JB/081/375/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/081/375/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1829 May 28<lb/>Petitions</head> <!-- numbers in pencil --> <p>4<lb/><note>Supplement</note><lb/>1 <note>&sect;. II Elucidation<lb/>French procedure</note></p> <p>II. <del>Proc</del> Judiciary Establishment</p>  <!-- marginal summary in pencil --> <p><note>17<lb/>II Judiciary<lb/>1. Numbers in a Judicatory</note></p> <p>17. II Judiciary Establishment:  Topic the first Number<lb/>in a Judicatory.  That in addition to one, <add>any and</add> every other Judge is<lb/>a nuisance <del>has</del> <add>this or nothing has already been</add> been demonstrated.  But if so, what a<lb/><unclear>swap</unclear> would it be to be made (full compensation to <add>all</add> individuals<lb/>supposed of course) in the Judiciary of France.  And to what a<lb/>degree, still after vast survey made, might not the number of<lb/><del>Justic</del> Judicial territories, <del><gap/></del> thence the smallest of cases<lb/>thence again the facility of access given to <hi rend="underline">justicables</hi> be <sic>encreased</sic>:<lb/>the principle of omnicompetence and <add>that</add> of intercommunity<lb/>of jurisdiction still preserved?</p>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:56, 12 December 2023

Click Here To Edit

1829 May 28
Petitions

4
Supplement
1 §. II Elucidation
French procedure

II. Proc Judiciary Establishment

17
II Judiciary
1. Numbers in a Judicatory

17. II Judiciary Establishment: Topic the first Number
in a Judicatory. That in addition to one, any and every other Judge is
a nuisance has this or nothing has already been been demonstrated. But if so, what a
swap would it be to be made (full compensation to all individuals
supposed of course) in the Judiciary of France. And to what a
degree, still after vast survey made, might not the number of
Justic Judicial territories, thence the smallest of cases
thence again the facility of access given to justicables be encreased:
the principle of omnicompetence and that of intercommunity
of jurisdiction still preserved?



Identifier: | JB/081/375/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-05-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

17

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

375

Info in main headings field

petitions

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d4 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1828

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

26162

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in