JB/071/186/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/071/186/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
<head>Of Frauds<!-- 2 words, larger font --> relative to the Coin<!-- 1 word, larger font -->.</head>   
<head>Of Frauds<!-- 2 words, larger font --> relative to the Coin<!-- 1 word, larger font -->.</head>   
<!-- second horizontal line of header -->
<!-- second horizontal line of header -->
<p><note>The infamy will not be so intolerable in this case as in others.</note> this as in other cases . It is <add>indeed</add> a general rule that a punishment
<p><note>The infamy will not be so intolerable in this case as in others.</note> this as in other cases. It is <add>indeed</add> a general rule that a punishment
<lb/>
<lb/>
which points a man out as infamous ought to be confined
which points a man out as infamous ought to be confined
Line 16: Line 16:
and that it ought not to be inflicted on any who are suffered
and that it ought not to be inflicted on any who are suffered
<lb/>
<lb/>
to mix again in Society. In the case of such offences
to mix again in Society. In the case of such offences
<lb/>
<lb/>
of rapacity as are the <add>effects</add> <del>Case</del> of indigence the indelible
of rapacity as are the <add>effects</add> <del>Case</del> of indigence the indelible
<lb/>
<lb/>
Stigma seems liable to this dilemma . Either it will have
Stigma seems liable to this dilemma. Either it will have
<lb/>
<lb/>
the effect of excluding the criminal out of all honest Society
the effect of excluding the criminal out of all honest Society
<lb/>
<lb/>
or not. If it has he must either perish or enter
or not. If it has he must either perish or enter
<lb/>
<lb/>
into a gang with others in the same condition and go
into a gang with others in the same condition and go
<lb/>
<lb/>
on robbing, for a Subsistence. If it has not, the danger is,
on robbing, for a Subsistence. If it has not, the danger is,
<lb/>
<lb/>
lest, by becoming familiar, it should fall into contempt.
lest, by becoming familiar, it should fall into contempt.
Line 34: Line 34:
<p><!-- indent -->In the Case of Coining this dilemma applies not with
<p><!-- indent -->In the Case of Coining this dilemma applies not with
<lb/>
<lb/>
equal force. A coiner, it should seem does not seem so criminal
equal force. A coiner, it should seem does not seem so criminal
<lb/>
<lb/>
either in his own eyes or in those of his neighbours
either in his own eyes or in those of his neighbours
Line 40: Line 40:
as a Thief or Sharper.  His crime is not so repugnant as theirs
as a Thief or Sharper.  His crime is not so repugnant as theirs
<lb/>
<lb/>
to the social feelings : it indicates not so <add>depraved</add> <del>corrupt</del> a disposition. <add><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi></add> <note>+ See Introd. Ch. Of Dispositions .</note>   
to the social feelings: it indicates not so <add>depraved</add> <del>corrupt</del> a disposition. <add><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi></add> <note>+ See Introd. Ch. Of Dispositions.</note>   
<lb/>
<lb/>
<unclear>he</unclear><!-- the whole of the first letter is not visible, but 'he' makes sense in the context of the sentence --> has no near prospect of the unhappiness he is instumen<add>tal</add>  
<unclear>he</unclear><!-- the whole of the first letter is not visible, but 'he' makes sense in the context of the sentence --> has no near prospect of the unhappiness he is instumen<add>tal</add>  
Line 47: Line 47:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:05, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


65 C Of Frauds relative to the Coin.

The infamy will not be so intolerable in this case as in others. this as in other cases. It is indeed a general rule that a punishment
which points a man out as infamous ought to be confined
to such offenders as are condemned to perpetual confinement;
and that it ought not to be inflicted on any who are suffered
to mix again in Society. In the case of such offences
of rapacity as are the effects Case of indigence the indelible
Stigma seems liable to this dilemma. Either it will have
the effect of excluding the criminal out of all honest Society
or not. If it has he must either perish or enter
into a gang with others in the same condition and go
on robbing, for a Subsistence. If it has not, the danger is,
lest, by becoming familiar, it should fall into contempt.

In the Case of Coining this dilemma applies not with
equal force. A coiner, it should seem does not seem so criminal
either in his own eyes or in those of his neighbours
as a Thief or Sharper. His crime is not so repugnant as theirs
to the social feelings: it indicates not so depraved corrupt a disposition. + + See Introd. Ch. Of Dispositions.
he has no near prospect of the unhappiness he is instumental



Identifier: | JB/071/186/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 71.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

071

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

186

Info in main headings field

of frauds relative to the coin

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f65 / f66 / f67 / f68

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::myears [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline fox

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23589

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in