JB/042/259/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/259/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1826. Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. 27 ++<lb/>
Constitutional Code</head>
 
<note>Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively<lb/>
&sect;.5. Number in a Judicatory</note>
 
<p>4</p>
 
<note>9<lb/>
Art. 9. 7. Only by a<lb/>
<del>still more <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/>
still more productive<lb/>
cause <del><gap/></del> official fees<lb/>
and law-taxes is<lb/>
the <add>cause of</add> delay and denial<lb/>
of justice <unclear>secured</unclear> from<lb/>
general notice.</note>
 
<p>Ratiocinative continued<lb/>
1<lb/>
You make a defalcation of one from the total number of<lb/>
judicatories, and thereby <del>make</del> a proportionable addition<lb/>
to the length of journeys <del><gap/></del> and demurrage in the instance<lb/>
of at least one judicatory; and <del>produce</del> <add>to</add> a correspondent<lb/>
amount <add>you</add> produce denial of justice, together with <sic>encrease</sic> of<lb/>
delay vexation and <sic>expence</sic>, as above. But, for <del><gap/></del><lb/>
<unclear>whatever</unclear> reason you <del>should add <gap/> <gap/></del> make <del>an</del> <add>such</add> addition<lb/>
of one Judge in any one Judicatory, for the same<lb/>
reason should you make that same addition in every other<lb/>
Judicatory. <del><gap/></del> <add>Place</add> then in each Judicatory <add>instead of one Judge</add> two Judges,<lb/>
you reduce the total number of judicatories to 300 instead<lb/>
of <del><gap/></del> 600 &#x2014; the number requisite to prevent denial<lb/>
of justice: place in each Judicatory three Judges, you reduce<lb/>
it to 200 and so on: producing, by every <del>Judge the addi</del><lb/>
such addition made to the number of Judges in each Judicatory<lb/>
a correspondent <del><gap/></del> unavoidable addition to denial<lb/>
of justice, together with <add>still greater addition to</add> delay, vexation and <sic>expence</sic>.</p>
 
<note>10<lb/>
Art. 10. 8. By protracted<lb/>
opposition or pretended<lb/>
doubts a dishonest<lb/>
Judge may injure<lb/>
a <unclear>person</unclear> by delay,<lb/>
to any extent: not<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <add>diminishing</add> his own reputation,<lb/>
but <sic>encreasing</sic> it<lb/>
by the appearance of<lb/>
anxiety to do justice.</note>
 
<p>3<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Ratiocinative</hi>.<lb/>
Art. 10. 8. If, of two Judges either has, by means<lb/>
of corruption, or sympathy or antipathy towards this or<lb/>
that individual or sinister interest which is promoted<lb/>
by delay, &#x2014; he has it in his power &#x2014; not only to produce<lb/>
it to an indefinite extent, but to produce it<lb/>
without scandal by pretending doubts; and, while in<lb/>
this way promoting the sinister interest, <del>to acquire</del> he<lb/>
may be acquiring the reputation of <del>extraordinary</del> <unclear>prætio</unclear>-ordinary<lb/>
moral aptitude, on the score of <unclear>prætio</unclear>-anxiety<lb/>
to judge aright.</p>
 
<p>2 Ratiocinative. Instructional<lb/>
Art. 9. <del>Art. 6</del> 7. Only by a still more abundantly productive<lb/>
<unclear>cause</unclear>, namely law taxes and law fees official and professional,<lb/>
are <del>the</del> <add>these</add> effects of supernumerariness of Judges in the<lb/>
production of denial of justice together with aggravation of delay<lb/>
vexation and <sic>expence</sic>, <del>kept out of</del> concealed from general observation.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:41, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1826. Decr. 27 ++
Constitutional Code

Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
§.5. Number in a Judicatory

4

9
Art. 9. 7. Only by a
still more
still more productive
cause official fees
and law-taxes is
the cause of delay and denial
of justice secured from
general notice.

Ratiocinative continued
1
You make a defalcation of one from the total number of
judicatories, and thereby make a proportionable addition
to the length of journeys and demurrage in the instance
of at least one judicatory; and produce to a correspondent
amount you produce denial of justice, together with encrease of
delay vexation and expence, as above. But, for
whatever reason you should add make an such addition
of one Judge in any one Judicatory, for the same
reason should you make that same addition in every other
Judicatory. Place then in each Judicatory instead of one Judge two Judges,
you reduce the total number of judicatories to 300 instead
of 600 — the number requisite to prevent denial
of justice: place in each Judicatory three Judges, you reduce
it to 200 and so on: producing, by every Judge the addi
such addition made to the number of Judges in each Judicatory
a correspondent unavoidable addition to denial
of justice, together with still greater addition to delay, vexation and expence.

10
Art. 10. 8. By protracted
opposition or pretended
doubts a dishonest
Judge may injure
a person by delay,
to any extent: not
diminishing his own reputation,
but encreasing it
by the appearance of
anxiety to do justice.

3
Ratiocinative.
Art. 10. 8. If, of two Judges either has, by means
of corruption, or sympathy or antipathy towards this or
that individual or sinister interest which is promoted
by delay, — he has it in his power — not only to produce
it to an indefinite extent, but to produce it
without scandal by pretending doubts; and, while in
this way promoting the sinister interest, to acquire he
may be acquiring the reputation of extraordinary prætio-ordinary
moral aptitude, on the score of prætio-anxiety
to judge aright.

2 Ratiocinative. Instructional
Art. 9. Art. 6 7. Only by a still more abundantly productive
cause, namely law taxes and law fees official and professional,
are the these effects of supernumerariness of Judges in the
production of denial of justice together with aggravation of delay
vexation and expence, kept out of concealed from general observation.




Identifier: | JB/042/259/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1826-12-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

9-10

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

259

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

ratiocinative continued / ratiocinative instructional

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1826

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1826

Notes public

ID Number

13182

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in