JB/051/414/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/051/414/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Evidence</head>
 
<note>Note</note>


<note>Leading and discrediting<lb/><del>17</del><lb/>Discrediting may<lb/><gap/> two different<lb/> effects corresponding<lb/>to the different endeavours:<lb/> 1. <gap/><lb/>and destroying it.</note>
<p>Under the term <hi rend="underline">discrediting</hi> may be included two<lb/>perfectly different operations or rather endeavours, proceeding<lb/>from two different opinions or views <del>respecting</del> <add>with regard to</add> the veracity<lb/>of the witness. In many cases the object will be only<lb/>to shame back into the path of truth a witness whom<lb/> you think you see <add>deviating or</add> <del>either</del> disposed to deviate from it.</p>
<p>In some the object may be to <sic>shew</sic> to the audience<lb/>that he has already deviated from <add>that path</add> <del>it</del>, and that so<lb/> grossly, as to have placed himself out of reach of repentance <add>correction</add><lb/>and to have forfeited all title to be believed, as far as<lb/>the credit of what he has said is affected by his<lb/>disposition to <del>violate</del> <add>depart from <del>it</del></add> it to your prejudice.</p>
<p>The former <add>of those two endeavours</add> will naturally be the primary <add>one:</add> <del>endeavour:</del><lb/><del>as</del> <add>since</add> it is better for you that <del>he</del> <add>your witness</add> should say something that<lb/>is to your advantage than that he should say nothing<lb/>but what is to your disadvantage, even though <add>in the latter case</add> you should<lb/>succeed in getting him to be disbelieved.</p>
<p>As the former is <del>the</del> more commonly the <del>first</del> primary<lb/> endeavour, so <del>it</del> is <del>it</del> probably the case which it supposes<lb/>and hopes for, the more common case: the opinion<lb/>which is the more favourable one to human nature seems<lb/>in this instance the more just.</p>
<note>18<lb/> In the 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> case the<lb/>interrogating ought<lb/>rather to be...</note>
<p>In the first case to speak explicitly and correctly<lb/>instead of saying <del><gap/></del> or attempting to descre-<lb/><add>dit</add></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:55, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Evidence Note

Leading and discrediting
17
Discrediting may
two different
effects corresponding
to the different endeavours:
1.
and destroying it.

Under the term discrediting may be included two
perfectly different operations or rather endeavours, proceeding
from two different opinions or views respecting with regard to the veracity
of the witness. In many cases the object will be only
to shame back into the path of truth a witness whom
you think you see deviating or either disposed to deviate from it.

In some the object may be to shew to the audience
that he has already deviated from that path it, and that so
grossly, as to have placed himself out of reach of repentance correction
and to have forfeited all title to be believed, as far as
the credit of what he has said is affected by his
disposition to violate depart from it it to your prejudice.

The former of those two endeavours will naturally be the primary one: endeavour:
as since it is better for you that he your witness should say something that
is to your advantage than that he should say nothing
but what is to your disadvantage, even though in the latter case you should
succeed in getting him to be disbelieved.

As the former is the more commonly the first primary
endeavour, so it is it probably the case which it supposes
and hopes for, the more common case: the opinion
which is the more favourable one to human nature seems
in this instance the more just.

18
In the 1st case the
interrogating ought
rather to be...

In the first case to speak explicitly and correctly
instead of saying or attempting to descre-
dit



Identifier: | JB/051/414/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

18-19

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

414

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f33 / f34

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16579

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in