of all<lb/><lb/> | |||
the suits having for their subject matter money to an amount<lb/> | |||
exceeding that to which the limitation stands applied.<lb/> | |||
<del>In <gap/></del> Maximum allowed to be obtained, in one case<lb/> | |||
£5, in another case, £50 in another case again – £100.<lb/> | |||
Will M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Brougham say –will Sir Robert Peel say – will anybody<lb/> | |||
say why the same proof which is sufficient to persuade<lb/> | |||
the Judge that goods to the value of £5 have <add>had even</add> been transferred<lb/> | |||
from plaintiff to defendant might not serve for the<lb/> | |||
case where goods of the same quantity were furnished to the<lb/> | |||
amount of £50 or £100 or any greater sum. Can<lb/> | |||
he say why <del><gap/></del> for proof of the £5 worth thus stated<lb/> | |||
be one sort of judicatory, for the £50 worth, another<lb/> | |||
and so on. So much as to the limitation.</p> | |||
<p>So likewise as to the exception.</p> | |||
<p>But the patronage of those £ <unclear>sums</unclear> Local judicatories<lb/> | |||
being taken out of the hands of the Lord Chancellor<lb/> | |||
are placed in those of the Home Secretary, here may be<lb/> | |||
seen one motive <del>by the force of which</del> <add>in which</add> the Home Secretary for<lb/> | |||
the time being joined on <add>one</add> <unclear>adequate</unclear> inducement to join on<lb/> | |||
the giving existence to that same arrangement.</p> | |||
<p>But by Codification <add>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Brougham with his Code</add> all those maximums together<lb/> | |||
with so many other protuberances would be laid low,<lb/> | |||
hence one cause of the Home Secretarys <unclear>undissembled</unclear><lb/> | |||
horror of Codification.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1830 June 22
Review
Such being the arrangements proposed, now for the
by which in the character of motives or say inducements
the proposal for those same arrangements was produced.
There Here they are, and he that runs may read them. Benefit
– benefit to be preserved in the hands of the possessor
the profit capable of being made out of the expence of all
the suits having for their subject matter money to an amount
exceeding that to which the limitation stands applied.
In Maximum allowed to be obtained, in one case
£5, in another case, £50 in another case again – £100.
Will Mr Brougham say –will Sir Robert Peel say – will anybody
say why the same proof which is sufficient to persuade
the Judge that goods to the value of £5 have had even been transferred
from plaintiff to defendant might not serve for the
case where goods of the same quantity were furnished to the
amount of £50 or £100 or any greater sum. Can
he say why for proof of the £5 worth thus stated
be one sort of judicatory, for the £50 worth, another
and so on. So much as to the limitation.
So likewise as to the exception.
But the patronage of those £ sums Local judicatories
being taken out of the hands of the Lord Chancellor
are placed in those of the Home Secretary, here may be
seen one motive by the force of which in which the Home Secretary for
the time being joined on one adequate inducement to join on
the giving existence to that same arrangement.
But by Codification Mr Brougham with his Code all those maximums together
with so many other protuberances would be laid low,
hence one cause of the Home Secretarys undissembled
horror of Codification.
|
Identifier: | JB/004/283/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1830-07-22 |
|||
|
004 |
lord brougham displayed |
||
|
283 |
review |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c5 / c1 / e1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
2204 |
|||
