JB/051/383/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/051/383/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/383/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/383/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil --><head>Judicial Estab.<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
Judges – Number</head></p>
 
<p>7.  Numbers are not less unfavourable to<lb/>
 
skill and intelligence, in as far as these <del>pro</del><lb/>
 
qualities are the fruit of industry.  True it is<lb/>
intelligence is not so exclusively the fruit of<lb/>
industry, but that diversity of <del>intellige</del> intellect<lb/>
may augment the stock of it.  Though in two<lb/>
Judges you will not get a measure of intelligence<lb/>
double to what you would have got in one<lb/>
yet you may get something more; and so for <add>with regard to</add><lb/>
any greater number.  But whatever benefit <add>advantage<lb/>
assistance</add> may be derivable from this source will<lb/>
not begin to tell as of any efficacy untill<lb/>
that which may be expected from <add>the</add> Advocate<lb/>
on both sides and that which may be expected<lb/>
from the right of appeal repeated as often as<lb/>
shall be thought necessary are both exhausted.<lb/>
But from a man in the station of an advocate<lb/>
much more exertion from very obvious<lb/>
causes may be expected and thence much more<lb/>
intelligence than from the same man in the<lb/>
capacity of a Judge, much more than in the<lb/>
capacity of one of a multitude of Judges.<lb/>
In case of an appeal <add>of appeal</add> two <del><gap/></del> Judges each<lb/>
<add>sitting</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:36, 4 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

Judicial Estab.
Judges – Number

7. Numbers are not less unfavourable to
skill and intelligence, in as far as these pro
qualities are the fruit of industry. True it is
intelligence is not so exclusively the fruit of
industry, but that diversity of intellige intellect
may augment the stock of it. Though in two
Judges you will not get a measure of intelligence
double to what you would have got in one
yet you may get something more; and so for with regard to
any greater number. But whatever benefit advantage
assistance
may be derivable from this source will
not begin to tell as of any efficacy untill
that which may be expected from the Advocate
on both sides and that which may be expected
from the right of appeal repeated as often as
shall be thought necessary are both exhausted.
But from a man in the station of an advocate
much more exertion from very obvious
causes may be expected and thence much more
intelligence than from the same man in the
capacity of a Judge, much more than in the
capacity of one of a multitude of Judges.
In case of an appeal of appeal two Judges each
sitting


Identifier: | JB/051/383/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

14-19

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

383

Info in main headings field

judicial estab. judges number

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f19 / f20 / f21 / f22

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16548

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in