JB/042/398/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/398/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1825. <del>May</del> Nov. 4<lb/>
Procedure Code.</head>
 
<note>++<lb/>
Cop<hi rend="superscript">d</hi><lb/>
1 5</note>
 
<note>1<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> &amp; 2<hi rend="superscript">o</hi><lb/>
Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively<lb/>
<del>&sect;. <gap/><gap/></del><lb/>
&sect;.21. Contested interpretation<lb/>
<del>&sect;. <gap/><gap/><lb/>
<gap/></del> reporting.</note>
 
<!-- The following 4 paras (heading and Art. 1 to Art. 3) are deleted -->
<p>&sect;.41. Uniformity of <gap/> secured</p>
 
<p>Art. 1. Periodically, to wit on the last day of every<lb/>
month, <add>in every Immediate Judicatory</add> under the direction of the Judge the Registrar will have<lb/>
drawn up a <add>tabular</add> statement of the several articles <del><gap/><gap/></del> in the several<lb/>
Codes in which <add>the import of</add> after contestation a decision <gap/> <gap/> that same<lb/>
judicatory been grounds.</p>
 
<p>Art. 2. To each such article the Judge will at the<lb/>
same time have attached his signature denoting either that<lb/>
in his judgment for giving description to the import of the law<lb/>
no amendment would be useful, or that an amendment to a<lb/>
certain purport would be useful subjoining accordingly the<lb/>
tenor of such proposed amendment</p>
 
<p>Art. 3. Call the Table, the Judicial interpretation<lb/>
<del>Table</del> <add>or Calendar</add> <del>or <gap/> for shortness the Interpretation Table or Calendar.</del></p>
 
<p>Art. 10. Of a contested interpretation Report<lb/>
<del>Art. 10. Of this Table <add>Report</add></del> exemplars will be thus disposed<lb/>
of</p>
 
<p>1. Transmitted to the Appellate Judicatory, one</p>
 
<p>2. Transmitted to the Justice Minister, one</p>
 
<p>3. Transmitted to the Legislation Minister, one</p>
 
<p>4. Kept in the Registry of the Immediate Judicatory, one</p>
 
<p>5. Delivered to each Applicant or set of Applicants <del>having</del> joining <note>in a separate interpretation<lb/>
paper, one</note></p>
 
<p>6. Delivered to the party or parties Respondent, one</p>
 
<p>7. Kept by the Judge in his <gap/> capacity, one</p>
 
<p><!-- This para is deleted -->Art. 11. In like <gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/> <add><gap/><gap/> Appellate Judicatory</add><lb/>
<gap/><gap/> Interpretation Table <gap/><gap/><gap/><lb/>
<gap/><gap/> that same Judicatory.</p>
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:42, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1825. May Nov. 4
Procedure Code.

++
Copd
1 5

1o & 2o
Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
§.
§.21. Contested interpretation
§.
reporting.

§.41. Uniformity of secured

Art. 1. Periodically, to wit on the last day of every
month, in every Immediate Judicatory under the direction of the Judge the Registrar will have
drawn up a tabular statement of the several articles in the several
Codes in which the import of after contestation a decision that same
judicatory been grounds.

Art. 2. To each such article the Judge will at the
same time have attached his signature denoting either that
in his judgment for giving description to the import of the law
no amendment would be useful, or that an amendment to a
certain purport would be useful subjoining accordingly the
tenor of such proposed amendment

Art. 3. Call the Table, the Judicial interpretation
Table or Calendar or for shortness the Interpretation Table or Calendar.

Art. 10. Of a contested interpretation Report
Art. 10. Of this Table Report exemplars will be thus disposed
of

1. Transmitted to the Appellate Judicatory, one

2. Transmitted to the Justice Minister, one

3. Transmitted to the Legislation Minister, one

4. Kept in the Registry of the Immediate Judicatory, one

5. Delivered to each Applicant or set of Applicants having joining in a separate interpretation
paper, one

6. Delivered to the party or parties Respondent, one

7. Kept by the Judge in his capacity, one

Art. 11. In like Appellate Judicatory
Interpretation Table
that same Judicatory.




Identifier: | JB/042/398/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1825-11-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

398

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / e5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

"copd"

ID Number

13321

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in