★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/220/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/106/220/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1807</p> | |||
<p>The leaving the door of eligibility <add>capacity of being elected</add> open to Commoners<lb/> | |||
is an article that was inserted <add><unclear>rather</unclear> </add>in deference to what<lb/> | |||
was supposed <add>conceived by the proposer</add> to be the bias of general <add>public</add> opinion, viz. among<lb/> | |||
Lords themselves, than in conformity to any individual<lb/> | |||
opinion of his own.<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> As to the unlimited latitude of choice left open for the <add>eventual</add> admission of <add><del>any such</del></add> Commoners: <del>at large</del> <add>viz. of such</add> in whose <del><gap/></del> existence presumptive <add>evidence of</add> superior aptitude for this superior judicial status may have been <del><gap/></del> <add>afforded</add> by ability displayed in a subordinate rank of judicature or in professional practice.</note> Were the right of election in any<lb/> | |||
other hands than those of the Lords themselves, <del>it</del> <add>such an admission</add> would<lb/> | |||
indeed be a most serious <gap/> of their privileges: but<lb/> | |||
that right being in their <add>own</add> hands, and theirs alone, the consequence is – that by the <unclear>enlargement</unclear> of the field of choice<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/> power</del> <add>the power of the House,</add> so far from being <gap/> upon <del>is</del> <add>would be</add> enlarged.</p> | |||
<p>The known principle of human nature – the human<lb/> | |||
<unclear>proprietary</unclear> naturally <del>and</del> inherent in all corporate bodies, would<lb/> | |||
surely be sufficient to secure to <add>a preference in favour of</add> fellow members of the aristocracy,<lb/> | |||
under equal degrees of presumable aptitude. But<lb/> | |||
where the right of choosing <add>election</add> is preserved in the proper hands,<lb/> | |||
the security thus afforded, <del>admitts <add>does away</add></del> is universally understood<lb/> | |||
to do away the necessity of <del>choosing the</del> looking exclusively<lb/> | |||
to the same class for the objects of device. <del>The object<lb/> | |||
to be deemed</del> In the case of an elected <add>a deputed</add> body its perfection consists<lb/> | |||
in being the perfect organ of the will <add>in mind the most perfect image and copy</add> of the <del>representative</del> | |||
deputing body <add>body</add>: but to do <add>pursue</add> the will of the deputing body it is<lb/> | |||
not necessary for the members of the deputed body to be members<lb/> | |||
of it. <del>The Kings</del> Doing or not doing the will of the King, the<lb/> | |||
King's Delegates are not Kings: it is as little necessary that<lb/> | |||
the Lord's Delegates should be Lords.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
Decr 1807
The leaving the door of eligibility capacity of being elected open to Commoners
is an article that was inserted rather in deference to what
was supposed conceived by the proposer to be the bias of general public opinion, viz. among
Lords themselves, than in conformity to any individual
opinion of his own.⊞ ⊞ As to the unlimited latitude of choice left open for the eventual admission of any such Commoners: at large viz. of such in whose existence presumptive evidence of superior aptitude for this superior judicial status may have been afforded by ability displayed in a subordinate rank of judicature or in professional practice. Were the right of election in any
other hands than those of the Lords themselves, it such an admission would
indeed be a most serious of their privileges: but
that right being in their own hands, and theirs alone, the consequence is – that by the enlargement of the field of choice
power the power of the House, so far from being upon is would be enlarged.
The known principle of human nature – the human
proprietary naturally and inherent in all corporate bodies, would
surely be sufficient to secure to a preference in favour of fellow members of the aristocracy,
under equal degrees of presumable aptitude. But
where the right of choosing election is preserved in the proper hands,
the security thus afforded, admitts does away is universally understood
to do away the necessity of choosing the looking exclusively
to the same class for the objects of device. The object
to be deemed In the case of an elected a deputed body its perfection consists
in being the perfect organ of the will in mind the most perfect image and copy of the representative
deputing body body: but to do pursue the will of the deputing body it is
not necessary for the members of the deputed body to be members
of it. The Kings Doing or not doing the will of the King, the
King's Delegates are not Kings: it is as little necessary that
the Lord's Delegates should be Lords.
Identifier: | JB/106/220/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1807-12 |
|||
106 |
scotch reform |
||
220 |
judicial |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e2 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
34808 |
|||