JB/051/225/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/051/225/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/225/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/225/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


<head>2</head><!-- aligned to the left-hand margin, and in pencil -->
<p><note>Accommodation  Appeal retrograde</note><!-- note in pencil -->  either in favour of the Plaintiff or the Defendant.]<!-- closing bracket in pencil -->
<lb/>
In the second place comes the District Court which
<lb/>
decides in favour of the Plaintiff or the defendant
<lb/>
and acts in conformity to the opinion given
<lb/>
by the Reconciliation-Office or in repugnance
<lb/>
to  it.  In the third place comes the Reconciliation-Office
<lb/>
again which is either the same with
<lb/>
the first Reconciliation-Office or a,
<add>quite</add> different one,
<lb/>
as it may happen: and then if they <add>the Gentlemen of this office</add> think proper
<lb/>
it climbs up to the Department Court,
<lb/>
from whence it has but two stages more to
<lb/>
travel. It would require the aid of mathematics
<lb/>
to make out all the variety of situations <add>deducible</add> resulting
<lb/>
from the multiplication of all these elements,
<lb/>
and a volume to discuss the effect
<lb/>
of the institution in every one.  Sometimes it
<lb/>
is the cause of the Defendant that the Reconciliation - whose - Board will hang heavy upon, but most
<lb/>
frequently the Complainant who stands <add>by the nature of things</add> principally
<lb/>
charged <del>by</del> with the burthen of all denials of justice
<lb/>
and delays.  Not to bewilder myself and the
<lb/>
reader beyond recovery  I will <add>at random</add> take <add>two</add>, but <add>&amp;</add> two out
<lb/>
of the inexhaustible <del>fr</del> fund of these cases.  The
<lb/>
Reconciliation-Office sits <add>sit</add> now in <sic>judgment</sic>
<lb/>
upon its own conduct <add>decision</add> and that of the District
<lb/>
Court which had been opposite to it.  Is it <add>be they</add> expected <add>to</add>
<lb/></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:55, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


2

Accommodation Appeal retrograde either in favour of the Plaintiff or the Defendant.]
In the second place comes the District Court which
decides in favour of the Plaintiff or the defendant
and acts in conformity to the opinion given
by the Reconciliation-Office or in repugnance
to it. In the third place comes the Reconciliation-Office
again which is either the same with
the first Reconciliation-Office or a, quite different one,
as it may happen: and then if they the Gentlemen of this office think proper
it climbs up to the Department Court,
from whence it has but two stages more to
travel. It would require the aid of mathematics
to make out all the variety of situations deducible resulting
from the multiplication of all these elements,
and a volume to discuss the effect
of the institution in every one. Sometimes it
is the cause of the Defendant that the Reconciliation - whose - Board will hang heavy upon, but most
frequently the Complainant who stands by the nature of things principally
charged by with the burthen of all denials of justice
and delays. Not to bewilder myself and the
reader beyond recovery I will at random take two, but & two out
of the inexhaustible fr fund of these cases. The
Reconciliation-Office sits sit now in judgment
upon its own conduct decision and that of the District
Court which had been opposite to it. Is it be they expected to



Identifier: | JB/051/225/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

225

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / d2 / d3 / d4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::floyd & co [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur young

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16390

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in