★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/237/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/106/237/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>14 Feb<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> 1814</p> | |||
<p><head>Ch. XII. Consequences<lb/> | |||
§.1. Shapes in which<lb/> | |||
the mischief of an act<lb/> | |||
may shew itself.</head></p> | |||
<p>1. Recapitulation – 149</p> | |||
<p>2. Mischief of an act, the<lb/> | |||
aggregate of its mischievous<lb/> | |||
consequences. 149</p> | |||
<p>3. The mischief of an act<lb/> | |||
primary or secondary. 149.</p> | |||
<p>4. Primary – originator<lb/> | |||
derivative. – 150</p> | |||
<p>5. The secondary – 1. Alarms<lb/> | |||
or 2. Danger. – 150</p> | |||
<p>6. Example – 150</p> | |||
<p>7. The danger whence it<lb/> | |||
arises – a past offence<lb/> | |||
affords no direct motive<lb/> | |||
to a future. 151</p> | |||
<p>8. But it suggests feasibility,<lb/> | |||
and weakens the<lb/> | |||
force of restraining motives – 152</p> | |||
<p>9. viz 1. Those issuing from<lb/> | |||
the political sanction 152</p> | |||
<p>10. 2. Those issuing from<lb/> | |||
the moral – 153.</p> | |||
<p>11. It is said to operate by<lb/> | |||
the influence of example. 153</p> | |||
<p>12. The alarm and the<lb/> | |||
danger though connected<lb/> | |||
are distinguishable. 154</p> | |||
<p>13. The primary consequences<lb/> | |||
of an act may be mischievous,<lb/> | |||
and the secondary<lb/> | |||
beneficial – 154</p> | |||
<p>14. Analysis of the different<lb/> | |||
shape in which the mischief<lb/> | |||
of an act may shew itself. 154</p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<p><head>Ch. XII. Consequence.</head></p> | |||
<p>15. – applied to the preceding<lb/> | |||
cases. 156</p> | |||
<p>16. – to examples of other<lb/> | |||
cases where the mischief<lb/> | |||
is less conspicuous. 156</p> | |||
<p>17. Example I. An act of<lb/> | |||
self-intoxication – 156</p> | |||
<p>18. Example II. Non payment<lb/> | |||
of a tax – 157</p> | |||
<p>19. No alarm, when no<lb/> | |||
assignable person is the<lb/> | |||
object. – 159.</p> | |||
<p><head>§. 2.</head></p> | |||
<p>20. Secondary mischief<lb/> | |||
influenced by the state of<lb/> | |||
the agents mind. 160</p> | |||
<p>21. Case 1. Involuntariness – 160.</p> | |||
<p>22. Case 2. Unintentionality<lb/> | |||
with heedlessness – 161</p> | |||
<p>23. Case 3. Missupposal<lb/> | |||
of a complete justification<lb/> | |||
without rashness – 161</p> | |||
<add>24. Case 4. Missupposal<lb/> | |||
of a partial justification<lb/> | |||
with rashness. 161</add> | |||
<p>25. Case 5. Missupposal<lb/> | |||
with rashness. – 162</p> | |||
<p>26. Case 6. Consequences<lb/> | |||
completely intentional<lb/> | |||
and free from missupposal.</p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<p>27. The nature of a motive<lb/> | |||
takes not away the<lb/> | |||
mischief of the secondary<lb/> | |||
consequences. – 162.</p> | |||
<p>28. Nor the beneficialness. 163</p> | |||
<p>29. But it may aggravate<lb/> | |||
the mischievousness where<lb/> | |||
they are mischievous. 163</p> | |||
<p>30. But not the most in<lb/> | |||
the case of the worst motives. – 163.</p> | |||
<p>31. It does the more, the<lb/> | |||
more considerable the<lb/> | |||
tendency of the motive<lb/> | |||
to produce such acts. 163</p> | |||
<p>32. Which is as its<lb/> | |||
strength and constancy. 164</p> | |||
<p>33. General efficacy of<lb/> | |||
a species of motive, how<lb/> | |||
measured. – 164</p> | |||
<p>34. A mischievous act<lb/> | |||
is more so, when issuing<lb/> | |||
from a self-regarding<lb/> | |||
than when from a dissocial<lb/> | |||
motive. 164</p> | |||
<p>35. º so even when issuing<lb/> | |||
from the motive of<lb/> | |||
religion. – 165</p> | |||
<p>36. Now the secondary<lb/> | |||
mischief is influenced<lb/> | |||
by <hi rend="underline">disposition</hi>. 165</p> | |||
<p>37. Connection of this<lb/> | |||
with the succeeding chapter – 165</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
14 Feby. 1814
Ch. XII. Consequences
§.1. Shapes in which
the mischief of an act
may shew itself.
1. Recapitulation – 149
2. Mischief of an act, the
aggregate of its mischievous
consequences. 149
3. The mischief of an act
primary or secondary. 149.
4. Primary – originator
derivative. – 150
5. The secondary – 1. Alarms
or 2. Danger. – 150
6. Example – 150
7. The danger whence it
arises – a past offence
affords no direct motive
to a future. 151
8. But it suggests feasibility,
and weakens the
force of restraining motives – 152
9. viz 1. Those issuing from
the political sanction 152
10. 2. Those issuing from
the moral – 153.
11. It is said to operate by
the influence of example. 153
12. The alarm and the
danger though connected
are distinguishable. 154
13. The primary consequences
of an act may be mischievous,
and the secondary
beneficial – 154
14. Analysis of the different
shape in which the mischief
of an act may shew itself. 154
---page break---
Ch. XII. Consequence.
15. – applied to the preceding
cases. 156
16. – to examples of other
cases where the mischief
is less conspicuous. 156
17. Example I. An act of
self-intoxication – 156
18. Example II. Non payment
of a tax – 157
19. No alarm, when no
assignable person is the
object. – 159.
§. 2.
20. Secondary mischief
influenced by the state of
the agents mind. 160
21. Case 1. Involuntariness – 160.
22. Case 2. Unintentionality
with heedlessness – 161
23. Case 3. Missupposal
of a complete justification
without rashness – 161
24. Case 4. Missupposal
of a partial justification
with rashness. 161
25. Case 5. Missupposal
with rashness. – 162
26. Case 6. Consequences
completely intentional
and free from missupposal.
---page break---
27. The nature of a motive
takes not away the
mischief of the secondary
consequences. – 162.
28. Nor the beneficialness. 163
29. But it may aggravate
the mischievousness where
they are mischievous. 163
30. But not the most in
the case of the worst motives. – 163.
31. It does the more, the
more considerable the
tendency of the motive
to produce such acts. 163
32. Which is as its
strength and constancy. 164
33. General efficacy of
a species of motive, how
measured. – 164
34. A mischievous act
is more so, when issuing
from a self-regarding
than when from a dissocial
motive. 164
35. º so even when issuing
from the motive of
religion. – 165
36. Now the secondary
mischief is influenced
by disposition. 165
37. Connection of this
with the succeeding chapter – 165
Identifier: | JB/106/237/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1814-02-11 |
|||
106 |
introduction to the principles of morals and legislation |
||
237 |
|||
003 |
ch. x motives / ch. xi dispositions / ch. xii consequences |
||
plan |
2 |
||
recto |
|||
ipml1 |
john dickinson & co 1809 |
||
a. levy |
|||
1809 |
|||
34825 |
|||