JB/149/222/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/149/222/004: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/149/222/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/149/222/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>decided was 37,880 – of petitions 1,653 –<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
In the last ten years the numbers were<lb/>
 
motions 57,163 – petitions 2,718 – and<lb/>
 
the increase upon Bankrupt petitions<lb/>
 
was <del>from</del> 13 or nearly 1400 beyond the<lb/>
amount in Lord Hardwicke's time though<lb/>
the Orders of Lord Roslyn had a tendency<lb/>
rather to diminish the number of those<lb/>
petitions.  Yet supposing the <del><gap/></del> paper<lb/>
needed of these motions of cause and<lb/>
that only the same number <del>at</del> remained<lb/>
as in Lord Hardwicke's time <del>still</del> he maintained<lb/>
that even upon the same number<lb/>
the labour <add>and time</add> <del>bestowed and time required</del><lb/>
necessary to be bestowed had increased<lb/>
beyond all comparison.</p>
<p>With regard to Lunacies – he believed that<lb/>
description of business did not occupy<lb/>
much of the Chancellor's time – <del><gap/></del> but<lb/>
<del>from</del> the result of every view that he<lb/>
could take of the subject was that<lb/>
there was a great increase of business in<lb/>
the Court of Chancery and a great arrear of<lb/>
causes – that there was  a great arrear<lb/>
of appeals and writs of error in the house<lb/>
of Lords and that the arrear of<lb/>
appeals from Scotland had greatly increased<lb/>
in this session – and that <del>upon</del> <add>upon</add><lb/>
the whole they had sufficient materials</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:51, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

decided was 37,880 – of petitions 1,653 –
In the last ten years the numbers were
motions 57,163 – petitions 2,718 – and
the increase upon Bankrupt petitions
was from 13 or nearly 1400 beyond the
amount in Lord Hardwicke's time though
the Orders of Lord Roslyn had a tendency
rather to diminish the number of those
petitions. Yet supposing the paper
needed of these motions of cause and
that only the same number at remained
as in Lord Hardwicke's time still he maintained
that even upon the same number
the labour and time bestowed and time required
necessary to be bestowed had increased
beyond all comparison.

With regard to Lunacies – he believed that
description of business did not occupy
much of the Chancellor's time – but
from the result of every view that he
could take of the subject was that
there was a great increase of business in
the Court of Chancery and a great arrear of
causes – that there was a great arrear
of appeals and writs of error in the house
of Lords and that the arrear of
appeals from Scotland had greatly increased
in this session – and that upon upon
the whole they had sufficient materials


Identifier: | JB/149/222/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 149.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

149

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

222

Info in main headings field

Image

004

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5 / / /

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[fleur de lys motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

50076

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in