JB/034/157/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/034/157/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/157/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/157/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1823 Sept. 6<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Constitutional</head></p>
 
<p>Of its general inaptitude, <del>the notion</del> whatever favourable conception<lb/>
 
has place is founded <add>it will be seen</add> an illusion.  Of this illusion an effect<lb/>
 
is – the causing it <add>the institution</add> to be regarded as adequate to its <add>more</add> principally<lb/>
intended purpose – namely serving as a bridle to the<lb/>
power of the Judge.  That in this character it has some <add><del><gap/></del></add> effect<lb/>
is altogether above dispute:  <del>but that the</del> witness what difference<lb/>
there is between the English mitigated and the Continental unmitigated<lb/>
despotism.  But that this effect is widely short of adequate<lb/>
but too <gap/>:  witness the difference between<lb/>
the sacrifice made of the interest of the many in England, and<lb/>
the predominance of the interest of the many in the Anglo-American<lb/>
United States.  Instead of a bridle, thus authority serves as<lb/>
a cloak and a support to sinister interest on the part of the Judge.<lb/>
Under cover of that cloak he is enabled by these laws to <del><gap/><lb/>
works <add><gap/></add> <gap/></del> give effect to injustice in <del>wher</del> many a <unclear>cause</unclear> in<lb/>
which he would not have ventured <del>to</del> so to do with his own<lb/>
hands.  As to the sinister interest by which <unclear>we</unclear> in that situation<lb/>
have always been governed it has been here brought to view already<lb/>
<del>that it <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> been sufferable as:</del> it has been<lb/>
seen that in the most important classes of causes so sure as<lb/>
his advice is pursued so here is the greatest happiness of the<lb/>
greatest number lessened.  But so <del>decided</del> <add>by the <gap/> and <unclear>pens</unclear> of all lawyers</add> immoral and so <gap/><lb/>
has hitherto been as it <del><gap/></del> <gap/> can <gap/> to be the <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
<del>on the opposite side</del> <add>given</add> of appropriate aptitude in all its <gap/> as<lb/>
essentially attached to that intention, <add>in the case of such Jurymen</add> that no experience or<lb/>
observation which it has been in their way to make of the<lb/>
instances of the opposite inaptitude – has yet sufficed to <gap/> <add>clear<lb/>
the minds of</add> <unclear>thus</unclear> form to deep rooted a prejudice.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:05, 16 January 2025

Click Here To Edit

1823 Sept. 6
Constitutional

Of its general inaptitude, the notion whatever favourable conception
has place is founded it will be seen an illusion. Of this illusion an effect
is – the causing it the institution to be regarded as adequate to its more principally
intended purpose – namely serving as a bridle to the
power of the Judge. That in this character it has some effect
is altogether above dispute: but that the witness what difference
there is between the English mitigated and the Continental unmitigated
despotism. But that this effect is widely short of adequate
but too : witness the difference between
the sacrifice made of the interest of the many in England, and
the predominance of the interest of the many in the Anglo-American
United States. Instead of a bridle, thus authority serves as
a cloak and a support to sinister interest on the part of the Judge.
Under cover of that cloak he is enabled by these laws to
works
give effect to injustice in wher many a cause in
which he would not have ventured to so to do with his own
hands. As to the sinister interest by which we in that situation
have always been governed it has been here brought to view already
that it been sufferable as: it has been
seen that in the most important classes of causes so sure as
his advice is pursued so here is the greatest happiness of the
greatest number lessened. But so decided by the and pens of all lawyers immoral and so
has hitherto been as it can to be the
on the opposite side given of appropriate aptitude in all its as
essentially attached to that intention, in the case of such Jurymen that no experience or
observation which it has been in their way to make of the
instances of the opposite inaptitude – has yet sufficed to clear
the minds of
thus form to deep rooted a prejudice.


Identifier: | JB/034/157/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-09-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

93-94

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

157

Info in main headings field

constitut.

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4 / d30 / f30

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

10431

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in