JB/042/406/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/406/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
—
'''[{{fullurl:JB/042/406/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/042/406/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1824. <del>May 18</del> July 15 +</p>
<head>Constitutional Code.</head>
<note>Ch.XII <add>Judiciary collectively</add><del>Ministers sev</del>erally<lb/>
S.17. <del><add>Meliorative <add>suggestive</add></add><add> Indicative</add></del> <gap/> <del>Legislative Minister</del><lb/>
Superseded by<lb/>
&sect; 20. Eventually emendative</note><lb/>
 
<p><del>Art. Effect produced on the code by the <gap/> proposed by<lb/>
the judiciary function</del></p>
 
<p>Art. In regard to calamity unaccompanied by delinquency <lb/>
fields <add>occasion</add> for the exercise of the function belonging to the Preventive <lb/>
Service Sub Department will comparatively be few and <lb/>
casual: and when they have place, <del>they will in gen</del> the persons<lb/>
for whose service they present a demand will more frequently<lb/>
be non-functionaries - individuals to whose will the calamity <lb/>
or the danger of it happens to present itself - their functionaries<lb/>
specially <del>changed</del> and constantly changed with the endeavour to <lb/>
ward off or instigate it.
&#x2014;</p>
<note>Art. Proposed by a<lb/>
Judge principal as above<lb/>
and not opposed as before<lb/>
an amendment in <gap/><lb/>
of the tacit <gap/><lb/>
of the Legislature become<lb/>
aggregated to the body of the<lb/>
law as if proposed by<lb/>
a Member and adopted</note><lb/>
<p>Art. <del>Effect of an amendment</del> Proposed by a Judiciary<lb/>
functionary, <del>the effect</del> <add>and not opposed in a manner hereinafter un<gap/></add> an amendment <add><del>in</del> virtue of the tacit</add> <del>becomes eventually</del><lb/>
<add>consent of the Legislature becomes <del>as</del> aggregated to the body</add>part and parcel of the law in the same manner<lb/>
as if <del>proposed by</del> on the proposition of a member it had <del>been</del><lb/>
<del>adopted</del> by a positive act <del>of the Legislature</del> been expressly<lb/>
adopted.</p>
<note>Art. Day on which such<lb/>
<add>aggregation</add><del><gap/> <gap/></del> has place<lb/>
<del>Art</del> In Ch.XII Ministers<lb/>
severally if 2. Legis<gap/>:<lb/>
Minister. Art. 17 see<lb/>
Amendment reception and<lb/>
Amendment considerative<lb/>
time: of that time the<lb/>
last day is the aggregation<lb/>
day.</note><lb/>
<p>Art. <add>Day in which such aggregation have place </add> In Ch:XI. Ministers severally &sect;.2.II. Legislation <lb/>
Minister Art.17 . mention is made of two portions of lines, one <add>named</add>by <lb/>
<del>the <gap/> of</del> Amendment receptive time, the other <del>by</del> Amendment<lb/>
consideration time, the last day of the Amendment consideration<lb/>
leave on the day on which <del>the</del> in the event above mentioned, the compart<lb/>
of the Legislature is to be understood to have been given to<lb/>
the amendment: and to the Legislation Minister it belongs to  aggregate<lb/>
it, in the same manner as a proposed ordinance formally adopted<lb/>
to the body</p>
<note>Incidents by any of<lb/>
which the aggregation is<lb/>
prevented<lb/>
1. Amendment by a Judge<lb/>
Immediate, disapproval <lb/>
by the Judge Appellate or<lb/>
Justice Minister<lb/>
2. Amendment by a Judge<lb/>
Appellate, disapproval<lb/>
by Justice Minister<lb/>
3. Motion made by any<lb/>
member and seconded<lb/>
by any other for the<lb/>rejection or consideration<lb/>
of it</note><lb/>
<p>Art. <add>Incidents</add> Events by any of which it is prevented from their<lb/>
becoming law are any of the following.</p>
<p>1. If for the adoption, rejection or modification of it <del><gap/></del> a motion<lb/>
being made by <del><gap/></del>  any number of the Legislators it is thereby<lb/>
<del>placed in the carpet</del> brought expressly under the consideration of the<lb/>
Legislature.</p>
<p>2. If, having been transmitted by the Judges principal of an Immediate<lb/>
Judiciary <del>it receives rather the time</del> a negative <add>from</add> <del>at the</del><lb/>
hands of the <add>Judge of the principal of the</add> c<gap/>bant Appellate Judicatory, or the Justices Minister,<lb/>
or the Legislation Minister is received within the abovementioned consideration time.|</p>
<p>3. If, having been transmitted by the Judge Principal of an Appellate<lb/>
Judicatory, a negation has been received as above from the Justice Minister or the Legislation Minister</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:42, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1824. May 18 July 15 +

Constitutional Code. Ch.XII Judiciary collectivelyMinisters severally
S.17. Meliorative <add>suggestive</add> Indicative Legislative Minister
Superseded by
§ 20. Eventually emendative

Art. Effect produced on the code by the proposed by
the judiciary function

Art. In regard to calamity unaccompanied by delinquency
fields occasion for the exercise of the function belonging to the Preventive
Service Sub Department will comparatively be few and
casual: and when they have place, they will in gen the persons
for whose service they present a demand will more frequently
be non-functionaries - individuals to whose will the calamity
or the danger of it happens to present itself - their functionaries
specially changed and constantly changed with the endeavour to
ward off or instigate it. —

Art. Proposed by a
Judge principal as above
and not opposed as before
an amendment in
of the tacit
of the Legislature become
aggregated to the body of the
law as if proposed by
a Member and adopted

Art. Effect of an amendment Proposed by a Judiciary
functionary, the effect and not opposed in a manner hereinafter un an amendment in virtue of the tacit becomes eventually
consent of the Legislature becomes as aggregated to the bodypart and parcel of the law in the same manner
as if proposed by on the proposition of a member it had been
adopted by a positive act of the Legislature been expressly
adopted.

Art. Day on which such
aggregation has place
Art In Ch.XII Ministers
severally if 2. Legis:
Minister. Art. 17 see
Amendment reception and
Amendment considerative
time: of that time the
last day is the aggregation
day.

Art. Day in which such aggregation have place In Ch:XI. Ministers severally §.2.II. Legislation
Minister Art.17 . mention is made of two portions of lines, one namedby
the of Amendment receptive time, the other by Amendment
consideration time, the last day of the Amendment consideration
leave on the day on which the in the event above mentioned, the compart
of the Legislature is to be understood to have been given to
the amendment: and to the Legislation Minister it belongs to aggregate
it, in the same manner as a proposed ordinance formally adopted
to the body

Incidents by any of
which the aggregation is
prevented
1. Amendment by a Judge
Immediate, disapproval
by the Judge Appellate or
Justice Minister
2. Amendment by a Judge
Appellate, disapproval
by Justice Minister
3. Motion made by any
member and seconded
by any other for the
rejection or consideration
of it

Art. Incidents Events by any of which it is prevented from their
becoming law are any of the following.

1. If for the adoption, rejection or modification of it a motion
being made by any number of the Legislators it is thereby
placed in the carpet brought expressly under the consideration of the
Legislature.

2. If, having been transmitted by the Judges principal of an Immediate
Judiciary it receives rather the time a negative from at the
hands of the Judge of the principal of the cbant Appellate Judicatory, or the Justices Minister,
or the Legislation Minister is received within the abovementioned consideration time.|

3. If, having been transmitted by the Judge Principal of an Appellate
Judicatory, a negation has been received as above from the Justice Minister or the Legislation Minister




Identifier: | JB/042/406/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1824-07-15

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

406

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

13329

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in