JB/011/200/008: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/011/200/008: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>8</head>
 
<p>This Characteristic applies also the Measure itself. That<lb/>
 
Consolidation Bills, so styled, has passed from time to time,<lb/>
is evidenced by the Statute-Book; but, in truth, these bills<lb/>
have been the substituting of one system for another. So<lb/>
much of the ancient system as was deemed compatible<lb/>
with existing relations has been retained, the residue rejected;<lb/>
and such additions as those relations demanded<lb/>
have been made. This, however, has been achieved<lb/>
either by the Government of the country, or by those individuals<lb/>
in whom the Government have placed their<lb/>
confidence, or whom, from their eminence, they deemed<lb/>
worthy of discretionary power. But suppose that, after<lb/>
the conference between the two Houses in 1816, and<lb/>
the result to which it led, (the abandoning of the present<lb/>
measure as impracticable,) an individual had submitted to<lb/>
the legislature a reform of any given department of the<lb/>
law, for example, the Criminal Law. They would naturally<lb/>
have said, "Show us the precise state of the existing law,<lb/>
with all its crudities and imperfections, that we may be<lb/>
enabled to judge to what extent you retain the existing<lb/>
system, and in what particulars you repudiate it. We have<lb/>
only your own conviction of the nature, extent, and propriety<lb/>
of the change which you advocate; and we must be<lb/>
furnished with proper means for deciding upon the value of<lb/>
your judgment." This was exactly my own situation, and<lb/>
it therefore became incumbent on me to do this. The<lb/>
difficulty lies in ascertaining the precise influence which a<lb/>
series of enactments, relating to the same subject, have had<lb/>
upon each other. And it may with confidence, and, it is</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:52, 16 March 2020

Click Here To Edit

8

This Characteristic applies also the Measure itself. That
Consolidation Bills, so styled, has passed from time to time,
is evidenced by the Statute-Book; but, in truth, these bills
have been the substituting of one system for another. So
much of the ancient system as was deemed compatible
with existing relations has been retained, the residue rejected;
and such additions as those relations demanded
have been made. This, however, has been achieved
either by the Government of the country, or by those individuals
in whom the Government have placed their
confidence, or whom, from their eminence, they deemed
worthy of discretionary power. But suppose that, after
the conference between the two Houses in 1816, and
the result to which it led, (the abandoning of the present
measure as impracticable,) an individual had submitted to
the legislature a reform of any given department of the
law, for example, the Criminal Law. They would naturally
have said, "Show us the precise state of the existing law,
with all its crudities and imperfections, that we may be
enabled to judge to what extent you retain the existing
system, and in what particulars you repudiate it. We have
only your own conviction of the nature, extent, and propriety
of the change which you advocate; and we must be
furnished with proper means for deciding upon the value of
your judgment." This was exactly my own situation, and
it therefore became incumbent on me to do this. The
difficulty lies in ascertaining the precise influence which a
series of enactments, relating to the same subject, have had
upon each other. And it may with confidence, and, it is



Identifier: | JB/011/200/008"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1826

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

200

Info in main headings field

Image

008

Titles

a letter to the members of the different circuits

Category

printed material

Number of Pages

23

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

3897

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in