JB/119/075/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/119/075/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/119/075/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/119/075/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>Another objection confines itself to the plan<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
of double Cells.  Put two together, it has been<lb/>
 
said to me, you weaken <add>your inspective power</add> the force of the inspection<lb/>
 
principle:  upon concert between them one<lb/>
 
of them may eclipse and screen the other.</p>
<p>The objection was ingenious:  the answer<lb/>
is compleat.  For one body to eclipse another<lb/>
with reference to a third, the three must be in<lb/>
the same right line:  bend the line ever so little,<lb/>
there is an end of your eclipse.  The objection<lb/>
supposes the prisoners to know at what point<lb/>
the Inspector will be <add><unclear>occupy</unclear></add> of his <gap/> at every given<lb/>
instant, which is impossible.  If they did, what<lb/>
purpose would it answer? <del>the ec</del> their eclipse<lb/>
would be a regular dance in which the Inspector's<lb/>
motions would be <add>simultaneously</add> reflected or rather anticipated<lb/>
by theirs.  Their motions would still be<lb/>
governed by his:  and <add>their project transparent:  and</add> what end could this answer<lb/>
<del>to them but that of</del> <add>what could it amount to but</add> a dance?  The Eclipse<lb/>
would be like that <add><gap/></add> in the Rehearsal:  and the<lb/>
author of it would make no better a wall than<lb/>
in does to Pyramus and<lb/>
Thisbe.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:48, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

Another objection confines itself to the plan
of double Cells. Put two together, it has been
said to me, you weaken your inspective power the force of the inspection
principle: upon concert between them one
of them may eclipse and screen the other.

The objection was ingenious: the answer
is compleat. For one body to eclipse another
with reference to a third, the three must be in
the same right line: bend the line ever so little,
there is an end of your eclipse. The objection
supposes the prisoners to know at what point
the Inspector will be occupy of his at every given
instant, which is impossible. If they did, what
purpose would it answer? the ec their eclipse
would be a regular dance in which the Inspector's
motions would be simultaneously reflected or rather anticipated
by theirs. Their motions would still be
governed by his: and their project transparent: and what end could this answer
to them but that of what could it amount to but a dance? The Eclipse
would be like that in the Rehearsal: and the
author of it would make no better a wall than
in does to Pyramus and
Thisbe.


Identifier: | JB/119/075/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 119.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

119

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

075

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

39586

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in