JB/122/424/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/424/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- header in pencil -->
 
<p>8 May<lb/><sic>Panopt.</sic> Compensation Claim <note>III Contract<lb/>&sect;&sect;.8</note><lb/>(2) <note>Cowie's case</note></p> <p><del>Upon the evidence given upon this score</del></p> <p>On the occasion of <del>t</del> an application to Parliament<lb/>for compensation for this loss, by the evidence <del>given</del> delivered<lb/>by <sic>Mess<hi rend="superscript">rs</hi></sic> Chalmers and Cowie <add>themselves</add> supported by proper<lb/>Vouchers a loss was stated, and on grounds which<lb/>upon the face of them <del>appeared</del> <add>appear</add> reasonable, of a loss actually<lb/>incurred to no less an amount than<lb/><del>£<gap/></del> £60,000.  <del>Notwithstanding this</del> The sum given <add>as above,</add> by<lb/>Parliament was <add> known (it has been seen)</add> no more than £25,000.  <add><del>as above</del></add> The principle<lb/>being admitted, viz. that Administration <del>by its acts</del> though<lb/>in that case without any the <del>smallest</del> <add>slightest</add> expectation on that score<lb/>having, after the encouragement so given, <del>with the</del> <add>including the expectation of the</add> necessarily<lb/>implied profit, <del>been having</del> by its own act <del>been the</del><lb/><del>cause of loss converted</del> <add>taken away</add> this profit <del>into loss</del> and even<lb/>converted it into loss, the suffering <del>party</del> <add>parties</add> had for their<lb/>indemnification a reasonable claim upon the justice<lb/>of Parliament &#x2014;  <del>When the</del> <add>this principle being admitted, whence <del>then</del></add> happened it <del>that the whole</del><lb/><add>then, (it may be asked) that the</add> compensation given was not equal to <del>what</del> <add>the whole of what, as above</add> was looked<lb/>upon as proved to be the <del>whole</del> amount of the loss? &#x2014; Through<lb/><del><gap/></del> the medium of a third person, I <del>received from</del> <add>obtained</add><lb/><del><gap/></del> <sic>t'other</sic> day from <add>one of the pursuers</add> (<sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> <hi rend="underline">Cowie</hi>) an <del>account</del><lb/>explanation, by which an answer was afforded <add>to this question</add>. <del>to that question</del><lb/>When the herrings came to London, had they been sold in London<lb/>£25,000 the Committee was satisfied would have<lb/>been the whole of the loss.  But, thinking to avoid <add>that loss</add> or<lb/>reduce the amount of <del>that loss</del> <add>it</add> the gentlemen in question<lb/><add>though <del>as appears by the Evidence</del> not without very ample advice</add> [+] <note>[+] (as <del>indeed <add><gap/></add></del> <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic><lb/>Cowie's evidence as<lb/>presented by <del>the</del> <add><unclear>Order</unclear></add> House<lb/>of Commons <sic>shews</sic>)</note><lb/>yet without the privity of Administration here, sent off the<lb/>whole of the cargoes to the West Indies <add>or</add> <del>and</del> other parts of<lb/>the world:  This I understand was, <add>in conversation with my friend</add> very frankly stated by<lb/><sic>Mr</sic> Cowie: nor in speaking of <del>what had</del> the sum which in that<lb/>consideration had been struck off from his demand did he appear to <!-- continues into margin --> express any such feeling as<lb/>that of <add>a</add> sense of injustice.</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:01, 15 March 2021

'Click Here To Edit

8 May
Panopt. Compensation Claim III Contract
§§.8

(2) Cowie's case

Upon the evidence given upon this score

On the occasion of t an application to Parliament
for compensation for this loss, by the evidence given delivered
by Messrs Chalmers and Cowie themselves supported by proper
Vouchers a loss was stated, and on grounds which
upon the face of them appeared appear reasonable, of a loss actually
incurred to no less an amount than
£ £60,000. Notwithstanding this The sum given as above, by
Parliament was known (it has been seen) no more than £25,000. as above The principle
being admitted, viz. that Administration by its acts though
in that case without any the smallest slightest expectation on that score
having, after the encouragement so given, with the including the expectation of the necessarily
implied profit, been having by its own act been the
cause of loss converted taken away this profit into loss and even
converted it into loss, the suffering party parties had for their
indemnification a reasonable claim upon the justice
of Parliament — When the this principle being admitted, whence then happened it that the whole
then, (it may be asked) that the compensation given was not equal to what the whole of what, as above was looked
upon as proved to be the whole amount of the loss? — Through
the medium of a third person, I received from obtained
t'other day from one of the pursuers (Mr Cowie) an account
explanation, by which an answer was afforded to this question. to that question
When the herrings came to London, had they been sold in London
£25,000 the Committee was satisfied would have
been the whole of the loss. But, thinking to avoid that loss or
reduce the amount of that loss it the gentlemen in question
though as appears by the Evidence not without very ample advice [+] [+] (as indeed Mr
Cowie's evidence as
presented by the Order House
of Commons shews)

yet without the privity of Administration here, sent off the
whole of the cargoes to the West Indies or and other parts of
the world: This I understand was, in conversation with my friend very frankly stated by
Mr Cowie: nor in speaking of what had the sum which in that
consideration had been struck off from his demand did he appear to express any such feeling as
that of a sense of injustice.



Identifier: | JB/122/424/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

0000-05-08Unable to interpret the "0000-05-08" input value as valid date or time component with "There is no year 0 in Gregorian and Julian calendars." being reported.

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

424

Info in main headings field

Panopt. Compensation Claim

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

C2

Penner

Watermarks

<…> Co

Marginals

Paper Producer

A. Levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in