★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/390/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/051/390/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil --><head>Judicial Estab.<lb/> | |||
Judges</head></p> | |||
<p>If unity is best in <add>for</add> judicature, why not<lb/> | |||
<add>it may naturally be said</add> in legislation? – <del>The cases are very different</del> There<lb/> | |||
are a thousand <add>many</add> points of difference. I need <del><gap/></del><lb/> | |||
mark but a few of them and that with the<lb/> | |||
slightest touch. In the exercise of the judicial<lb/> | |||
authority eloquence is not necessary, <del>invention</del> <add>genius</add> would<lb/> | |||
be pernicious: in legislation both are necessary:<lb/> | |||
genius to invent <add>discover</add> what is best <del>and</del> eloquence to<lb/> | |||
procure its <add>recommend its</add> reception. Both require he united <add>associated</add><lb/> | |||
powers of many individuals.</p> | |||
<p>In so vast a country as France <add>number of those who share</add> the legislative<lb/> | |||
power <add>cannot</add> if they <add>partakers are to</add> members of it depend upon the<lb/> | |||
body of the people be very small. <del>The <del>central</del> districts</del><lb/> | |||
The fewer they <del>were</del> are the more easy it would<lb/> | |||
be for the executive power to <del>acquire</del> gain<lb/> | |||
an ascendant over them by corrupt influence:<lb/> | |||
while the largeness of the electoral districts would<lb/> | |||
render the business of election embarassing, and<lb/> | |||
by <del>rendering the effect</del> reducing to insignificance<lb/> | |||
the value of a vote diminish the authority of<lb/> | |||
the Electors over their Deputies, which by encreasing<lb/> | |||
the value of a seat it would render <add>expose</add> the <add>election</add> contest to <unclear>tumults</unclear></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
Judicial Estab.
Judges
If unity is best in for judicature, why not
it may naturally be said in legislation? – The cases are very different There
are a thousand many points of difference. I need
mark but a few of them and that with the
slightest touch. In the exercise of the judicial
authority eloquence is not necessary, invention genius would
be pernicious: in legislation both are necessary:
genius to invent discover what is best and eloquence to
procure its recommend its reception. Both require he united associated
powers of many individuals.
In so vast a country as France number of those who share the legislative
power cannot if they partakers are to members of it depend upon the
body of the people be very small. The central districts
The fewer they were are the more easy it would
be for the executive power to acquire gain
an ascendant over them by corrupt influence:
while the largeness of the electoral districts would
render the business of election embarassing, and
by rendering the effect reducing to insignificance
the value of a vote diminish the authority of
the Electors over their Deputies, which by encreasing
the value of a seat it would render expose the election contest to tumults
|
Identifier: | JB/051/390/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
33, 32-33, 34? |
|||
|
051 |
evidence; procedure code |
||
|
390 |
judicial estab. judges |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
2 |
||
|
recto |
f39 / f40 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
|
16555 |
|||
