JB/121/188/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/121/188/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/188/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/188/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->24 Feb<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1802<lb/><head>Suppressors</head></p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>But supposing the declaration of my <add>eventual</add> determination<lb/>
 
to relinquish the undertaking had been equally explicit<lb/>
 
in the case where I speak of allowance for maintenance<lb/>
 
as, without the qualifying clause in brackets<lb/>
it would have been, in the case where I speak of<lb/>
the allowance for building, <add>the effect of</add> the suppression of the<lb/>
Letters constituting the Appendix to my Memorial<lb/>
would be presently the same in that case <add>instance</add>, as the<lb/>
that of the <del><gap/></del> assumed forgery in the other case,<lb/>
or, as <del>if</del> it would have been (to put the case of<lb/>
a different modification of forgery) if <add>for the purpose</add> by way of<lb/>
rendering the supposition of such determination of<lb/>
relinquishment on my part the more plain the<lb/>
words instead of being erased out of the instrument<lb/>
had been inserted into it insertion had been employed<lb/>
instead of obliteration:  for instance by adding<lb/>
at the end – "<hi rend="underline">it will be impossible for him</hi>"<lb/>
<del>Your</del> (the Memorialist) "<hi rend="underline">to perform the undertaking</hi>" ...<lb/>
"<hi rend="underline">without</hi>" such "<hi rend="underline">an increase</hi>".</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:22, 28 January 2022

'Click Here To Edit

24 Feby 1802
Suppressors

But supposing the declaration of my eventual determination
to relinquish the undertaking had been equally explicit
in the case where I speak of allowance for maintenance
as, without the qualifying clause in brackets
it would have been, in the case where I speak of
the allowance for building, the effect of the suppression of the
Letters constituting the Appendix to my Memorial
would be presently the same in that case instance, as the
that of the assumed forgery in the other case,
or, as if it would have been (to put the case of
a different modification of forgery) if for the purpose by way of
rendering the supposition of such determination of
relinquishment on my part the more plain the
words instead of being erased out of the instrument
had been inserted into it insertion had been employed
instead of obliteration: for instance by adding
at the end – "it will be impossible for him"
Your (the Memorialist) "to perform the undertaking" ...
"without" such "an increase".


Identifier: | JB/121/188/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-02-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

5

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

188

Info in main headings field

Suppression

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D5

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in