★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/004/299/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/004/299/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1830. July 29<lb/> | |||
<head>Review.</head></p> | |||
<p>Behold now the use of this <gap/> to <add>the cause of</add> justice and<lb/> | |||
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Bentham. They work by <hi rend="underline">estoppel</hi>: and working by<lb/> | |||
estoppel, they work well: estoppel being a more effectual<lb/> | |||
conclusion and <gap/> <add>plan</add> as well as shorter plan than the<lb/> | |||
shortest of those which the Schedule is employed in the endeavour<lb/> | |||
so far to impose upon the would-be suitor as to<lb/> | |||
make them <add>be</add> regarded as <unclear>fewer</unclear> specimens of the length which<lb/> | |||
will be actually occupied by the several <unclear>plantings</unclear> should<lb/> | |||
it be the destiny of this <unclear>Suitor-trust</unclear> <add>species of <gap/> trust</add> to be set by the authorized<lb/> | |||
hands, and Suitor to be accordingly caught in <add>by</add> it.</p> | |||
<p>Among the <unclear>scenes</unclear> held up by him to view, that of<lb/> | |||
the parties on both sides appearing <del>in <gap/></del> either of them<lb/> | |||
in the presence of the other, <gap/> of <gap/> when in <gap/> of<lb/> | |||
each other in the presence of the Judge. True it is that in this<lb/> | |||
case as to the checking of their evidence there will <del>appear</del> depend<lb/> | |||
in most instances perhaps in every instance upon the pleasure of<lb/> | |||
the Judge – this so well <gap/> Judge. Nor has any suitor<lb/> | |||
been found in which a right has been given to either party, <add>either in express terms, or by implication</add><lb/> | |||
to present himself in Court <gap/> for <gap/> address himself<lb/> | |||
to the Judge. Still however a sort of <gap/> <del>can</del><lb/> | |||
<unclear>admission</unclear> is thus made by him – namely that appearances<lb/> | |||
of the parties in presence of each other and of the Judge <del>on the</del> <add>with</add><lb/> | |||
the <gap/> of their respective testaments at that same time on<lb/> | |||
the occasion of a suit is not incompatible with justice. This<lb/> | |||
in a mode or course of proceeding so indisputably regular so<lb/> | |||
opposite to the <add>summary of the</add> only course in which it is possible for <unclear>justice</unclear> to be<lb/> | |||
done, is an admission of no small importance: an estoppel of no<lb/> | |||
small compass: and this ground once obtained <unclear>thereupon</unclear> can the<lb/> | |||
question if in that cause why not in this, and this and this other case?</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1830. July 29
Review.
Behold now the use of this to the cause of justice and
Mr Bentham. They work by estoppel: and working by
estoppel, they work well: estoppel being a more effectual
conclusion and plan as well as shorter plan than the
shortest of those which the Schedule is employed in the endeavour
so far to impose upon the would-be suitor as to
make them be regarded as fewer specimens of the length which
will be actually occupied by the several plantings should
it be the destiny of this Suitor-trust species of trust to be set by the authorized
hands, and Suitor to be accordingly caught in by it.
Among the scenes held up by him to view, that of
the parties on both sides appearing in either of them
in the presence of the other, of when in of
each other in the presence of the Judge. True it is that in this
case as to the checking of their evidence there will appear depend
in most instances perhaps in every instance upon the pleasure of
the Judge – this so well Judge. Nor has any suitor
been found in which a right has been given to either party, either in express terms, or by implication
to present himself in Court for address himself
to the Judge. Still however a sort of can
admission is thus made by him – namely that appearances
of the parties in presence of each other and of the Judge on the with
the of their respective testaments at that same time on
the occasion of a suit is not incompatible with justice. This
in a mode or course of proceeding so indisputably regular so
opposite to the summary of the only course in which it is possible for justice to be
done, is an admission of no small importance: an estoppel of no
small compass: and this ground once obtained thereupon can the
question if in that cause why not in this, and this and this other case?
Identifier: | JB/004/299/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1830-07-29 |
|||
004 |
lord brougham displayed |
||
299 |
review |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e2 |
||
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1829 |
||
jonathan blenman |
|||
1829 |
|||
2220 |
|||